Jul 3, 2013, 11:20 AM EDT
Last night was a good one for Coyotes fans. The prospective owner of the club, Renaissance Sports and Entertainment, got its $225 million arena-management agreement approved by the City of Glendale, allowing the club — to be called the Arizona Coyotes — to remain in the desert.
“For the people of Arizona and for Coyotes fans, we’re finally in a position to begin focusing on life without all the uncertainty,” NHL commissioner Gary Bettman said.
But with all due respect, much uncertainty remains. In large part because of this:
That there is the contentious out clause that RSE was able to negotiate, allowing it to terminate the agreement (and relocate the team, presumably) after five years should cumulative losses reach $50 million.
Others are more skeptical, wondering if RSE’s end goal has always been to relocate the Coyotes. It should be noted that, in five years, new arenas could be standing in Seattle, Quebec City, and Las Vegas.
Whatever you believe, the following questions are worth asking now and monitoring going forward:
Will Coyotes fans rally around the out clause, knowing if they don’t support the team they could lose it? Or, will the out clause serve as an ongoing roadblock to making a financial and emotional investment?
How will the Coyotes address payroll? They’ll need to spend wisely to keep losses to a minimum; however, if they don’t spend enough they’ll risk icing a bad team and missing the playoffs (which would, of course, hurt revenues).
How high will the salary cap/floor reach over the next five years? Some have suggested it could go up considerably, making it even tougher on the NHL’s have-nots.
Yesterday, Bettman sounded optimistic at the potential for success with the Coyotes no longer being run by the league.
“With ownership that’s committed to making the franchise a success, with an opportunity for businesses and fans to know that there’s no uncertainty, we think that this franchise can do very, very well,” said Bettman.
We shall see.
- On carrying three goalies, and which teams might be forced to do it 2
- Bettman: NHL won’t expand ‘just to fulfill somebody’s notion of symmetry’ 8
- Report: Johansen lowers demands, but not low enough 32
- Injuries piling up as preseason schedule begins 11
- Report: Fedorov denies contract offer was made to Johansen 8
- Report: Johansen has gotten no shortage of KHL offers 44
- Update: Drouin out with upper body injury, not expected to miss preseason 1
- Report: NHL officials to participate in preseason without new CBA 1
- Evander Kane: I know I can score 50 goals 16
- ‘C’-less Thornton comes out swing against Wilson’s ‘tomorrow team’ talk 19
- Heeeeeere’s Johnny! Davidson shreds Johansen’s agent for ‘baffling, nonsensical’ contract demands (65)
- Jackets reveal Johansen offers — including an eight year, $46M deal (55)
- Report: Johansen has gotten no shortage of KHL offers (44)
- No icing on the PK? The USHL will see how that looks (43)
- Just how damaging are heated negotiations between Jackets, RFA Johansen? (38)