Comments on: Torts ‘not sure’ about Nash, McDonagh http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/torts-not-sure-about-nash-mcdonagh/ ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com Thu, 23 May 2013 14:12:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: whatthehellisansky http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/torts-not-sure-about-nash-mcdonagh/comment-page-1/#comment-142702 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:13:13 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1180674#comment-142702 “The Rangers have lost three straight games — all without Nash — and have accumulated just four points in their last five contests.”

How many of those were shootouts?

]]> By: barkar942 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/torts-not-sure-about-nash-mcdonagh/comment-page-1/#comment-142684 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:17:41 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1180674#comment-142684 “Not sure” is at least more vague than “None of your business”.
Not sure could mean that they both could play Tuesday or one or the other could play or neither could play.
None of your business means none of your business.
Glad that is all cleared up!(b)

]]>