<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on how the CBA talks could &#8220;pit owner vs. owner&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/19/more-on-how-the-cba-talks-could-pit-owner-vs-owner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/19/more-on-how-the-cba-talks-could-pit-owner-vs-owner/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 22:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeyflow33</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/19/more-on-how-the-cba-talks-could-pit-owner-vs-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-98361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeyflow33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=839810#comment-98361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like it but the nhlpa is never going to allow for the league to cut 40-80 positions. The owners need to make it work now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it but the nhlpa is never going to allow for the league to cut 40-80 positions. The owners need to make it work now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeyflow33</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/19/more-on-how-the-cba-talks-could-pit-owner-vs-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-98358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeyflow33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=839810#comment-98358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of corse Jacobs is leading the charge against the nhlpa.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of corse Jacobs is leading the charge against the nhlpa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somekat</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/19/more-on-how-the-cba-talks-could-pit-owner-vs-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-98329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[somekat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=839810#comment-98329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seem very common sense to me. The league, as a whole, is making money. However, most teams aren&#039;t, or are making very little. The NHL&#039;s revenue is tied to 7-8 teams. It&#039;s not a surprise at all that the NHLPA floated an idea that those teams share that money with the teams losing money, the teams losing a lot of money said &quot;well, I could live with that&quot;. 

Unfortunately, the thing that should be done, and would fix the league most, isn&#039;t even being discussed. Contraction. If a team can&#039;t support itself, the team shouldn&#039;t exist. You could kill 2 teams (we&#039;ll say Columbus and Pheonix), and it fixes a lot of the leagues financial problems. Expand that to 4 teams (NYI and Florida/Tampa maybe), and it does even more. 

I understand the constant drum beat of revenue sharing, but that is not a clear cut answer here. This is not the NFL with a multi billion dollar TV pie to slice up. Teams like Detroit, Toronto, NYR, Boston etc should not be penalized because other teams can&#039;t build/sell a team correctly. The &quot;you need the bad teams to make the league work&quot; arguement doesn&#039;t work, because the league would run fine with 2-4 less teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seem very common sense to me. The league, as a whole, is making money. However, most teams aren&#8217;t, or are making very little. The NHL&#8217;s revenue is tied to 7-8 teams. It&#8217;s not a surprise at all that the NHLPA floated an idea that those teams share that money with the teams losing money, the teams losing a lot of money said &#8220;well, I could live with that&#8221;. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the thing that should be done, and would fix the league most, isn&#8217;t even being discussed. Contraction. If a team can&#8217;t support itself, the team shouldn&#8217;t exist. You could kill 2 teams (we&#8217;ll say Columbus and Pheonix), and it fixes a lot of the leagues financial problems. Expand that to 4 teams (NYI and Florida/Tampa maybe), and it does even more. </p>
<p>I understand the constant drum beat of revenue sharing, but that is not a clear cut answer here. This is not the NFL with a multi billion dollar TV pie to slice up. Teams like Detroit, Toronto, NYR, Boston etc should not be penalized because other teams can&#8217;t build/sell a team correctly. The &#8220;you need the bad teams to make the league work&#8221; arguement doesn&#8217;t work, because the league would run fine with 2-4 less teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tealwithit</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/19/more-on-how-the-cba-talks-could-pit-owner-vs-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-98325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tealwithit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 05:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=839810#comment-98325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An agent is the furthest thing from a credible source.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An agent is the furthest thing from a credible source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
