<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canucks hand Jason Garrison a splashy six-year, $27.6M contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blomfeld</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-85005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blomfeld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-85005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salo, Mitchell, Jovo, Ohlund …

It’s truly unbelievable how “callous and stupid” this Canuckle organization is. Just yesterday while our LA Kings are bringing comrade Penner back to the fold, the “good ole” Canucks are at it again putting a knife into the back of one of their most loyal and trusted defenders. Let it be known friends that this is “exactly” the reason why despite living here, I will “never” support or emotionally invest in this team. To me, the Canucks and their fans are nothing more than a bunch of “Judas’s” whom you should never trust or befriend !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salo, Mitchell, Jovo, Ohlund …</p>
<p>It’s truly unbelievable how “callous and stupid” this Canuckle organization is. Just yesterday while our LA Kings are bringing comrade Penner back to the fold, the “good ole” Canucks are at it again putting a knife into the back of one of their most loyal and trusted defenders. Let it be known friends that this is “exactly” the reason why despite living here, I will “never” support or emotionally invest in this team. To me, the Canucks and their fans are nothing more than a bunch of “Judas’s” whom you should never trust or befriend !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikillchicken</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ikillchicken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 06:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh...what? You just said they shouldn&#039;t build by signing free agents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230;what? You just said they shouldn&#8217;t build by signing free agents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsl22</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsl22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should have spent their money on Matt Carle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have spent their money on Matt Carle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikillchicken</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ikillchicken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 05:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Free agent signings are a stupid way to build your team&quot;

That&#039;s fine in theory but what do you suggest the Canucks actually do? Should they draft a defenceman and then just wait 3-5 years for him to be ready? By then their window to win may be closed and right now they need another top 4 D-Man who can quarterback the powerplay. 

I agree that you can&#039;t make a bad team great through free agency. You need to build your core through the draft. However, free agency must be used after you&#039;ve got your core in place to add the missing pieces. Garrison is one of those missing pieces. Yeah, they over-payed for him, but they can afford to do that because they&#039;ve already built a great and affordable core.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Free agent signings are a stupid way to build your team&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fine in theory but what do you suggest the Canucks actually do? Should they draft a defenceman and then just wait 3-5 years for him to be ready? By then their window to win may be closed and right now they need another top 4 D-Man who can quarterback the powerplay. </p>
<p>I agree that you can&#8217;t make a bad team great through free agency. You need to build your core through the draft. However, free agency must be used after you&#8217;ve got your core in place to add the missing pieces. Garrison is one of those missing pieces. Yeah, they over-payed for him, but they can afford to do that because they&#8217;ve already built a great and affordable core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hitem396</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hitem396]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a little bit overpaid,(not actually overpaid but over-year) but in this thin D market, its ok. still young better than Ballard. Q is,  can he handle his skill for the next 6yrs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a little bit overpaid,(not actually overpaid but over-year) but in this thin D market, its ok. still young better than Ballard. Q is,  can he handle his skill for the next 6yrs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueblood86</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blueblood86]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 03:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big signing by Vancouver.
And he&#039;s better than Shultz.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big signing by Vancouver.<br />
And he&#8217;s better than Shultz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsl22</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsl22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 02:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$4.6MM is not a hometown discount. That is a huge payday for a guy with exactly one year of solid NHL play on his resume. 

I understand he is younger, but that&#039;s more than Salo, Souray, Kuba and Aucoin all got today. They may be older, but you know what you get with them. Garrison? Question marks a plenty. 

Free agent signings are a stupid way to build your team (and I&#039;m not just saying that because the Caps big move was signing Joey Crabb).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$4.6MM is not a hometown discount. That is a huge payday for a guy with exactly one year of solid NHL play on his resume. </p>
<p>I understand he is younger, but that&#8217;s more than Salo, Souray, Kuba and Aucoin all got today. They may be older, but you know what you get with them. Garrison? Question marks a plenty. </p>
<p>Free agent signings are a stupid way to build your team (and I&#8217;m not just saying that because the Caps big move was signing Joey Crabb).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hans2410</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hans2410]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 02:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BU-LL-DO-GS GOOOO BULLDOGS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BU-LL-DO-GS GOOOO BULLDOGS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babar61</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[babar61]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh. I hope he pans out...in getting a little tired of Florida panther players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. I hope he pans out&#8230;in getting a little tired of Florida panther players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imaginesuperbowlwin</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imaginesuperbowlwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Garrison, former UMD BULLDOG!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Garrison, former UMD BULLDOG!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t16rich</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[t16rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Bob McKenzie, Garrison was offered the same money as Wideman, but chose Vancouver at less. Obviously ends up getting paid more then Wideman, but at an extra year and smaller cap hit. If that is true, then yeah it is a home town discount. I do think he is being overpaid, but so is almost everyone being signed right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Bob McKenzie, Garrison was offered the same money as Wideman, but chose Vancouver at less. Obviously ends up getting paid more then Wideman, but at an extra year and smaller cap hit. If that is true, then yeah it is a home town discount. I do think he is being overpaid, but so is almost everyone being signed right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthhamel</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darthhamel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come to think of it Ballard-Tanev fits the same mold as a pairing. They&#039;re obviously the least talented which is why they will be the 3rd pairing, but you can see a similar pattern where Ballard&#039;s career was partially re-vitalized when he was paired with Tanev. Tanev was defensively responsible and could keep up with Ballard&#039;s smooth skating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to think of it Ballard-Tanev fits the same mold as a pairing. They&#8217;re obviously the least talented which is why they will be the 3rd pairing, but you can see a similar pattern where Ballard&#8217;s career was partially re-vitalized when he was paired with Tanev. Tanev was defensively responsible and could keep up with Ballard&#8217;s smooth skating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthhamel</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darthhamel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Garrison has a career 25.9 ppg. Hamhuis has a career 28.8 ppg. 

Given his great year playing a shutdown role with Mike Weaver in the 10-11 season, it might be best to see him as a &quot;Hamhuis&quot;  for Edler. That is a mobile 2-way defenceman who can soak up big minutes while stabilizing a more courageous/reckless D partner. 

It&#039;s got Bieksa&#039;s career back on track, maybe it will get Edler back into &quot;elite defenceman&quot; status.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garrison has a career 25.9 ppg. Hamhuis has a career 28.8 ppg. </p>
<p>Given his great year playing a shutdown role with Mike Weaver in the 10-11 season, it might be best to see him as a &#8220;Hamhuis&#8221;  for Edler. That is a mobile 2-way defenceman who can soak up big minutes while stabilizing a more courageous/reckless D partner. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s got Bieksa&#8217;s career back on track, maybe it will get Edler back into &#8220;elite defenceman&#8221; status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atwatercrushesokoye</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[atwatercrushesokoye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loading up for yet another President&#039;s trophy run, right Canucks fans?  Who needs a Stanley Cup when you have a run of President&#039;s Trophies won...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loading up for yet another President&#8217;s trophy run, right Canucks fans?  Who needs a Stanley Cup when you have a run of President&#8217;s Trophies won&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaksyuk</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zaksyuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yea even on pht]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea even on pht</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaksyuk</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/canucks-hand-jason-garrison-a-splashy-six-year-27-6m-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-84679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zaksyuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=815027#comment-84679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1st, win!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st, win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
