<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Montreal Canadiens are Day 2&#8242;s unofficial draft winners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:24:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegreatgabbert</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thegreatgabbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dalton Thrower is about the same size (6-0, 200), and put up similar point totals to some of the highly ranked defensement taken from the WHL. Murray, Rielly, Dumba, Pouliot, etc. Plus he is more physical than any of them. Hard to see what seperates them really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dalton Thrower is about the same size (6-0, 200), and put up similar point totals to some of the highly ranked defensement taken from the WHL. Murray, Rielly, Dumba, Pouliot, etc. Plus he is more physical than any of them. Hard to see what seperates them really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obamablowz</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[obamablowz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@lordfletcher......how would you call this a &quot;GREAT JOB&quot;?

Nick Leddy 130 games 40 pts 
Erik Haula....did he make NHL yet?
Brett Bulmer...did he make NHL yet?
Zach Phillipsl...did he make NHL yet?
Jason Zucker...did he make NHL yet?
Johan Larsson...did he make NHL yet?
Matt Dumba...drafted 24 hours ago
Matt Hackett...did he make NHL yet?
Charlie Coyle...did he make NHL yet?
Jonas Brodin...did he make NHL yet?
Mikael Granlund....alright I&#039;m done with this!!!

I don&#039;t see where you call this a &quot;GREAT JOB&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lordfletcher&#8230;&#8230;how would you call this a &#8220;GREAT JOB&#8221;?</p>
<p>Nick Leddy 130 games 40 pts<br />
Erik Haula&#8230;.did he make NHL yet?<br />
Brett Bulmer&#8230;did he make NHL yet?<br />
Zach Phillipsl&#8230;did he make NHL yet?<br />
Jason Zucker&#8230;did he make NHL yet?<br />
Johan Larsson&#8230;did he make NHL yet?<br />
Matt Dumba&#8230;drafted 24 hours ago<br />
Matt Hackett&#8230;did he make NHL yet?<br />
Charlie Coyle&#8230;did he make NHL yet?<br />
Jonas Brodin&#8230;did he make NHL yet?<br />
Mikael Granlund&#8230;.alright I&#8217;m done with this!!!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see where you call this a &#8220;GREAT JOB&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obamablowz</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[obamablowz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[....&quot;just saying&quot; is for teenage girls]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.&#8221;just saying&#8221; is for teenage girls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordfletcher</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordfletcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just typed up a huge paragraph that was very detailed and yada yada yada.. then hit reload. ARGH!!!! 

noteworth? I would say Brodin is very noteworthy at this point but that&#039;s not a big issue. 

Again, all I am saying, I trust Fletcher in what he is doing, drafting his guys and building his team. I am not arguing, just speaking thru my Wild glasses. 

cheers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just typed up a huge paragraph that was very detailed and yada yada yada.. then hit reload. ARGH!!!! </p>
<p>noteworth? I would say Brodin is very noteworthy at this point but that&#8217;s not a big issue. </p>
<p>Again, all I am saying, I trust Fletcher in what he is doing, drafting his guys and building his team. I am not arguing, just speaking thru my Wild glasses. </p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomnickle</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tomnickle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granlund and Leddy are the only two who are noteworthy at this point.

When three of those players are making an impact at the NHL level, you may have a case that Chuck Fletcher is doing a great job.  Until that time, he has done nothing more than draft.  There are far more proven talent evaluators in the NHL.

And to that point, if you merely look at the draft record of Trevor Timmins, it&#039;s light years ahead of the list you&#039;ve just cited.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granlund and Leddy are the only two who are noteworthy at this point.</p>
<p>When three of those players are making an impact at the NHL level, you may have a case that Chuck Fletcher is doing a great job.  Until that time, he has done nothing more than draft.  There are far more proven talent evaluators in the NHL.</p>
<p>And to that point, if you merely look at the draft record of Trevor Timmins, it&#8217;s light years ahead of the list you&#8217;ve just cited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordfletcher</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordfletcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for throwing Coyle in there.... he was traded in the Burns deal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for throwing Coyle in there&#8230;. he was traded in the Burns deal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordfletcher</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordfletcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tomnickle


Fletcher has only been drafting with the Wild for 3 years and has been an associate with other programs with a pretty nice resume. 


