<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nash on Tortorella call: &#8220;He seemed really intense&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 950003cups</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-94040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[950003cups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 03:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-94040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[None of you fools have a clue what your talking about. Take off the rangers goggles and take a peek. You went from 2 to 3 big egos (when Gaborik returns) to buck heads with Torts&#039; even bigger ego. 

The reason they couldn&#039;t score was because they were weak on a defensive game plan (not talent) so instead of working to figure it out Tortorella put on a band-aid and had the entire team collapsing in front of Lundqvist blocking shots. Yes, Gaborik was benched for not blocking a shot. Had nothing to do with his shoulder. 

You have very little cap space as it is, and Lundqvist&#039;s contract is about to expire along with several other kids. 

Also, a big piece of the CBA is to outlaw burying contracts in the minors (calling Mr Redden) and that might also count on the cap if it goes through without a buyout window. If Lundqvist gets injured for any long period, then the Rangers will be The NY Islanders II. I hear Olli Jokinen is looking to play in NY.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of you fools have a clue what your talking about. Take off the rangers goggles and take a peek. You went from 2 to 3 big egos (when Gaborik returns) to buck heads with Torts&#8217; even bigger ego. </p>
<p>The reason they couldn&#8217;t score was because they were weak on a defensive game plan (not talent) so instead of working to figure it out Tortorella put on a band-aid and had the entire team collapsing in front of Lundqvist blocking shots. Yes, Gaborik was benched for not blocking a shot. Had nothing to do with his shoulder. </p>
<p>You have very little cap space as it is, and Lundqvist&#8217;s contract is about to expire along with several other kids. </p>
<p>Also, a big piece of the CBA is to outlaw burying contracts in the minors (calling Mr Redden) and that might also count on the cap if it goes through without a buyout window. If Lundqvist gets injured for any long period, then the Rangers will be The NY Islanders II. I hear Olli Jokinen is looking to play in NY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charleslouis99</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[charleslouis99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 21:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[they&#039;re not trolls they&#039;re mindless thralls that have listened to anything told to them by the corrupt empire that is the Pittsburgh penguins lol
Richards and Nash will be deadly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;re not trolls they&#8217;re mindless thralls that have listened to anything told to them by the corrupt empire that is the Pittsburgh penguins lol<br />
Richards and Nash will be deadly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostpuppysyndrome</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostpuppysyndrome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DON&#039;T FEED THE TROLLS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON&#8217;T FEED THE TROLLS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyrangersnation</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyrangersnation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have fun with your first round knockout soup can sid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have fun with your first round knockout soup can sid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyrangersnation</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyrangersnation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m perplexed at how little you know about hockey]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m perplexed at how little you know about hockey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyrangersnation</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyrangersnation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re an idiot. They were one of the lowest scoring playoff teams. How would trading Gaborik help? Tortorella was quoted as saying when you have a guy like Nash you have to let him loose. Gaborik wasn&#039;t benched for not blocking a shot. He was rested for playing with a torn rotator cuff. If you&#039;re going to comment at least know your crap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re an idiot. They were one of the lowest scoring playoff teams. How would trading Gaborik help? Tortorella was quoted as saying when you have a guy like Nash you have to let him loose. Gaborik wasn&#8217;t benched for not blocking a shot. He was rested for playing with a torn rotator cuff. If you&#8217;re going to comment at least know your crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 950003cups</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[950003cups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is he called soup can Sid?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is he called soup can Sid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlcpeacock</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[earlcpeacock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[who cares about this its all about soup can sid]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who cares about this its all about soup can sid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richter35lundqvist30</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richter35lundqvist30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah because they shipped out Callahan, Girardi, McDonough, Staal, Stepan, Boyle, etc... Identity is clearly gone.  