<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your casual reminder of just how good Pavel Bure was</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/11/your-casual-reminder-of-just-how-good-pavel-bure-was/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/11/your-casual-reminder-of-just-how-good-pavel-bure-was/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 19inarow</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/11/your-casual-reminder-of-just-how-good-pavel-bure-was/comment-page-1/#comment-111420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[19inarow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=877793#comment-111420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting this.  What a trip.  Used to play it waaaayyyy too much.  As I&#039;m watching it, I&#039;m remembering what moves to make and you make them.  I used to pass more just for fun.  And knocking the guys down after the goal.  Heh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this.  What a trip.  Used to play it waaaayyyy too much.  As I&#8217;m watching it, I&#8217;m remembering what moves to make and you make them.  I used to pass more just for fun.  And knocking the guys down after the goal.  Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danphipps01</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/11/your-casual-reminder-of-just-how-good-pavel-bure-was/comment-page-1/#comment-111339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danphipps01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=877793#comment-111339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is pretty much why I think Shanahan deserved Sundin&#039;s spot in last year&#039;s group of inductees. Sundin could&#039;ve been bumped a year down the line for a guy with half again as many goals and points, multiple Cups and who might have been the best power forward ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty much why I think Shanahan deserved Sundin&#8217;s spot in last year&#8217;s group of inductees. Sundin could&#8217;ve been bumped a year down the line for a guy with half again as many goals and points, multiple Cups and who might have been the best power forward ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeydon10</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/11/your-casual-reminder-of-just-how-good-pavel-bure-was/comment-page-1/#comment-111280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeydon10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=877793#comment-111280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the previous years there has been talk about Bure not deserving to be in the HoF. Mostly people were complaining that his body of work was too short and that should preclude him from getting in.

When the discussion was first opened up about who would get the nod this year -- before the selections were announced -- I looks up a few interesting numbers. For a base comparison I used another famous Hall of Famer that played an injury shortened career; Cam Neely.

Before anyone takes this the wrong way, I love watching old clips of Neely, so don&#039;t argue as if I&#039;m saying he should not be in the HoF. I&#039;m not saying that at all.

Here are the numbers:
Neely: 13 seasons (7 good years of 65+ games) 
Bure: 13 seasons (6 good years of 65+ games) 
Both: never won a championship (as a player) 
Neely: 5 all star selections 
Bure: 6 all star selections 
Neely: better playoff success (points) 
Bure: better international success (medals) 
Neely: three 50 goal seasons (including one 50 in 44 games) 
Bure: three 50 goal seasons plus two 60 goal seasons 
Neely: .544 goals per game 
Bure: .623 goals per game 
Neely: More games played, less points 
Bure: Less games played, more points  
Neely: electrifying power forward and scorer 
Bure: electrifying skater and goal scorer 
Neely: Played in high-scoring 80s and clutch and grab 90s (83-96) 
Bure: Played in clutch and grab 90s-00s (91-03)

Based on this simple comparison, it&#039;s hard to take seriously any arguments that Bure should have been excluded.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the previous years there has been talk about Bure not deserving to be in the HoF. Mostly people were complaining that his body of work was too short and that should preclude him from getting in.</p>
<p>When the discussion was first opened up about who would get the nod this year &#8212; before the selections were announced &#8212; I looks up a few interesting numbers. For a base comparison I used another famous Hall of Famer that played an injury shortened career; Cam Neely.</p>
<p>Before anyone takes this the wrong way, I love watching old clips of Neely, so don&#8217;t argue as if I&#8217;m saying he should not be in the HoF. I&#8217;m not saying that at all.</p>
<p>Here are the numbers:<br />
Neely: 13 seasons (7 good years of 65+ games)<br />
Bure: 13 seasons (6 good years of 65+ games)<br />
Both: never won a championship (as a player)<br />
Neely: 5 all star selections<br />
Bure: 6 all star selections<br />
Neely: better playoff success (points)<br />
Bure: better international success (medals)<br />
Neely: three 50 goal seasons (including one 50 in 44 games)<br />
Bure: three 50 goal seasons plus two 60 goal seasons<br />
Neely: .544 goals per game<br />
Bure: .623 goals per game<br />
Neely: More games played, less points<br />
Bure: Less games played, more points<br />
Neely: electrifying power forward and scorer<br />
Bure: electrifying skater and goal scorer<br />
Neely: Played in high-scoring 80s and clutch and grab 90s (83-96)<br />
Bure: Played in clutch and grab 90s-00s (91-03)</p>
<p>Based on this simple comparison, it&#8217;s hard to take seriously any arguments that Bure should have been excluded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwingsfan999</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/11/your-casual-reminder-of-just-how-good-pavel-bure-was/comment-page-1/#comment-111241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redwingsfan999]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 03:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=877793#comment-111241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He had great talent, was a great goal scorer and was one of my favorite players of all time, even though he was a little lazy on defense he still was one of my the best]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He had great talent, was a great goal scorer and was one of my favorite players of all time, even though he was a little lazy on defense he still was one of my the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrchainbluelightning</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/11/your-casual-reminder-of-just-how-good-pavel-bure-was/comment-page-1/#comment-111240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrchainbluelightning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 02:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=877793#comment-111240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another reminder

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4NcYL6TD3I]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reminder</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='635' height='388' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/L4NcYL6TD3I?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