Fletcher and Flahr I think have done a GREAT JOB in the last 3 years. 

some guys that come to mind

Nick Leddy 
Erik Haula
Brett Bulmer
Zach Phillips
Jason Zucker
Johan Larsson 
Matt Dumba 
Matt Hackett
Charlie Coyle
Jonas Brodin
Mikael Granlund]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tomnickle</p>
<p>Fletcher has only been drafting with the Wild for 3 years and has been an associate with other programs with a pretty nice resume. </p>
<p>Fletcher and Flahr I think have done a GREAT JOB in the last 3 years. </p>
<p>some guys that come to mind</p>
<p>Nick Leddy<br />
Erik Haula<br />
Brett Bulmer<br />
Zach Phillips<br />
Jason Zucker<br />
Johan Larsson<br />
Matt Dumba<br />
Matt Hackett<br />
Charlie Coyle<br />
Jonas Brodin<br />
Mikael Granlund</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomnickle</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tomnickle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of the Amateur Scouting Departments and General Managers in the NHL you trust Chuck Fletcher more than Trevor Timmins and Marc Bergevin?

Do you have anything resembling a firm grasp on prospects in hockey or the NHL draft over the last ten years?

There are some people in hockey that have stellar reputations as scouting gurus.  Chuck Fletcher has never been among them and doesn&#039;t have a body of work sufficient to garner a reputation like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the Amateur Scouting Departments and General Managers in the NHL you trust Chuck Fletcher more than Trevor Timmins and Marc Bergevin?</p>
<p>Do you have anything resembling a firm grasp on prospects in hockey or the NHL draft over the last ten years?</p>
<p>There are some people in hockey that have stellar reputations as scouting gurus.  Chuck Fletcher has never been among them and doesn&#8217;t have a body of work sufficient to garner a reputation like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordfletcher</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordfletcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no doubt.. but you then have to ask yourself, is ISS wrong, or every other GM / scouting dept. in the league. 

I trust ISS but I trust Fletcher for the Wild and his scouting dept more. 


again, on paper, Montreal looks like the new management hit a home run. I will wait 4 years to make my formal review]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no doubt.. but you then have to ask yourself, is ISS wrong, or every other GM / scouting dept. in the league. </p>
<p>I trust ISS but I trust Fletcher for the Wild and his scouting dept more. </p>
<p>again, on paper, Montreal looks like the new management hit a home run. I will wait 4 years to make my formal review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegreatgabbert</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thegreatgabbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Habs landed 5 players that ISS had ranked in their top 50 prospects. Collberg, Galchenyuk, Thrower, Bozon, and Vail. That is in basically the first round and a half as far as ISS is concerned. They are quite reputable as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Habs landed 5 players that ISS had ranked in their top 50 prospects. Collberg, Galchenyuk, Thrower, Bozon, and Vail. That is in basically the first round and a half as far as ISS is concerned. They are quite reputable as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nothanksimdriving123</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nothanksimdriving123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, lord, it will be at least four years before we can reasonably assess which players drafted in later rounds were clearly underrated, and which first-rounders will be able to make the difficult transition from big fish/small pond to big fish/ocean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, lord, it will be at least four years before we can reasonably assess which players drafted in later rounds were clearly underrated, and which first-rounders will be able to make the difficult transition from big fish/small pond to big fish/ocean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordfletcher</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/23/montreal-canadiens-are-day-2s-unofficial-draft-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-82286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordfletcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=789879#comment-82286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is still the most annoying phrase used after drafts in my eyes. There are no winners, not at least for another 4 years. 


but yes, on paper Montreal did very well and I like who they selected when given the opportunity. It also doesn&#039;t hurt that they drafted #33 / 51 / 64 / 94 .... just saying]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is still the most annoying phrase used after drafts in my eyes. There are no winners, not at least for another 4 years. </p>
<p>but yes, on paper Montreal did very well and I like who they selected when given the opportunity. It also doesn&#8217;t hurt that they drafted #33 / 51 / 64 / 94 &#8230;. just saying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
