Comments on: First step: actually define hockey-related revenue

By: keeganbattistoni

keeganbattistoni — Sat, 01 Sep 2012 02:57:33 +0000

Pie

By: paperkid96

paperkid96 — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:55:49 +0000

Money? What money? I thought we were talking about pie.

By: paledevil

paledevil — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:20:03 +0000

Leave it to EF to point out preseason games and road trips are the best earners for the league Somehow even though i reread 3 or 4 times i got the idea they want players to share overseas travel costs?

As far as # 3 Where i am from suites are separate from normal team operations if they contracted it out explains things but honestly i cannot see how or why the sales people are not signing 10 or 20 year suite contracts in a marketing partnership similar to naming the stadium… Stunned better word….o well someone took my job in phoenix …
the point is the owners should get the suites Why should the players benefit for advantageous corporate partnerships Besides as i ranted some sales peop are better than others

By: windmiller4

windmiller4 — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:15:41 +0000

Wouldn’t it just make sense to split it 50/50? cause then no matter how big the pie the owners and players can’t whine about the other side getting more money.

By: ballistictrajectory

ballistictrajectory — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:36:05 +0000

It all depends on what the meaning of “is” is.

By: test2402

test2402 — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:19:39 +0000

Freaking guy in the shop. Bozo bastard.

By: sjsharks66

sjsharks66 — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:08:51 +0000

I’d rather watch hockey then have pie. If you catch my drift. OHH!

By: cweez2

cweez2 — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:08:31 +0000

I think the pie graphic made sense to any 6th grader landing on the page for the first time.

By: kingfooj

kingfooj — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:52:59 +0000

i love apple pie.