Nov 4, 2013, 3:31 PM EDT
Under the current CBA, NHL players are supposed to receive 50 percent of hockey-related revenues, with the owners getting the other half. Occasionally, however, the two sides can’t agree how to add up the revenue. Such is the case, apparently, when it comes to the New York Islanders and their cable TV deal.
When Charles Wang bought the Islanders in 2000 for $187 million, $30 million of the purchase price was allocated to the team’s lucrative cable television contract, which belongs to MSG. The disagreement between the Islanders and the NHLPA is how the amortization (non-cash expense) should be treated when counting the team’s revenue for purposes of calculating the league’s salary cap. This season players are entitled to 50% of hockey-related revenue, according to the collective bargaining agreement between the players and owners that took effect last season.
Based the CBA, the Islanders claim they should be allowed to reduce their annual revenue by the amount of the annual amortization of the cable contract (a few million dollars a year). The NHLPA believes the Islanders should not be able to lower their revenue–and thus the amount of revenue that the players are entitled to–with a paper expense because the team is getting the full amount of the cable fee (over $20 million this season).
Again, this happens from time to time. For example, with the $25 million payment the Phoenix Coyotes received from the City of Glendale during the 2010-11 season. The union wanted that counted as HRR; the NHL didn’t. That dispute went to arbitration, according to the Globe and Mail.
As for this case, sources tell Forbes the Isles are likely to prevail.
We’re sure you can’t wait to find out for real.
- IIHF, NHL to meet next month to discuss World Cup (Updated) 0
- Caps unveil new Winter Classic jerseys 23
- Drouin out 3-4 weeks with fractured thumb 3
- On carrying three goalies, and which teams might be forced to do it 8
- Bettman: NHL won’t expand ‘just to fulfill somebody’s notion of symmetry’ 10
- Report: Johansen lowers demands, but not low enough 35
- Injuries piling up as preseason schedule begins 11
- Report: Fedorov denies contract offer was made to Johansen 8
- Report: Johansen has gotten no shortage of KHL offers 44
- Update: Drouin out with upper body injury, not expected to miss preseason 1
- Jackets reveal Johansen offers — including an eight year, $46M deal (55)
- Report: Johansen has gotten no shortage of KHL offers (44)
- Just how damaging are heated negotiations between Jackets, RFA Johansen? (38)
- Report: Johansen lowers demands, but not low enough (35)
- Desjardins (a.k.a. not Torts) makes good first impression on Canucks (29)