Skip to content

Russians no longer mesmerize with brilliant hockey, but golden ‘feeling’ is there

Feb 14, 2014, 10:38 AM EDT

RussiaPos AP

SOCHI, Russia – A feeling lingers in Russia. In the moments after Russia’s occasionally brilliant and often sloppy 5-2 victory over Slovenia Thursday, reporters peppered coach Zinetula Bilyaletdinov with somewhat indignant questions that seemed just a little bit out of step with the moment. After all, this was only the Russians’ first game, a virtual warm-up against an over-matched team, and they did win pretty comfortably …

Bam: Why did the team decline so much in the second period?

Bam: If you could not stop the Slovenian line, all due respect, how can you stop the Americans?

Bam: What are you going to do about the struggling first line?

The Russians have not won a gold medal in hockey in more than 20 years. Officially, they have never even won a gold medal as Russia – their eight Olympic gold medals came under the banner of the Soviet Union and the Unified Team.

And still, a feeling lingers – a feeling that this sport is conclusively Russian, a feeling that the nation’s greatest traits come out in ballet, literature and the hockey rink, a feeling that no many how many years of heartbreak go by, Russia is supposed to win the hockey gold medal.

VIDEO: Watch U.S.-Russia (Saturday, 7:30 am ET) live online

There was, for all intents and purposes, no ice hockey in Russia before World War II ended. There were a few fledgling efforts to get hockey started, and these generally died before they were born. Instead, there was a popular ice sport called bandy, and it helped define a Russian style of hockey unlike anything that came before.

Bandy is a lot like soccer on ice – the outdoor rink is roughly the same size as a soccer pitch, there are 11 players on each team, the ball used is small and round and so on. Success in bandy depends on speed and precise passing and angles – there is not much player contact – so this was the perspective the Russians brought to ice hockey. The Canadians and Americans would rough you up. The Russians were too refined for that kind of game.

The father of Russian hockey was a fascinating man named Anatoli Tarasov who seems like he was sort of a Bear Bryant type of coach. In 1946, in the wake of more than 20 million Russian deaths during the war, there was an effort to start the first Russian hockey league. Legend goes that the first championship was basically formed based on a couple of old hockey rulebooks.

Tarasov was soon taking the lead in creating a Russian style of hockey. He wanted to make it different from the rough-and-tumble Canadian version of the game – he never did like those physical Canadians.

“A hockey player,” he once said, “must have the wisdom of a chess player, the accuracy of a sniper and the rhythm of a musician.” This was how he saw the game. As art. As expression. And to a startling degree, he was able to bring that vision to the ice. The Soviet team played in its first world championships in 1954 – just eight years after the sport essentially began. And the Soviets won it, going undefeated and crushing Canada 7-2 in the final game.

Tarasov had instilled his hockey vision just that quickly. He was forceful man, exuberant, irrepressible, exceedingly harsh one minute, positively jovial the next. His players loved him and despised him in equal measure (which made him different from the other giant of Russian hockey, Viktor Tikhonov, who was unanimously hated).

His love was for the strategies of the game, the angles, the methods of attack. He wanted his players to know each other so well that they would sense, instinctively, without looking, where everyone stood on the ice. He saw the beautiful geometry of the rink and was thrilled with a pass that seemed headed for nowhere only to have a teammate materialize and take the puck in full stride.

The Russian style of hockey awed the world, much in the same way that the Brazilian style of soccer or the American style of basketball did. The Soviet Union took its sports very seriously during the Cold War. Each gold medal, each world record, each triumph was seen as just that, a triumph of Soviet dominance. It was that way in space. It was that way in the arts. And it was particularly that way in hockey. The Soviets won 22 world championships and eight Olympic gold medals and, even more, won them with style and finesse and a flair that was exclusively Russian.

VIDEO: Introducing Russian hockey sensation Viktor Tikhonov

“When they got it going,” American Mike Eruzione would say, “it wasn’t even hockey. It was like ballet or something. You would be on the ice watching them just like the fans.”

It has been a long time since Russian hockey was like that. The breakup of the Soviet Union badly hurt the team. Between 2002 and 2010, Belarus, Latvia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine each fielded a hockey team that qualified for the Olympics. All four countries were part of the Soviet Union before the break.

And with the addition of NHL players to the Olympics, Russia’s ability to field a brilliantly honed team that can make art – the way Tarasov’s teams did – is basically at zero. Olympic hockey now is more about individual skill and the ability to make quick adjustments than it is about building a finely tuned team that moves as one.

