Skip to content

Video: Patrick Kane’s controversial 3-2 goal

Jun 8, 2013, 11:18 PM EDT

The last time the Chicago Blackhawks were in a playoff game where a team could be eliminated from the postseason, a controversial call was at least somewhat washed away by Brent Seabrook‘s Game 7 winner. This time around, Chicago benefited from a polarizing non-penalty, but Mike Richards eased the angst against officials by making it 3-3.

The contest is currently still in OT, so it gives us a moment to study that goal once more. Did Bryan Bickell deserve a penalty on this play, which would have called off the goal?

At least it wasn’t the game-winner.

  1. dannymac17 - Jun 8, 2013 at 11:21 PM

    i can never play the video files on PC

    • packerswin96 - Jun 8, 2013 at 11:48 PM

      Get a better PC then.

      • dannymac17 - Jun 11, 2013 at 12:52 AM

        core i7 2 GTX 560’s sli, 16GB of DDR3 1866 1000 watt corsair PSU and 80MB down 50 up verizon FIOS.

        Dont think thats the problem. But good try being a goober.

  2. chicagobtech - Jun 9, 2013 at 12:38 AM

    Lots of penalties didn’t get called tonight. As frustrated as I am with the playoffs this season, I think I would have been furious to have the whistle come out at that point in the game.

  3. hockeyallday - Jun 9, 2013 at 12:56 AM

    Someone take Kane back to the hills so he can drink and degrade women in another location. This guy is a piece of merda.

    • jrhawk - Jun 9, 2013 at 10:18 AM

      Another idiot has his say…

  4. hockeyallday - Jun 9, 2013 at 12:57 AM

    He’s no different than the NFL thugs who get locked up for something less than assaulting a cab driver. What a joke. He obviously settled out of court with that cab driver.

    • jrhawk - Jun 9, 2013 at 10:20 AM

      Maybe someone should thug you up some. You definitely need it.

  5. stakex - Jun 9, 2013 at 2:10 AM

    Williams simply fell down on the play. There was no penalty to be called, thus there is no controversy… nice try though, again.

  6. neelybourque778 - Jun 9, 2013 at 7:33 AM

    No controversy. The guy fell down.

    • davidmessina63 - Jun 9, 2013 at 3:36 PM

      I agree. Did not trip him at all.

  7. spitfisher - Jun 9, 2013 at 8:26 AM

    he fell down, perhaps trying to draw a tripping penalty……

    • jrhawk - Jun 9, 2013 at 10:20 AM

      A dive. Plain and simple.

  8. kitshky - Jun 9, 2013 at 11:43 AM

    I hate the Hawks so much it gives me a headach …but what does this have to do with Kane’s past with the cabby? Grow up kids.

    (and that woulda been a crime if that was called…)

  9. blackhawks2010 - Jun 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM

    Controversial? Really? Where do they come up with this stuff….

Top 10 NHL Player Searches