Skip to content

Penguins regain home ice advantage with late surge

Apr 21, 2014, 9:47 PM EDT

Pittsburgh Penguins v Columbus Blue Jackets - Game Three Getty Images

Since suffering a 4-3 overtime loss to Columbus in Game 2, the Pittsburgh Penguins have been accused of narcissism and one of their own suggested that sometimes they don’t play with enough desperation, but one thing no one has ever suggested is that these Penguins can’t score and tonight, that was enough to lead them to a 4-3 victory.

Pittsburgh was behind 2-0 just 3:18 minutes into the contest, but they bombarded Blue Jackets goaltender Sergei Bobrovsky throughout the contest. The Penguins outshot the Blue Jackets in every period and 15-5 in the third frame.

The result is that Bobrovsky more than doubled Marc-Andre Fleury in saves (37 to 17) despite being on the losing end.

For a while it looked like Bobrovsky might be able to hold off the Penguins. It wasn’t until Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik scored in the dying seconds of the second period that the first cracks in his armor were shown.

Columbus’ Cam Atkinson quickly reestablished the two-goal edge early in the third period, but Pittsburgh broke out with three goals in the span of 2:13 minutes courtesy of Brandon Sutter, Lee Stempniak, and Jussi Jokinen.

Both teams have held 3-1 leads in this series and neither squad has been able to hold onto that edge.

Pittsburgh now has regain home ice advantage in this series and has a 2-1 lead.

  1. killerpgh - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:49 PM

    I guess the plan for game 4 should be pull the goalie to start the game and give up 2 goals and then come back for the win. All 3 games in this series had the team down by 2 come back and win.

    • elmerbrownelmerbrown - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:57 PM

      Whewww that was a close one FLYERS fans are breathing easier tonight

      • killerpgh - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:05 PM

        That’s nice to know. Personally I don’t care if every Flyer fan never breaths again. But hey keep on Trolling.

      • elmerbrownelmerbrown - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:12 PM

        Sometimes when people are frightened they way things they dont really mean

    • imleftcoast - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:11 PM

      Getting scored on with a second left in the period seems to be a killer in this post-season.

    • hockey412 - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:12 AM

      OR, they can actually come out ready to play and not wait for a reason to move their freaking feet. They played the third period the way they should play every period…getting them to do so seems to be more than Dan can handle – this was actually one of my least favorite games I’ve seen the Pens play. They said they needed more ‘desperation’, and came out completely flat and slow for two periods? Wow.

      If by desperation they meant trying to force passes that clearly aren’t there instead of shooting, then ok. Crosby is now tied for first in post-season giveaways, Letang’s tied for second. The problem with that is that the team is structured for those guys to be the ones NOT giving it away. The defense played miserable, Scuderi showed that he is an excellent third pairing D-man, and Martin’s not much better.

      Ok whew…sorry – end rant. I’d trade Despres and Sutter both for Dubinsky at this point…he’s exactly what the team needs – someone that goes out and plays with grit – someone to set an example that isn’t being set.

      • jdlinder11 - Apr 22, 2014 at 9:25 AM

        They outplayed the blues for the final 50 minutes of that hockey game. they just didnt score until the very end of the 2nd

      • hockey412 - Apr 22, 2014 at 10:20 AM

        I saw some other people had that impression, and I just don’t agree at all. They are capable of playing much harder (like they did in the third) than they did in the first two periods. They just have to WANT to. They outshot the Blue Jackets, but hell half of those shots were from WELL outside, with no chance of actually scoring, with NO ONE in front of the net even if there was a rebound opportunity. I didn’t see them put any effort into this game until the third. Zero for six on the power play last night…and their power plays (outside of 2 of them) were horrendous. 57% of the face-offs went to CBJ…the Pens were outworked and outhit, EXCEPT the third period. In the third, they FOUGHT to get in front of the net, FOUGHT for high quality shots, everyone except Crosby stopped attempting foolish passes, and they were actually skating…not moseying…skating.

        I don’t think they can rely on Orpik scoring to spark the team all that often.

