<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bruins sign Pandolfo &#8212; one year, $600,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/12/bruins-sign-pandolfo-one-year-600000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/12/bruins-sign-pandolfo-one-year-600000/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brcorson</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/12/bruins-sign-pandolfo-one-year-600000/comment-page-1/#comment-137818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brcorson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1055651#comment-137818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incomplete?  Who&#039;s missing or under-performing from the 3rd line?  Peverly has been solid, as has Kelly and Bourque is coming into his own...would like to see Pandolfo but not sure any of those 3 has earned a demotion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incomplete?  Who&#8217;s missing or under-performing from the 3rd line?  Peverly has been solid, as has Kelly and Bourque is coming into his own&#8230;would like to see Pandolfo but not sure any of those 3 has earned a demotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremyroenickdanceparty</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/12/bruins-sign-pandolfo-one-year-600000/comment-page-1/#comment-137796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremyroenickdanceparty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1055651#comment-137796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this case I think its because he played in the AHL this season and not in the NHL yet.  He has to clear entry waivers.  If he had been waived down to the AHL prior then he wouldn&#039;t need to clear re-entry as the new CBA eliminated re-entry waivers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this case I think its because he played in the AHL this season and not in the NHL yet.  He has to clear entry waivers.  If he had been waived down to the AHL prior then he wouldn&#8217;t need to clear re-entry as the new CBA eliminated re-entry waivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeywithdrawal</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/12/bruins-sign-pandolfo-one-year-600000/comment-page-1/#comment-137781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeywithdrawal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1055651#comment-137781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does this require waivers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this require waivers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nunan</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/12/bruins-sign-pandolfo-one-year-600000/comment-page-1/#comment-137778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nunan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1055651#comment-137778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Makes sense if they want to try something new on the third line. It&#039;s a cheap option so might as well see how it goes. If things don&#039;t improve though, I wonder if it&#039;ll push them towards some sort of acquisition with their new-found cap space. They would be pretty incredible if they can sure up that third line. Right now, it&#039;s only 2/3 complete.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense if they want to try something new on the third line. It&#8217;s a cheap option so might as well see how it goes. If things don&#8217;t improve though, I wonder if it&#8217;ll push them towards some sort of acquisition with their new-found cap space. They would be pretty incredible if they can sure up that third line. Right now, it&#8217;s only 2/3 complete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