Losing two bottom six forwards doesn&#039;t change the team&#039;s identity as long as the remaining pieces continue in the same direction.  Gaborik and Richards really were detracting from the teams identity last season too.  Fool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah because they shipped out Callahan, Girardi, McDonough, Staal, Stepan, Boyle, etc&#8230; Identity is clearly gone.  Losing two bottom six forwards doesn&#8217;t change the team&#8217;s identity as long as the remaining pieces continue in the same direction.  Gaborik and Richards really were detracting from the teams identity last season too.  Fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richter35lundqvist30</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richter35lundqvist30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah because they shipped out Callahan, Girardi, McDonough, Staal, Stepan, Boyle, etc... Identity is clearly gone.  Losing two bottom six forwards doesn&#039;t change the team&#039;s identity as long as the remaining pieces continue in the same direction.  Gaborik and Richards really were detracting from the teams identity last season too.  Fools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah because they shipped out Callahan, Girardi, McDonough, Staal, Stepan, Boyle, etc&#8230; Identity is clearly gone.  Losing two bottom six forwards doesn&#8217;t change the team&#8217;s identity as long as the remaining pieces continue in the same direction.  Gaborik and Richards really were detracting from the teams identity last season too.  Fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cruuuzcontrol</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cruuuzcontrol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, a blue collar mentality is nice, but you need to score goals to win. The Rangers didn&#039;t have enough pure goal-scoring talent to do it last season. Let&#039;s hold off on talking about how this team can&#039;t gel until they actually, you know... Play a game or two. I for one think Nash will fit in fine and have no problem playing sufficiently in his own zone. Everyone seems to end up in Tortsy&#039;s crosshairs during the season for one reason or another... I&#039;m sure Nash will be prepared when his moment comes and it won&#039;t affect his play overall, just like it didn&#039;t affect Gabby&#039;s ability to pot 40.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, a blue collar mentality is nice, but you need to score goals to win. The Rangers didn&#8217;t have enough pure goal-scoring talent to do it last season. Let&#8217;s hold off on talking about how this team can&#8217;t gel until they actually, you know&#8230; Play a game or two. I for one think Nash will fit in fine and have no problem playing sufficiently in his own zone. Everyone seems to end up in Tortsy&#8217;s crosshairs during the season for one reason or another&#8230; I&#8217;m sure Nash will be prepared when his moment comes and it won&#8217;t affect his play overall, just like it didn&#8217;t affect Gabby&#8217;s ability to pot 40.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rarelyshaves</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rarelyshaves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So true, I&#039;m Perplexed by the drastic identity shift this offseason as well]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true, I&#8217;m Perplexed by the drastic identity shift this offseason as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 950003cups</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[950003cups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Give Nash 50 games before Tortsy loses his lunch. Rangers should have kept the team they had and maybe traded Gaborik away. I can&#039;t wait when Torts benches Nash for not blocking shots like a human sandbag. Once Gaborik, Richards, and Nash get together and show Tortorella that their contracts outlive his, it&#039;s all gonna collapse. Sather should have kept the blue collar team he had. They were gelled and strong. They trusted each other, and played for each other. that&#039;s all out the window now that you have 3 new captains on one team with 3 different styles. Richards was the good signing. Gaborik and Nash were not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give Nash 50 games before Tortsy loses his lunch. Rangers should have kept the team they had and maybe traded Gaborik away. I can&#8217;t wait when Torts benches Nash for not blocking shots like a human sandbag. Once Gaborik, Richards, and Nash get together and show Tortorella that their contracts outlive his, it&#8217;s all gonna collapse. Sather should have kept the blue collar team he had. They were gelled and strong. They trusted each other, and played for each other. that&#8217;s all out the window now that you have 3 new captains on one team with 3 different styles. Richards was the good signing. Gaborik and Nash were not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaksyuk</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/27/nash-on-tortorella-call-he-seemed-really-intense/comment-page-1/#comment-93622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zaksyuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827541#comment-93622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would honestly say im glad hes out of my teams division but what difference does it make? LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would honestly say im glad hes out of my teams division but what difference does it make? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