      • laxman1944 - Apr 22, 2014 at 9:44 AM

        Pretty spot on 412

        Been watching them play and Columbus has been flying all over the place

        But 3 goals on 3 shots is insane……..man if they showed up for 60 min.

        Dubinsky is a tough sob to play against and Yep you could definently use a player that has some sandpaper to his game.

        Not to make a stink but Sid looks almost foggy at times……..very unlike him.

  2. penguins87and71 - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:52 PM

    Wow. What a game.

    • buckeye044 - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:54 PM

      You aren’t allowed to be here. 2 hours ago you gave up on your team.

      • imleftcoast - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:22 PM

        That’s a classic:

        penguins87and71 – Apr 21, 2014 at 7:42 PM
        Whatever, I’m so done with this stupid team. You have arguably the best top two lines in the NHL, but what good does it do when you don’t work hard. Same old crap with this team.

      • ethanmacleod1685 - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:30 PM

        Apply ice to burned area…

      • pitpenguinsrulez - Apr 21, 2014 at 11:43 PM

        Lol

    • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:48 PM

      this is why you see me on here downplaying our “problems” and not throwing in the towel…

      its hockey. its the playoffs. its going to be up and down and you just might lose. level yourself off man.

      • hockey412 - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:15 AM

        They just can’t afford to play the first two periods at the speed of their choosing…there has to be a way to get these guys to move their feet from the first drop and play 60 minutes, but they just aren’t doing it.

      • c9castine - Apr 22, 2014 at 12:41 PM

        i dont think it took them that long. like i said, we outplayed them from the 15 minute mark in the first period all the way through. you dont outshoot a team 2-1 by playing one good period.

        that start was tough man. i dont think we were caught standing still or anything…columbus just came out on fire and their crowd really had them going. it happens.

        i think of it the other way around myself. the penguins played a 60 minute game, the blue jackets didnt. they thought they won after it was 2-0.

    • WillIEverSeeACupInMyLife? - Apr 22, 2014 at 6:45 AM

      @ imleftcoas

      CLASSIC POST!!!!!!!

  3. buckeye044 - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:52 PM

    Missed opportunity. Very disappointing. Young team needs to learn how to close.

    • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:57 PM

      the blue jackets came out with their heads on fire. their crowd was into it i will give them credit. penguins didnt really do anything wrong but bam, 2-0.

      towards the end of the first period and for the rest of the game the pens took over. our secondary scorers came up big time for us. brooks orpik besides the goal played an outstanding game as did paul martin. fleury was excellent again.

      2-1 penguins, onto the next one.

      • dirt2013 - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:19 PM

        Seeing all Pens goals have not been scored by the “primary” and only by the secondary it’s getting harder to draw a line anymore.

      • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:23 PM

        thats fine. better that way. sid and geno can only be held scoreless for so long. and defending against them is allowing the supporting cast more room to breathe.

  4. mangoman1966 - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:53 PM

    Pens outplayed Columbus after first perils

  5. lowenni - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:55 PM

    The Penguins can play 50 minutes of awful hockey and 10 minutes of getting some solid shots on goal and come away with a win. Annoys the hell out of me.

    • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:01 PM

      lol, they can and do kinda often but thats not what happened here.

      outplayed them for most of the game after the 5 minute mark of the first period.

      columbus got outshot 41-20. so, they didnt just “get some solid shots on goal for 10 minutes”

  6. pitpenguinsrulez - Apr 21, 2014 at 9:56 PM

    The start of the game had me quite angry but by the end of the game that all changed. I very happy that we won the game but I’m still not too happy with our start. How people can blame Fleury for the first two goals is baffling. Fleury has played fine in this series personally. I told my dad that if the Pens can find a way to change momentum by any means it can change all. Hence Orpiks goal late in the second changed it all. As for Columbus they tried doing what we did to Boston last year which was play a physical game and out him them. It burned us and now it burned them.

    • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:07 PM

      fleury got a little yippy with those first two but otherwise played an awesome game. the blue jackets came out with a purpose and had the whole team not rattled, but a little of guard.

      they gathered themselves and stopped the bleeding rather quick that could have been worse.

