Comments on: Report: Visnovsky’s trade grievance remains in limbo http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/ ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:09:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: charleslouis99 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96339 Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:10:57 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96339 Who would want to go to Pittsburgh huh? Nothing but a team of divas

]]> By: charleslouis99 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96338 Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:09:24 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96338 Chris pronger moved here awhile ago.

]]> By: atwatercrushesokoye http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96188 Tue, 07 Aug 2012 01:19:25 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96188 Bingo! I heard this in an interview a few weeks ago, he lost his no trade clause before he ever had it, sorry I replied to the other post without seeing that you had it covered.

]]> By: atwatercrushesokoye http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96187 Tue, 07 Aug 2012 01:17:36 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96187 I heard an interview about this a couple of weeks ago and here’s the issue: he was traded a few years ago from Edmonton to Anaheim (I believe) before his original no trade clause kicked in, when a player goes to a new team his no trade clause does not go with him, instead it’s up to the new team to agree to it and allow they player to have it, so in this case he likely never had a no trade clause when he thought that he did.

]]> By: almightgirthjoxx http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96167 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:03:12 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96167 sorry but nobody wants to move to st louis unless they are forced to. only thing good that ever came from there is your bbq sauce. stay stumpy SCA

]]> By: killerpgh http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96166 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:50:26 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96166 No problem.

]]> By: charleslouis99 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96143 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:23:19 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96143 wonder if he would fit in St Louis
with pietro
I know he had a bad year last year but the goalie situation wasnt pretty for the most part in anaheim

]]> By: elemeno89 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96136 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:31:31 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96136 thanks i appreciate this.

]]> By: killerpgh http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96131 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:22:30 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96131 He had a NTC when he signed his contract with the Oilers. He waived it to go to the Ducks. Now it gets into all the legal laugague if that NTC is still valid. Some contract like Jeff Cater/Mike Richards last off season lost their NTC/NMC once they were traded. They didn’t wave their rights. Cater lost his right to have his NMC/NTC before he ever had it. He signed his extension and got traded before it kicked in. This is the NHLPA trying to better serve its members and strengthen itself.

]]> By: elemeno89 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96113 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:16:27 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96113 wouldnt you think that this would have come up earlier IF the trade violated the ntc… as a player/employee wouldn’t you want to know your employment agreement in and out, what about the gm’s responsibility of knowing what he is trading and the confinements of the player’s contract? idk, seems fishy to me that it came up a MONTH later, and it seems like hes trying to find an out from playing for the islanders much like nabakov.

but again thats on the assumption that it doesn’t violate the contract…

]]> By: killerpgh http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96109 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:51:54 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96109 IF the trade violates his contract he has every right to do what he is doing. Why should he suck it up and play if a right he was given in his contract is not followed? Most likely nothing will come for this but I would imagine the NHLPA is just using this as a way to try and close the “loophole” in the contract language that allows some players NMC/NTC to go away after they are not with the team they signed the deal with.

]]> By: elemeno89 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/06/report-visnovskys-trade-grievance-remains-in-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-96096 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:24:17 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=828486#comment-96096 suck it up and play.

]]>