But a feeling lingers in Russia. Also, there’s a tremendous amount of talent on this year’s Russian team. Alex Ovechkin, Evgeni Malkin and Pavel Datsyuk probably go on most fans 10 best players in the world list. And with the advantage of home ice and some goaltending questions among the other favorites, there’s a feeling that this is the year for Russia to capture some old glory.

There really wasn’t a lot to learn from Thursday’s game. The Russians scored two goals in the first five minutes and peppered Slovenia goalie Robert Kristan with shot after shot in the first period. The Russians promptly lost their edge in the second period against a game Slovenian team. They regained their footing in the third.

It was the sort of game, frankly, where you probably saw what you expected to see, and what Russian journalists saw, predictably, was doom. You could almost hear the minds whirring away as they tried to figure out the conversion rate for a 5-2 win over Slovenia against Saturday’s game against the loaded U.S. team.

VIDEO: U.S. ready for its showdown with Russia

There’s so much pressure on this Russian hockey team. The Sochi Olympic cost $50 billion and countless hours of frustration to create … and for what? There are other gold medals, of course. Russia won the pair figure skating, for instance – Russia has an unprecedented record in pairs figure skating.

But, in Russia, realistically, there are no other gold medals.

“What would gold mean here?” Ovechkin was asked in what has already become the most talked about exchange of the Olympics. Ovechkin had clearly prepared his answer.

“It means gold only cost $50 billion,” he said and he smiled. It was a joke. Sort of.

  1. patthehockeyfan - Feb 14, 2014 at 10:48 AM

    What an interesting story! And, thanks for it.

    My question is, who is Bam? The reporter(s) asking Bilyaletdinov the indignant questions? Were they Russian reporters? Or, from all over the globe?

    Either way, the media likes to sensationalize. Win a game? “Why didn’t you play better?”

    When Sidney Crosby didn’t have a point in two games, the doom and gloom reporters were asking, “What’s wrong with Crosby?”

    While it would be nice for Russia to win a medal in ice hockey on their home ice, I’m still rooting for the two North American teams.

  2. cofran2004 - Feb 14, 2014 at 10:51 AM

    Well written article, man. It almost makes me want the russians win.

    Almost. I hope team USA smokes them 8-0.

  3. r8rbhawk - Feb 14, 2014 at 11:09 AM

    This is not the type of writing I am used to on PHT, am I allowed to make any funny comments? Seriously though , great article

    • patthehockeyfan - Feb 14, 2014 at 11:13 AM

      “am I allowed to make any funny comments?”

      You just did. :)

      You (and cofran2004) are right. It was a well-written article. Nice to know the history of Russian hockey.

  4. prd797 - Feb 14, 2014 at 12:33 PM

    Wow, I have to say, this was one of the most insightful articles I’ve read on PHT in a while. The history of Russian sport definitely makes one curious to learn more.

    Certainly has been some time since a Russian had a Gold medal around his neck. It would be a storybook ending for the Russian drought to be stymied on their home turf…

    Or they lose. You have to admit, the aftermath would be (as blomfeld might type in one of his long rants) pretty spectacular to ‘follow.’

  5. Lupy Nazty Philthy - Feb 14, 2014 at 4:19 PM

    Great article and all, but Russia’s years of dominance at the Olympics was really just men against boys. Was that way up until NHL players were allowed to go in the ’90s.

    Russia was sending men in their prime to play a bunch of Canadian juniors and American College kids. The “legendary” goalie Vladislav Tretiak was 32 years old in his 4th and last olympics in ’84. Canada and USA’s oldest goalies were 23.

    Now there’s an even playing ground and Russia is brought back down to Earth. Not a bad thing.

    • nothanksimdriving123 - Feb 14, 2014 at 11:14 PM

      It actually was professionals against amateurs, which is why Canada and I think Sweden boycotted for several years. The Soviet Union pretended their players were in the army and merely volunteered to play hockey part-time. They were full-time players with no other jobs.

      • esracerx46 - Feb 14, 2014 at 11:59 PM

        You mean the “Red Army” wasn’t an actual army?

Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. K. Hayes (1833)
  2. R. Johansen (1752)
  3. S. Crosby (1679)
  4. J. Spezza (1469)
  5. A. Ovechkin (1335)
  1. C. MacArthur (1252)
  2. D. Alfredsson (1230)
  3. J. Giguere (1226)
  4. S. Mason (1217)
  5. R. Malone (1189)