      • therealjr - Apr 22, 2014 at 1:27 AM

        You aren’t going to get far allowing a couple weakies and then being ‘awesome’. Another year, another sub-.900 save percentage. Guy has had one above average post-season in his life – ironically the year they lost to Detroit. Since then, including the Cup season he’s .893 over 58 games. Not a bad series here or there – FIFTY EIGHT GAMES.

        They may beat CBJ just on massive talent advantage, but the rest of the story is already written.

      • miketoasty - Apr 22, 2014 at 10:22 AM

        therealjr – You either A) Haven’t watched the games Fleury has been a part of or B) Don’t understand how hockey works.

        You can get a couple grade A chances that completely skew goalies numbers. Fleury let in one softy off of a rebound and other than that played solid all night, a shot that was going wide that bounced off a Columbus player is what prevented Fleury from having a 90%+ save percentage, how the hell do you put that on him? Fleury is playing fine for the first time in two seasons.

        And actually, an .893 is actually pretty good for a goalie who let in a ton of soft goals and was almost immediately pulled in more than one game. I would have thought it would have been maybe the low .80′s.

        Finally, let’s not forget the team he has playing in front of him. PIT’s offense consists of two pretty much straight scoring lines, you aren’t going to see a ton of defense from either of their lines, Crosby and Malkin play soft in the defensive zone, and same goes for their wingers. The Pens third line is their only real “Defensive” line and I would still use that word loosely in this situation. The Pen’s fourth line may as well be random AHL players, since they are basically pylons out there. As for the defense, you have maybe two good defenseman in Orpik and Martin. Maata is playing well but not like he was earlier this season. Scuderi has been a shell of his former self, I wouldn’t be surprised if he was scratched next game. Letang is okay in his own zone but has been a turnover machine this series. Finally Niskanen, as I have said before, is like Letang but with less skill. Compare this to a team like Boston of Philly who actually focus on having a good defensive core in place instead of always worrying about offense or the quick pass out of the zone.

      • therealjr - Apr 22, 2014 at 1:41 PM

        Toasty, you are either A) Blind or B) Don’t understand math. This has nothing to do with one game.

        58 games
        1,594 shots faced
        170 goals allowed

        An ‘average’ playoff goalie with a .920 SP gives up 128 goals.

        Keep thinking he’s solid.

    • lowenni - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:12 PM

      Haha @pitzpenguinsrulez, the Jackets may be trying to do what Boston did to YOU last year, but if you think the Pens did anything even remotely right last year against the Bruins you’re clearly a delusional and biased fan. Columbus was just playing their game and it worked a bit except for a few flukey goals by the Bruins (Martin, Maatta).

      • lowenni - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:13 PM

        *flukey goals by the Pens

      • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:28 PM

        what do you cal the blue jackets 3rd goal?

        they werent flukey. martin didnt score a goal, he put a shot off to the side of the net and sutter tipped it in. maatta didnt score a goal. he put a shot towards the net, jokinen tipped it in the slot, and get a good bounce in front of the net.

        flukey is when it bounces off the glass, off your back, and in. those were hockey plays.

      • pitpenguinsrulez - Apr 21, 2014 at 11:04 PM

        Your an idiot. Where did I say the Penguins did anything right last year against the Bruins? I said the Pens tried to be a physical team last year by out hitting the Bruins and it didn’t work. You want to talk about flukes goals? Look at Columbus third goal. Maybe you should invest in a pair of reading glasses before you accuse me of saying something that wasn’t said!

  7. atwatercrushesokoye - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:03 PM

    Good comeback for the Penguins, that’s something to build momentum on for sure. For Columbus it’ll be interesting to see how they bounce back from this. Both Crosby and Malkin had assists tonight but at some point the Penguins are going to need heir best players to be their best players and have them dominate some games, if they’re going to make a run.

    Looking forward to game 4!

    • killerpgh - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:09 PM

      The Penguins are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. The top guys do the scoring and everyone says they lack depths and won’t make it far. The depths does the scoring and now they won’t go far without the big guns firing.

