<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Jets offer Evander Kane six-year deal worth about $29M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/23/report-jets-offer-evander-kane-six-year-deal-worth-about-29m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/23/report-jets-offer-evander-kane-six-year-deal-worth-about-29m/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:02:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostpuppysyndrome</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/23/report-jets-offer-evander-kane-six-year-deal-worth-about-29m/comment-page-1/#comment-92330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostpuppysyndrome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827049#comment-92330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really?  The kid is 21, has improved every year, plays a fast, skilled yet tough game (youtube Kane Cooke fight if you live under a rock), has a great +/- on a team that let in more than a handful of goals.  Give him 2-3 years and we&#039;ll be debating on what a steal he was for less than $5mil/season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  The kid is 21, has improved every year, plays a fast, skilled yet tough game (youtube Kane Cooke fight if you live under a rock), has a great +/- on a team that let in more than a handful of goals.  Give him 2-3 years and we&#8217;ll be debating on what a steal he was for less than $5mil/season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostpuppysyndrome</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/23/report-jets-offer-evander-kane-six-year-deal-worth-about-29m/comment-page-1/#comment-92322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostpuppysyndrome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827049#comment-92322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All I have to say is:  YEEEEEEAAAAAAHHHH BOOOOOYYYYEEEEEEE!!  Took em long enough!  Time for Kane to bring the pain!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I have to say is:  YEEEEEEAAAAAAHHHH BOOOOOYYYYEEEEEEE!!  Took em long enough!  Time for Kane to bring the pain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordfletcher</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/23/report-jets-offer-evander-kane-six-year-deal-worth-about-29m/comment-page-1/#comment-92216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordfletcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 03:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827049#comment-92216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s a good move for both player and team... 

after this will expire he will be approaching his &quot;prime&quot; and could see big dollars then, but if his game falls off, he will still have plenty of money to live out his days very happily! 

-wild fan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a good move for both player and team&#8230; </p>
<p>after this will expire he will be approaching his &#8220;prime&#8221; and could see big dollars then, but if his game falls off, he will still have plenty of money to live out his days very happily! </p>
<p>-wild fan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chasemutley</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/23/report-jets-offer-evander-kane-six-year-deal-worth-about-29m/comment-page-1/#comment-92213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chasemutley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 03:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827049#comment-92213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Must be nice to debate an offer like that; 5 years ago those stats earned you half of that contract.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must be nice to debate an offer like that; 5 years ago those stats earned you half of that contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blomfeld</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/23/report-jets-offer-evander-kane-six-year-deal-worth-about-29m/comment-page-1/#comment-92211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blomfeld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 03:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=827049#comment-92211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GREAT MOVE !

Now instead of spreading his contract over 6 years, why not make it an &quot;even Steven&quot; 100 years for an annual cap hit of only $290,000 per ?  God bless the Winnipeg Jets and all, but this brings me right back to the &quot;elephant in the room&quot; which we know as Luongo.  

Luongo&#039;s lovers and apologists will go on &quot;incessantly&quot; about the fact that he&#039;s &quot;only&quot; a 5.4 million dollar cap hit ... and that any team &quot;lucky enough&quot; to land him, will be getting a &quot;bargain&quot; etc.  What a joke I say !  That&#039;s like some car salesman who tells you that you can have that brand new &quot;runner&quot; for only a $135.00 monthly payment.  The problem however is that he won&#039;t tell you that your payments are stretched over a 60 month period, instead of a reasonable 36 or 48 month term.  Luongo has 54 million dollars remaining on his contract and yet anyone who signs him will be essentially purchasing &quot;2  x years&quot; of b-grade goal-tending ... nothing more and nothing less.  Actually, I&#039;m not sure why Gillis didn&#039;t amortize his contract over a thousand years ?  

The bottom line is that these ludicrous long-term contracts amount to nothing more than financial &quot;smoke and mirrors&quot; ... and anyone who constructs such &quot;deceit&quot; must therefore be scum, as is anyone who willingly signs on to such deceit ! 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2C2W_O9BX4g]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT MOVE !</p>
<p>Now instead of spreading his contract over 6 years, why not make it an &#8220;even Steven&#8221; 100 years for an annual cap hit of only $290,000 per ?  God bless the Winnipeg Jets and all, but this brings me right back to the &#8220;elephant in the room&#8221; which we know as Luongo.  </p>
<p>Luongo&#8217;s lovers and apologists will go on &#8220;incessantly&#8221; about the fact that he&#8217;s &#8220;only&#8221; a 5.4 million dollar cap hit &#8230; and that any team &#8220;lucky enough&#8221; to land him, will be getting a &#8220;bargain&#8221; etc.  What a joke I say !  That&#8217;s like some car salesman who tells you that you can have that brand new &#8220;runner&#8221; for only a $135.00 monthly payment.  The problem however is that he won&#8217;t tell you that your payments are stretched over a 60 month period, instead of a reasonable 36 or 48 month term.  Luongo has 54 million dollars remaining on his contract and yet anyone who signs him will be essentially purchasing &#8220;2  x years&#8221; of b-grade goal-tending &#8230; nothing more and nothing less.  Actually, I&#8217;m not sure why Gillis didn&#8217;t amortize his contract over a thousand years ?  </p>
<p>The bottom line is that these ludicrous long-term contracts amount to nothing more than financial &#8220;smoke and mirrors&#8221; &#8230; and anyone who constructs such &#8220;deceit&#8221; must therefore be scum, as is anyone who willingly signs on to such deceit ! </p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='635' height='388' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/2C2W_O9BX4g?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
