<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dallas&#8217; Benn to have disciplinary hearing after cross checking Jones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/01/dallas-benn-to-have-disciplinary-hearing-after-cross-checking-jones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/01/dallas-benn-to-have-disciplinary-hearing-after-cross-checking-jones/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabatimus</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/01/dallas-benn-to-have-disciplinary-hearing-after-cross-checking-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-144387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sabatimus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 23:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1217479#comment-144387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was Jones hurt? I disagree that that should be criteria for a suspension or fine, but Shanahan does use that as a factor.  Me, I think a hearing for this is utterly ridiculous.  Yes it was a blind, cowardly, and total jerk move by Benn.  But it wasn&#039;t a head shot, or a high hit, and I think that no one can argue intent to injure here with a straight face.  I&#039;d have given him 4:00 and moved on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Jones hurt? I disagree that that should be criteria for a suspension or fine, but Shanahan does use that as a factor.  Me, I think a hearing for this is utterly ridiculous.  Yes it was a blind, cowardly, and total jerk move by Benn.  But it wasn&#8217;t a head shot, or a high hit, and I think that no one can argue intent to injure here with a straight face.  I&#8217;d have given him 4:00 and moved on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killerpgh</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/01/dallas-benn-to-have-disciplinary-hearing-after-cross-checking-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-144371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killerpgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1217479#comment-144371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, but just because there is a hearing doesn&#039;t mean a fire or suspension will come from it. max pacioretty had a hearing last week and got no fine/suspension.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but just because there is a hearing doesn&#8217;t mean a fire or suspension will come from it. max pacioretty had a hearing last week and got no fine/suspension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nunan</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/01/dallas-benn-to-have-disciplinary-hearing-after-cross-checking-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-144367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nunan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1217479#comment-144367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shouldn&#039;t be a suspendable offense. This is what worries me - coaches, players, and fans getting in the habit of calling for a league review of every incident. Just because there is an incident after a play or someone gets hurt after getting hit does not mean it is a suspendable offense or that someone needs to be punished. The league reviews started because of the dirty hits to the head. There were too many concussions. Going completely overboard now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t be a suspendable offense. This is what worries me &#8211; coaches, players, and fans getting in the habit of calling for a league review of every incident. Just because there is an incident after a play or someone gets hurt after getting hit does not mean it is a suspendable offense or that someone needs to be punished. The league reviews started because of the dirty hits to the head. There were too many concussions. Going completely overboard now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