      • atwatercrushesokoye - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:18 PM

        You’re taking the statement as too Pittsburgh-centric, the same statement is true for every playoff team, if you want to make a run and win the cup you need your best players to be your best players, along with depth scoring.

      • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:50 PM

        they are both more than PPG players in the post season. at some point they are going to score…

  8. SergeantKabukiMan - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:04 PM

    3 goals 3 shots. If it was NBA Jam they would’ve been on fire.

    • atwatercrushesokoye - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:19 PM

      I miss that game, it was great when your team would go on fire but when your opponent would go on fire it was a nightmare!

      • Steeley McBeam - Apr 22, 2014 at 9:22 AM

        The edition for the iphone is fantastic!

  9. stakex - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:12 PM

    I don’t think it really matters who wins this series. If neither of these teams can hold a friggen two goal lead they aren’t going anywhere.

    • elmerbrownelmerbrown - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:18 PM

      Your so right the FLYERS come back from two down like its nothing !

      • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:51 PM

        well, what happened in game 1 then? something?

    • chanceoffleury - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:38 PM

      Because the Rangers held onto their 2 goal lead yesterday so convincingly, right?

  10. Eutaw's Finest - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:32 PM

    Completely unbiased note on the second period (I have no dog in this fight), but did the refs honestly call an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Columbus for icing Fleury? Even the announcers seemed blown away by this. And a few minutes earlier they called an interference penalty with absolutely no interference apparent. Again the announcer were confused where the call came from.

    Not saying it was pro-Pitt or conspiracy, and I know they didn’t score on either PP, but those calls were extremely ticky tacky and I didn’t see anything remotely close going in favor of Columbus.

    • buckeye044 - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:38 PM

      It’s not just the calls made but the calls not made that are frustrating. Jackets were good on the kill but after being on the PK for 8 of the first 25 minutes, it might have caught up with them.

    • JoeAvg - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:52 PM

      I think the goalie interference call is what you’re referring to. It wasn’t a penalty but depending on the angle of view it could have looked like one. I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt on that one.

      The snowjob (!?!) call (if that’s really what it was for) was completely bogus but they made up for it pretty quick with the call on Letang to make it a 4 on 4. He barely touched him and they called a hook. So there’s your even up.

    • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:52 PM

      foligno would have been smart to not do that, not stand over fleury like that and taunt him…he drew attention to himself.

      yeah, it was a weak call though. lots of those for both sides

    • hockey412 - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:20 AM

      It was one of the worst calls I’ve seen – you are correct. I think it was given back shortly after with a make up call on Neal though, correct? They knew they blew the call.

    • 2qswing - Apr 22, 2014 at 10:50 AM

      yes they did

  11. drewzducks - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:55 PM

    Gotta give Pitt credit for circling wagons around MAF when he appeared on verge of imploding. Their D, combined with lack of killer instinct/sense of urgency by the CBJ offense after the two quickies let the Pens regain their footing and slowly, but surely tilt the ice in their favor. The same youth, inexperience and nothing to lose attitude that served them so well on the road was their undoing tonight.

  12. johnnyd76 - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:55 PM

    OR – you could make the observation that the ref ‘s calls were pro-CBJ (The PENS power-play has been a good friend to CBJ with 2 shorties!).

    The PENS third period shows what this team is capable of if they keep their heads in the game. Desperation normally brings out the best in each team. Down 2, the PENS cycled the puck well, quickly moved into the offensive zone and took advantage of open shooting lanes (a few lucky bounces helped as well). But more important – they did away with the fancy passing and put the puck to the net where anything can (and did) happen.

  13. chanceoffleury - Apr 21, 2014 at 10:56 PM

    Like I said in a previous post, some people may be up in arms about Malkin and Crosby but I’m a-okay with it right now. Last year the top lines did all the scoring and by the third round they ran out of gas. They were all on the down-swing of their scoring high so they fizzled out. It’s been a huge problem of theirs since Staal left. If the Pens can get out of this round purely on their secondary scoring then I say more power to ‘em! It’s not like the goals count more when the top liners score them. Plus, the chance of Crosby and Malkin both being shut out for multiple rounds is slim to none. Malkin, in particular, looked good tonight. He and Neal were both creating a lot of good chances and getting pucks to the net. One of them is bound to explode eventually, and if they get past this round the teams only get harder from here on out.

