Skip to content

Comparing the Rangers to the 1994 team that broke ‘the curse’

Jun 3, 2014, 12:05 PM EDT

Messier AP

For the first time in 20 years, the New York Rangers are in the Stanley Cup Final series. It’s a big deal even if Sports Illustrated probably won’t run a cover story about how “The NHL is hot and the NBA is not” this time around.

The cast of characters is wildly different, yet there are enough interesting parallels between the Stanley Cup-winning 1994 team and this 2014 squad that it could be fun to study the similarities and differences. Feel free to share your own parallels (or disagree about these) in the comments.

The Team

The 2013-14 Rangers finished second in the Metropolitan Division, enjoying strong puck possession and getting this far by playing great team defense. The 1994 version seemed more like a total package; the Rangers scored the fourth-most goals and allowed the third least goals in going 52-24-8 (112 points) to win the Atlantic Division and the Presidents’ Trophy before that Cup win.

Fittingly enough, the New Jersey Devils were the only team close in the standings, finishing with 106 points.

The Captain

Mark Messier made that famous guarantee on his way to the sixth Stanley Cup victory of his storied career and the first Rangers championship in 54 years. On the other hand, these Rangers don’t even possess a captain.

That’s not to say they lack leadership, however. Henrik Lundqvist is a steadying presence in net. Martin St. Louis came to New York in exchange for their former captain Ryan Callahan. Rick Nash is a former captain and Brad Richards knows big-game pressure.

No one’s made a flat-out guarantee, which is wise considering the modern news cycle. That’s not to say this group is meek by any means; St. Louis did state that this is “our time” after beating the Montreal Canadiens in Game 4.

The Goalie

source: Getty Images

Credit: Getty Images

There’s something oddly fitting about Lundqvist winning his 42nd career playoff game, just now passing Mike Richter for the franchise record. Lundqvist, 32, also has a few more career regular season victories (309) than Richter finished with (301). Lundqvist also has that 2006 gold medal, a Vezina Trophy and a contract that indicates that Lundqvist will leave Richter far behind statistically speaking.

Even so, for many Rangers fans, “King Henrik” won’t pass Richter until he wins it all.

The Defenseman

Ryan McDonagh is a rising star defenseman. He’s even putting up some numbers that haven’t been seen since Brian Leetch was at his best. McDonagh is one of the best blueliners the team has employed since Leetch and he’s only 24. But he’s not Leetch yet.

Leetch wasn’t that much older at the time, yet he was absolutely in his peak years back then. He won his first of two Norris Trophies in 1991-92 and went on to win the Conn Smythe in 1994.

Then again, it’s not just about Leetch and McDonagh. The Rangers employed regularly underrated defenseman Sergei Zubov, who led the Rangers in regular-season scoring with 89 points (five more than Messier and 10 more than Leetch).

The Deadline deals

As this article lays out, then-Rangers GM Neil Smith mortgaged future assets to win that year and also chisel the team into “Iron” Mike Keenan’s image. That included a deal that sent Tony Amonte to Chicago for Stephane Matteau, which still seems to haunt Smith.

Current Rangers GM Glen Sather set out to make this roster friendlier to his coach Alain Vigneault, even though the general vibe is reversed (grit to finesse). Martin St. Louis has been a fantastic fit in the playoffs in particular, yet the Tampa Bay Lightning received two first-round picks and Ryan Callahan on at least a “rental” basis for their troubles.

Even though the 1994 Rangers made a larger volume of moves, the big-picture message was the same: win now.


The 1994 Rangers were dominant where this version is talented yet scrappy. There are some other similarities and differences (this year’s team boasts some nice young talent while the ’94 group featured the likes of Alex Kovalev), yet these big picture considerations make for an interesting comparison.

  1. djshnooks - Jun 3, 2014 at 2:43 PM

    That’s hilarious. Comparing a team with hall of famers on it, to a team with…some overpaid and underachieving players, who finally got lucky and made a run for once?

    Nobody on that team could hold Messier’s or Leetch’s jockstrap…not even close.

    • moarjam - Jun 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM

      You’re an angry little guy aren’t you?

      Who’s overpaid? Richards maybe? Every team has em. There’s a Richards on the other side making $6m playing 4th line minutes.

      They are underachievers buuuut yet they overachieved everyone’s expectations and its just luck?

      Messier and Leetch were generational players. Few alive could hold their jockstraps.

      • habs9 - Jun 7, 2014 at 1:14 PM

        regardless of all that, he’s right, these 2 teams simply dont compare…..the ’14 team doesnt come close, the 94 team looked dominant from start to finish and rightfully so

        i love how Sergei Zubov leading the team in points is like a side note…..because that’s happened so many times in…well ever….just a lil sidenote though

  2. afce22 - Jun 3, 2014 at 5:24 PM

    Well Nash is overpaid too.

    Biggest similarity between the teams is they each rolled 4 lines and the philosophy was constant puck pressure. Rangers haven’t successfully deployed the forecheck between then and now but this group really gets after it.

    Too many differences to list, biggest ones are scoring and experience among players who’ve won the cup. 94 was the Rangers first cup in decades but not for many of the players. They had all those ex-Oilers: Messier, Graves, McTavish, Tikkanen, Lowe, Beukeboom.

    • kwells44 - Jun 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM

      Beukeboom. One of the great hockey names!

Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. P. Kessel (1555)
  2. P. Kane (1403)
  3. S. Matthias (1265)
  4. M. Zuccarello (1171)
  5. D. Carcillo (1142)