Comments on: Video: Gaborik’s hat trick goal gives Rangers OT win

By: bigbadbruins77

bigbadbruins77 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:45:12 +0000

he’s such a great player, Nash looks scary too…

By: broadstbully33

broadstbully33 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:02:23 +0000

He was on fire last night. He just dominated in every way not just offense but his back check was great as well.

By: kmacle

kmacle — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:45:31 +0000

I’m on the fence about calling it a hat trick if it took more than three periods.
But 100% behind losing the charity point and the shoot-out.

By: aklolzer

aklolzer — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:29:02 +0000

I agree, get rid of the charity point. Sick goal by gaborik to end the game.

By: billsin20xx

billsin20xx — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:28:12 +0000

Yes but especially this season those 3 point wins are going to really screw up the standings. A team that blows everybody ut for 2 pt wins this year will not be the top team.

By: gmenfan1982

gmenfan1982 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:06:21 +0000

Yeah if a team is awarded a point for making it to OT then the winner should also be awarded that point on top of two for the win. Hate the OT point, hate the shootout.

By: misterchainbluelightning

misterchainbluelightning — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:03:46 +0000

It was an attempt to encourage teams to open it up a bit in OT. Teams were playing for ties too often in some peoples minds. I don’t mind the 1 point, but I’d like to see 3 point wins

By: jimw81

jimw81 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:44:40 +0000

charity points should be abolished from hockey.