    The Pens have plateaued a lot since the Olympic Break; I’m crossing my fingers that the third period was the first sign of them starting to roll. When they’re on a high there aren’t many teams who can take them down without being on a high of their own, so I’m crossing my fingers that the finish of this game was just a sign that maybe they’ll start peaking at the right time this year, instead of the month before the playoffs like they’ve done the past 2 years.

    • jaybaileys - Apr 21, 2014 at 11:07 PM

      or this is the new era of Crosby, he gets the crap beat out of him and can’t fight thru it with only 1 legit winger. I am sure he will do something soon but he has been a turnover and nowhere near the net guy for almost 3 games now. I am not sure what geno is waiting on but he seems to have woken up in the 3rd of game 3. Im worried about Sid seriously his passes on the PP are so wrong, I don’t care if you are the best you can’t beat 3 stcks. They are getting good goaltending and all their goals are from the D. This is not a recipe for going deep. The Bruins and Flyers eat this team for lunch if they get out of this round.

      • c9castine - Apr 21, 2014 at 11:23 PM

        neither one of those teams is leading their series yet lets wait till they win first before we start talking about if the penguins advance to round 2.

      • c9castine - Apr 22, 2014 at 1:46 AM

        all of their goals are from D? not sure why that matters but 1 out of 4 tonight and only 2 out of 11 total are credited to D

        making plays from the point? yes.

        detroit does a ton of that.

  14. cutelittleguy02 - Apr 22, 2014 at 12:08 AM

    Wow but, btw it s strange. Crosby did n t play very well.

  15. letsgopens8771 - Apr 22, 2014 at 5:41 AM

    I don’t think that approach will work against Philly or Boston (even though I picked NYR to beat Philthy which would help us out a lot.) but still a great job responding to adversity and I think it took a while but they learned finally that you have to get bodies in front of the net to score in the playoffs. Way to come back, boys!!!

  16. antmel30 - Apr 22, 2014 at 7:08 AM

    I am not a fan of either team. That being said what’s up with pens d. I don’t think 3 goals a gm is going to get them very far. If I were fan of pens I would be wary of d especially letang and scuderi. I think pens need to simplify things on pp. to much east west and trying to be to pretty. The goals that went in are dirty gôals. I am a flyers fan looking in could be wrong but that’s what I see wrong so far. I didn’t comment on jackets because they have no to little chance of advancing.

    • dirt2013 - Apr 22, 2014 at 9:05 AM

      That is a fair assessment along with some mind numbing turnovers.

    • jaybaileys - Apr 22, 2014 at 9:07 AM

      They have been this way all year, usually can’t hold a lead, i.e. game 2 up 3-1 at home and tanked it. They had so many injuries on the D their top 6 played together about 10 games all season if that. Not an excuse just the truth. Plus their coach doesn’t really do defense he’s all about having the puck in the other team’s zone. That’s why he put 4 forwards on the PP the other night with a 2 goal lead and the give up a shortie. They asked him in the post game about it and he said thats what we did all year and it worked pretty good. Really, well it aint working now, 2 games 2 shortie. He finally had 2 D on the points most of game 3. I think you are wrong about CBJ, they are showing their inexperience, but they are playing with the Pens for the most part, this series is far from over. You are correct though, the Pens weakness is D and has been all year. Niskanen has been their best D man all year, Matta was great but after the Olympics seems to have slowed down some, Scuderi has been awful, and Letang, well I don’t even want to say anything about him.

  17. kastout11 - Apr 22, 2014 at 7:59 AM

    Columbus let their foot off the gas and in the 2nd period Pittsburgh started to dominate. Once you let your foot off the gas, it is tough to pick up your play again. Columbus could not handle the Pittsburgh onslaught, because they could not match their intensity. I do not like Pittsburgh because a lot of the guys do not appear to be playing hard. If they think they can play like that against the Bruins, Flyers or Rangers, they are going to be watching the Eastern Conference and Stanley Cup finals on TV.

