<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burrows&#8217; controversial shootout move legal, says ex-ref Fraser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:27:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elvispocomo</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elvispocomo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 06:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@kitshky: thank you, someone got it. I am curious why the delay when we never really see that, but hardly anything so major as to call shenanigans.

The prior clock incident mentioned was a mistake, and the explanation clearly a horrible attempt at trying to sound confident and avoid criticism. They should have lost that game and as close as they were to missing the playoffs, it might have been enough to change them from SC champs, to 9th in the West.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kitshky: thank you, someone got it. I am curious why the delay when we never really see that, but hardly anything so major as to call shenanigans.</p>
<p>The prior clock incident mentioned was a mistake, and the explanation clearly a horrible attempt at trying to sound confident and avoid criticism. They should have lost that game and as close as they were to missing the playoffs, it might have been enough to change them from SC champs, to 9th in the West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron05342</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ron05342]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@kitshky: Actually, I don&#039;t see how &quot;the timekeepers in LA are hardly above repute&quot; bootstraps up to &quot;the refs would be trying to ice him out.&quot; Maybe you can explain it to me.

I&#039;m thinking that the &quot;obvious crack&quot; about the timekeeping is just about being a sore loser from last season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kitshky: Actually, I don&#8217;t see how &#8220;the timekeepers in LA are hardly above repute&#8221; bootstraps up to &#8220;the refs would be trying to ice him out.&#8221; Maybe you can explain it to me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking that the &#8220;obvious crack&#8221; about the timekeeping is just about being a sore loser from last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comeonnowguys</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[comeonnowguys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t it ice the goalie more than the scorer? I&#039;m not sure I see the benefit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it ice the goalie more than the scorer? I&#8217;m not sure I see the benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitshky</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kitshky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has already been resolved a thousand times over with every spin-o-rama shootout goal...  

The puck doesn&#039;t have to technically be moving forward, the puck is deemed to be continuing forward unless either the forward offensive movement of the shooter has ceased or the defensive player is the one that physically stops forward motion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has already been resolved a thousand times over with every spin-o-rama shootout goal&#8230;  </p>
<p>The puck doesn&#8217;t have to technically be moving forward, the puck is deemed to be continuing forward unless either the forward offensive movement of the shooter has ceased or the defensive player is the one that physically stops forward motion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitshky</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kitshky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ron05342 I guess some posters still overreact to an obvious crack that is there simply to underscore the bigger point of his comment that had nothing to do with the timekeeping at the game....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ron05342 I guess some posters still overreact to an obvious crack that is there simply to underscore the bigger point of his comment that had nothing to do with the timekeeping at the game&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macjacmccoy</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macjacmccoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[actually it wasnt legal.  The puck didnt continuously go toward the goalie.  Everything was fine during the spin and right after the spin but when he went for that last deke he pulled the puck back which should have stopped the attempt right then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually it wasnt legal.  The puck didnt continuously go toward the goalie.  Everything was fine during the spin and right after the spin but when he went for that last deke he pulled the puck back which should have stopped the attempt right then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When watched from the first angle, its clear the puck actually does keeps moving... and I really don&#039;t see anything wrong with the shot to be honest. 

Look, it might not be fair for the goalie... but the shootout is suppose to be a spectacle. So why not allow guys to try funky things like this? It was a terrible attempt, and I have no idea why Quick didn&#039;t simply poke check it away, but it might do the shootout some good to see more creativity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When watched from the first angle, its clear the puck actually does keeps moving&#8230; and I really don&#8217;t see anything wrong with the shot to be honest. </p>
<p>Look, it might not be fair for the goalie&#8230; but the shootout is suppose to be a spectacle. So why not allow guys to try funky things like this? It was a terrible attempt, and I have no idea why Quick didn&#8217;t simply poke check it away, but it might do the shootout some good to see more creativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elvispocomo</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elvispocomo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And yet the clock still had to &#039;reclibrate the coulombs&#039; as Halford mentioned in the game I was referring to that ensured the Kings won.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet the clock still had to &#8216;reclibrate the coulombs&#8217; as Halford mentioned in the game I was referring to that ensured the Kings won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pandorasdadca</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pandorasdadca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He missed anyway! Move on. The puck stopped and he bobbled it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He missed anyway! Move on. The puck stopped and he bobbled it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salmon90</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[salmon90]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you get any lazier? At least put some effort into your Canuck bashing. If it&#039;s referring to our subpar shootout performers then yes you have a point. Please expand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you get any lazier? At least put some effort into your Canuck bashing. If it&#8217;s referring to our subpar shootout performers then yes you have a point. Please expand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddysguys</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buddysguys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[looks like the puck stopped to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like the puck stopped to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sw19womble</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sw19womble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typical Canucks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical Canucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron05342</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ron05342]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess some posters still didn&#039;t get the memo: the timekeepers are employed by the NHL, not the teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess some posters still didn&#8217;t get the memo: the timekeepers are employed by the NHL, not the teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuakorr</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshuakorr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The puck looks like it stopped when Burrows spun around, hard to tell for sure from the angle showed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The puck looks like it stopped when Burrows spun around, hard to tell for sure from the angle showed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Halford</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Halford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I heard they had to recalibrate the coulombs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard they had to recalibrate the coulombs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elvispocomo</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/burrows-controversial-shootout-move-legal-says-ex-ref-fraser/comment-page-1/#comment-132236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elvispocomo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1018998#comment-132236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m more curious as to why there was such a long delay for Burrows to be able to shoot? Especially after LA had already hole once. Not that the refs would be trying to ice him out, like a timeout before a field goal attempt, but the timekeepers in LA are hardly above repute. It&#039;s not like they needed to fix the time on the clock or anything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more curious as to why there was such a long delay for Burrows to be able to shoot? Especially after LA had already hole once. Not that the refs would be trying to ice him out, like a timeout before a field goal attempt, but the timekeepers in LA are hardly above repute. It&#8217;s not like they needed to fix the time on the clock or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
