LA would’ve probably won the game had there been a penalty.

69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper – This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.

Again I don’t have any particular opinion about that call but I just wanted to point out that a player can be called with goaltender interference no matter where the goaltender happened to be when he was hit or obstructed.

Ps. Go to the sharks article. I was supporting them. However im not someone who goes to other teams articles to talk about my team. Im not that pompous.

I was so glad the Oilers found a way to win this game I was absolutely livid while watching this on Gamecenter last night.

Daryl Sutter – cry-baby. Get your team playing better hockey instead of blaming refs who basically handed you the game and you still couldn’t come away with it.

maybe i’m just bitter about that Flyers goal they blew the whistle on in that Buffalo game. but for real, seems there’s way too many bad calls in almost every game i’ve watched this season.