Skip to content

Video: Patrick Kane’s controversial 3-2 goal

Jun 8, 2013, 11:18 PM EDT

The last time the Chicago Blackhawks were in a playoff game where a team could be eliminated from the postseason, a controversial call was at least somewhat washed away by Brent Seabrook‘s Game 7 winner. This time around, Chicago benefited from a polarizing non-penalty, but Mike Richards eased the angst against officials by making it 3-3.

The contest is currently still in OT, so it gives us a moment to study that goal once more. Did Bryan Bickell deserve a penalty on this play, which would have called off the goal?

At least it wasn’t the game-winner.

  1. dannymac17 - Jun 8, 2013 at 11:21 PM

    i can never play the video files on PC

    • packerswin96 - Jun 8, 2013 at 11:48 PM

      Get a better PC then.

      • dannymac17 - Jun 11, 2013 at 12:52 AM

        core i7 2 GTX 560’s sli, 16GB of DDR3 1866 1000 watt corsair PSU and 80MB down 50 up verizon FIOS.

        Dont think thats the problem. But good try being a goober.

  2. chicagobtech - Jun 9, 2013 at 12:38 AM

    Lots of penalties didn’t get called tonight. As frustrated as I am with the playoffs this season, I think I would have been furious to have the whistle come out at that point in the game.

  3. hockeyallday - Jun 9, 2013 at 12:56 AM

    Someone take Kane back to the hills so he can drink and degrade women in another location. This guy is a piece of merda.

    • jrhawk - Jun 9, 2013 at 10:18 AM

      Another idiot has his say…

  4. hockeyallday - Jun 9, 2013 at 12:57 AM

    He’s no different than the NFL thugs who get locked up for something less than assaulting a cab driver. What a joke. He obviously settled out of court with that cab driver.

    • jrhawk - Jun 9, 2013 at 10:20 AM

      Maybe someone should thug you up some. You definitely need it.

  5. stakex - Jun 9, 2013 at 2:10 AM

    Williams simply fell down on the play. There was no penalty to be called, thus there is no controversy… nice try though, again.

  6. neelybourque778 - Jun 9, 2013 at 7:33 AM

    No controversy. The guy fell down.

    • davidmessina63 - Jun 9, 2013 at 3:36 PM

      I agree. Did not trip him at all.

  7. spitfisher - Jun 9, 2013 at 8:26 AM

    he fell down, perhaps trying to draw a tripping penalty……

    • jrhawk - Jun 9, 2013 at 10:20 AM

      A dive. Plain and simple.

  8. kitshky - Jun 9, 2013 at 11:43 AM

    I hate the Hawks so much it gives me a headach …but what does this have to do with Kane’s past with the cabby? Grow up kids.

    (and that woulda been a crime if that was called…)

  9. blackhawks2010 - Jun 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM

    Controversial? Really? Where do they come up with this stuff….

Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. P. Kane (1755)
  2. P. Kessel (1510)
  3. M. Richards (1278)
  4. P. Datsyuk (1094)
  5. N. Backstrom (1085)