<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Habs squeak by Senators after controversial disallowed goal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nosefacekillah</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nosefacekillah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NHL must have directed the officials to increase focus on these GI calls. The Boston-Toronto game on Saturday had phantom calls each way.  At least those did not change the outcome of the game.  This really cheapens the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NHL must have directed the officials to increase focus on these GI calls. The Boston-Toronto game on Saturday had phantom calls each way.  At least those did not change the outcome of the game.  This really cheapens the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeydon10</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeydon10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that Tomas Holmstrom is retired, the refs don’t know who to target for these goalie interference calls. The refs are confused.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Tomas Holmstrom is retired, the refs don’t know who to target for these goalie interference calls. The refs are confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeydon10</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeydon10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that Tomas Holmstrom is retired, the refs don&#039;t know who to target for these goalie interference calls. The refs are confused.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Tomas Holmstrom is retired, the refs don&#8217;t know who to target for these goalie interference calls. The refs are confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ballistictrajectory</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ballistictrajectory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the two in the Bruins-Toronto game Saturday night. Both should have counted.

It&#039;s beginning to look like something&#039;s afoot. This many bad interference calls can&#039;t be coincidence. It looks a lot like the obstruction/hooking mess after the last lockout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the two in the Bruins-Toronto game Saturday night. Both should have counted.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s beginning to look like something&#8217;s afoot. This many bad interference calls can&#8217;t be coincidence. It looks a lot like the obstruction/hooking mess after the last lockout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nothanksimdriving123</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nothanksimdriving123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may have been even worse than the awful call that cost the Leafs their only goal Sat. night. Negligible contact OUTSIDE the crease should certainly not be a penalty or negate a goal. Ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may have been even worse than the awful call that cost the Leafs their only goal Sat. night. Negligible contact OUTSIDE the crease should certainly not be a penalty or negate a goal. Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flamethrower883</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flamethrower883]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They don&#039;t need more video reviews, make the goalie interference call clear as day. If you outside of the crease as a goalie, make them fair game. Or at least make the rule understandable so they can get the call right the first time. Because last thing we need is to make the refs have no pressure to get the call right the first time. Giving refs the option to always change their call will make them lazy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t need more video reviews, make the goalie interference call clear as day. If you outside of the crease as a goalie, make them fair game. Or at least make the rule understandable so they can get the call right the first time. Because last thing we need is to make the refs have no pressure to get the call right the first time. Giving refs the option to always change their call will make them lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 19to77</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[19to77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed. I&#039;ve thought about the idea of giving each coach a call for automatic review from Toronto once per game. Originally I thought one per period, but that&#039;s six in a game if both coaches use them all - wasted time to the fans in the stands, and terrible for the pace of the game. But I figure with one each, useable on goals or penalties only, they&#039;d be able to clean up a lot of the human error the refs experience.

One downside is, there&#039;s still the potential to abuse them to buy players rest time in the right circumstances, and I&#039;m not really sure how to remedy that.

I don&#039;t know, what do you guys think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I&#8217;ve thought about the idea of giving each coach a call for automatic review from Toronto once per game. Originally I thought one per period, but that&#8217;s six in a game if both coaches use them all &#8211; wasted time to the fans in the stands, and terrible for the pace of the game. But I figure with one each, useable on goals or penalties only, they&#8217;d be able to clean up a lot of the human error the refs experience.</p>
<p>One downside is, there&#8217;s still the potential to abuse them to buy players rest time in the right circumstances, and I&#8217;m not really sure how to remedy that.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, what do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeywithdrawal</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeywithdrawal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should give the refs whistles that only work every.third time they try to use them. It sucks that there&#039;s no way to argue those calls after the fact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should give the refs whistles that only work every.third time they try to use them. It sucks that there&#8217;s no way to argue those calls after the fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dillpx183</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dillpx183]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and I thought the Flyers goals disallowed in the Flyers-Sabres games a couple weeks ago were horrendous....wow.....need to be able to review these types of plays and goaltender interference shouldn&#039;t be getting called when the goalie isn&#039;t in his crease]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I thought the Flyers goals disallowed in the Flyers-Sabres games a couple weeks ago were horrendous&#8230;.wow&#8230;..need to be able to review these types of plays and goaltender interference shouldn&#8217;t be getting called when the goalie isn&#8217;t in his crease</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nygdriveforfive</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nygdriveforfive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 03:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An apology is surely coming from the league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An apology is surely coming from the league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valoisjoeybfeld69</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[valoisjoeybfeld69]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terrible call. Ref had a plane to catch for Nawlins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible call. Ref had a plane to catch for Nawlins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The refs clearly bet on Montreal...

Seriouslly though, goaltender interference when a goal is scored should of course be a reviewable play. I know the argument is that its a subjective call, but so are a lot of the &quot;kicking motion&quot; reviews. Far too many goals are disallowed due to phantom GI calls, and its a really easy problem to fix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The refs clearly bet on Montreal&#8230;</p>
<p>Seriouslly though, goaltender interference when a goal is scored should of course be a reviewable play. I know the argument is that its a subjective call, but so are a lot of the &#8220;kicking motion&#8221; reviews. Far too many goals are disallowed due to phantom GI calls, and its a really easy problem to fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeyflow33</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeyflow33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 01:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biased home officiating in Montreal, has that ever happened before?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biased home officiating in Montreal, has that ever happened before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewsylvania</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drewsylvania]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 01:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see Montreal-town officiating is alive and well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Montreal-town officiating is alive and well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 19to77</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[19to77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 01:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about ejecting Backes from a tie game against a divisional rival because of a clean shoulder to body hit? The Wings scored the game winner off that power play. =/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about ejecting Backes from a tie game against a divisional rival because of a clean shoulder to body hit? The Wings scored the game winner off that power play. =/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1943mrmojorisin1971</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1943mrmojorisin1971]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 01:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Mu-mu-mustache. There are no words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mu-mu-mustache. There are no words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmenfan1982</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gmenfan1982]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is one of my top 5 worst calls I&#039;ve ever seen. Talk about a phantom penalty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one of my top 5 worst calls I&#8217;ve ever seen. Talk about a phantom penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasndc75</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/03/habs-squeak-by-senators-after-controversial-disallowed-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-134431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jasndc75]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1029770#comment-134431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow, can&#039;t blow a call much worse that that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, can&#8217;t blow a call much worse that that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