    • hockey412 - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:22 AM

      What’s infuriating as a fan is that they DO in fact think they can play like that, against anyone. At their own speed.

    • mangoman1966 - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:57 AM

      I agree 100 per cent. Not playing cup winning hockey. Should be clicking on all cylinders to win the cup. You can’t turn it off and on like a light switch. You have to play like every shift is your last. You think these guys would realize this. Still not impressed by there play yet.

  18. antmel30 - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:12 AM

    Pens could advance out of east if they tighten up and play 60 minutes. They can’t get in these wide open gms all the time. If they play against other teams this wide open and play good for only periods of gm and not whole gm they will be out next rd.

  19. bgrillz - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:28 AM

    Funny that Peeair can’t wait to pounce on Fleury and talk about him lemlting down when he gives up a goal, but Bob gives up 3 on 3 shots, and not a peep about him being rattled and needing to be removed from the game. I hate him almost as much as I hate the Flyers!

    • bgrillz - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:29 AM

      *melting

  20. whammy71 - Apr 22, 2014 at 8:39 AM

    2 down…14 to go!

    Style points don’t matter in the post-season. A win is a win!!! It was ugly and not per the Pens script…but I’ll take it.

    Would be nice if Sid/Geno/Neal/Kunitz could score a few goals and help out Nisk, Orps and Maatta.

    • laxman1944 - Apr 22, 2014 at 10:14 AM

      LOL……awesome whammy……good stuff

      • whammy71 - Apr 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM

        Hey – just trying to stay positive in this ugly world of playoff hockey.

        Can’t sign FAs….the trade deadline is long gone….it is what it is. I’m just sitting back…rooting for my team. Hoping and praying for a Christmas Miracle to send us to the promise land!!!!

  21. ewoods6 - Apr 22, 2014 at 9:28 AM

    Puck management is just awful by the Pens. Worse than awful. Letang looks terrible. For a second there, Fleury looked like he did in last year’s playoffs, but thankfully he reeled it back in. Honestly, expect for the first period last night, Flower is the only bright spot. Pens could easily be down 3-0 with how the guys up front have been playing.

    Funny no one mentions no production from Sid, Gino, Kunitz or Neal and no one ever mentions how bad the D has been or how disgusting puck management and turnovers have been.

    How they find ways to get it done is beyond me but they can’t do this throughout the playoffs. They need to fix the ship and fix it fast.

  22. 2qswing - Apr 22, 2014 at 9:30 AM

    A couple notes on this game.
    There are two reasons the shots were so lop sided. First give the Pens credit for carrying zone time but add in the fact that the jackets spent 20% of the game short handed. They killed all of them off but you cant generate offense in that situation.
    Bob should have gotten first star … he got shelled.

    Jackets missed a golden opportunity. I was there and Pitt fans I have good news and bad news. the good news is this was the best most consistent performance by your team in the series despite the start. The bad news is Fluery looked shaky and we just could not put enough pressure on him. If you advance, he needs to get his sh together.

    James Neal spends every time-out whining to the refs. Maybe it worked as the Jackets had a constant parade to the box. The officiating was poor BOTH WAYS.

    all this physical play in the playoffs, throw in a few cheap shots, Lucic nut shot, your occasional spearing. and yet the ass ( # 40) who called unsportsmanlike conduct on Nick Foligno last night for a Fluery snow shower is still allowed to work in this league.
    Hey gang regardless of who you root for, how would you like it if a physical playoff game was decided on that call? Jackets killed the penalty but my lord, given everything that goes on uncalled in the playoffs … a snow shower? how about a warning jerk-wad. #40 also called a ridiculous one-handed hook on Paul Martin in the third.

    See you at Nationwide Wednesday.

Featured video

Bettman hears the boos in Philly
Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. S. Crosby (1848)
  2. D. Roy (1504)
  3. R. Nash (1453)
  4. L. Stempniak (1422)
  5. M. Ribeiro (1365)
  1. D. Cleary (1314)
  2. B. Morrow (1224)
  3. B. Dubinsky (1214)
  4. V. Sobotka (1167)
  5. P. Subban (1124)