While it’s clear the NHLPA has made moves towards the NHL, expect the following part of the union’s latest CBA proposal (as per the memo sent to the players) to grab the league’s attention:
“There are no guarantees or fixed targets, other than a requirement that, beginning with the second year of the Agreement, players’ share, expressed in dollars, may not fall below its value for the prior season. This proposal allows us to determine players’ share regardless of the effects of the lockout and its aftermath.”
So basically the union is saying there are no guarantees…unless you count the guarantee that the players’ share will never decrease year to year.
For the NHL, this of course means that hockey-related revenues can’t decrease year to year, otherwise the players will receive more than the agreed upon 50 percent of HRR.
Will the owners take that risk? Because there’s no telling how this lockout will be greeted by fans and sponsors. And the economy is anything but guaranteed to improve. There’s even concern in Canada that the dollar could fall considerably if there’s a slowdown in China.
Business is unpredictable. If it wasn’t, we’d all know if we should buy RIM stock.
Yahoo! Sports’ Nick Cotsonika makes another point:
PA proposal doesn't just hurt owners for a bad year. It hurts them for a GOOD year. If revenues spike one year, it costs them the next.
—
Nick Cotsonika (@cotsonika) November 21, 2012
Do players want a team in Quebec City? Say NHL goes there and revs spike temporarily. Now owners have to keep it up.
—
Nick Cotsonika (@cotsonika) November 21, 2012
If this proposal became CBA, owners might work to smooth out revenues year to year, hurting growth and both sides.
—
Nick Cotsonika (@cotsonika) November 21, 2012
Maybe the league will be willing to roll the dice that revenue will continue to grow each year as it did under the last CBA, but if we’ve learned anything about NHL owners it’s that they love their “cost certainty.”
Possibly related update (4:44 p.m. ET):
Asked how long it would take the sport to recover if and when a new deal is agreed upon, Bettman said, "There is no way to predict."
—
Dan Rosen (@drosennhl) November 21, 2012
-
Rangers’ goaltending a concern? ‘We know what Henrik is,’ says Tortorella
May 19, 2013, 8:01 PM EDT
Getty Images
Needs to be better for Game 3.
-
Getty Images
Lighting it up right now.
-
Getty Images
Boston with three unanswered goals.
-
Getty Images
Rest of the night didn’t go so well.
-
Getty Images
New York trailed 2-0 in first-round series with Washington.
-
Getty Images
Canucks’ captain scores twice. Where was that in the playoffs?
-
Report: No supplemental discipline for Quick’s abuse of officials
May 19, 2013, 4:48 PM EDT
Getty Images
He escapes the league’s ire.
-
Getty Images
Brad Marchand might want a do-over.
-
Getty Images
A pair of young players led the way.
-
Getty Images
He was a healthy scratch in Games 1 and 2.
-
Quick assessed game misconduct for ‘abuse of officials’ after Game 3 loss
May 19, 2013, 1:09 PM EDT
Getty Images
He could face league discipline.
-
AP
He played just 15:37 in Game 2.
-
Getty Images
The playoffs haven’t been kind.
-
Playoffs tonight: Spezza’s Game 3 return, Bruins-Rangers highlight your Sunday
May 19, 2013, 10:30 AM EDT
AP
A pivotal Game 3 awaits in Ottawa.
-
Kings’ Scuderi took the diplomatic route complaining about Game 3 calls
May 19, 2013, 9:54 AM EDT
Getty Images
Veteran d-man kept it mellow.
-
Getty Images
“He screws it up.”
-
Penner blasts refs for having ‘gall to guess’ on goalie interference call
May 19, 2013, 12:44 AM EDT
Getty Images
Trevor Lewis doesn’t think it was a penalty.
-
Getty Images
Logan Couture goes from injured to game-winner.
-
Getty Images
His Halifax Mooseheads topped Seth Jones’ Portland Winterhawks.