Skip to content

Five Q’s: Canucks-Sharks series preview

May 1, 2013, 11:24 AM EDT

Daniel Sedin Getty Images

Will Cory Schneider sink or swim?

Schneider finished the regular season with great numbers (17-9-4, .927 SV%), and he was especially good in March and April as Roberto Luongo was relegated mostly to the bench. But Schneider only has four career playoff starts — a pittance of big-game experience compared to the man he supplanted. The 27-year-old’s ability to handle stress and maintain an even keel will be paramount if the Canucks are going to have success. This, of course, assumes Schneider actually plays. He’s been nursing a “body” injury that’s kept his status for Game 1 up in the air.

Can Antti Niemi steal the show?

For all the talk about the Canucks’ goaltending — and lord knows there’s been enough of it — let’s not forget about the guy in the Sharks’ crease. Niemi, who backstopped the ‘Hawks to a Stanley Cup in 2010 (beating Vancouver along the way), put together a Vezina-caliber season in San Jose, starting 43 games and posting a .924 save percentage.  “I think the lockout, in the long run, it’s been a good thing for me,” said Niemi recently. “I just got stronger. My legs got stronger.”

Can San Jose keep killing penalties?

The last time these two teams met, in the 2011 Western Conference finals, the Canucks rode their league-best power play to a five-game win. Vancouver scored nine times with the man advantage in that series. In 2013, however, the Canucks had just the 22nd-best PP (15.8%), while the Sharks dramatically improved their penalty killing, finishing the season ranked No. 6 (85.0%). To be fair to the Canucks, they did show some improvement late in the season, scoring on seven of their last 25 PP opportunities (28.0%). New addition Derek Roy has given them another play-maker up front.

What kind of hockey will we see?

Two years ago, the Canucks and Sharks were among the highest-scoring and most entertaining clubs in the NHL. But things, for better or worse, have changed since then. “We are not a run-and-gun team anymore,” Vancouver captain Henrik Sedin told CBC.ca recently. “You’ve got to be good in your own end. When healthy, I think this is as good a team as we have ever had.” Meanwhile, Sharks defenseman Dan Boyle put it this way: “Today’s game, there’s not so much pretty plays passing up and down the ice as much as there used to be. Playing quick is getting it out as quick as you can and playing in their zone.”

What’s at stake?

Canucks head coach Alain Vigneault acknowledged Tuesday that his team’s window to win won’t stay open forever. If Vancouver bows out in the first round for the second straight season, the Vigneault coaching era may well be over. Likewise, there will be calls for Todd McLellan’s job if the Sharks don’t get to the second round. This is San Jose’s ninth straight postseason appearance, and the club has yet to advance past the third round. Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau, Joe Pavelski, and Dan Boyle can all become unrestricted free agents after the 2013-14 season.

For all the first-round playoff previews, click here.

  1. nobandwagoners - May 1, 2013 at 1:33 PM

    Pretty evenly matched teams from the goal-tending out. Even if the Nucks put in Schneider and/or Luongo.

    It may not be as physical as the LA/St. Louis series but it will still be physical – that’s Torres’ (SJ) forte in the playoffs and ditto for Weise and Lapierre for the Nucks. I expect a 6-7 game series with a toss up who emerges.

  2. imleftcoast - May 1, 2013 at 1:43 PM

    Swim, maybe, probably, tight and probably nothing.

  3. valoisvipers - May 1, 2013 at 3:41 PM

    The article fails to mention the Sharks were 3-0 against the Canucks this season.

    • kitshky - May 1, 2013 at 3:47 PM

      …and the article also fails to mention that Vancouver is icing a much different and much healthier team, and that Vancouver has gotten Derek Roy and Ryan Kesler since last time they played each other.

      • valoisvipers - May 2, 2013 at 10:04 AM

        More whine with that cheese before you set the city on fire.

      • kitshky - May 2, 2013 at 1:37 PM

        Ha..

        So my replying to you and using the exact sentence structure mimicking your whining is … me whining? You’re such a joke.

      • valoisvipers - May 3, 2013 at 2:17 AM

        No but it might qualify you as a dumb parrot.
        Speaking of jokes Who’s in nets for the Canucks?
        or Have you ever heard the one about the team that never won a cup?
        or How about this one How many Canuckle heads does it take to burn down a city?

Top 10 NHL Player Searches