Skip to content

No power play, no problem for Los Angeles

May 22, 2012, 10:25 AM EDT

St Louis Blues v Los Angeles Kings - Game Three Getty Images

You’d never know it by seeing their 3-1 series lead on the Coyotes, but the Kings have a glaring problem.

Los Angeles’ power play has been nothing but miserable in the playoffs and they’re looking for ways to make it better on the fly. Their lack of success with the man advantage reminds us of how bad the Bruins were last year and them succeeding in spite of it.

Helene Elliott of the Los Angeles Times hears from Drew Doughty about what they can do better on the power play to try and move on to the Stanley Cup finals and perhaps win their first title.

“It’s not always about the bomb or the one-timer or whatever it may be,” Doughty said. “It’s just getting the puck to the net, creating a battle, and Brownie can bang in a rebound or whatever it may be.”

One thing Phoenix has done well is kept the Kings to the outside. Lots of the Kings’ shots have come from far out with no one in front. Making life miserable for Mike Smith is something they’re working on doing better. With all this sort of talk you’d never know the Kings were the team on the brink of winning the series.

  1. 1trojanlove - May 22, 2012 at 10:51 AM

    I will be happy going 0-4 on the power play and win game 5, then going 2 for 2 and lose 3-2. I hope our road warriors come to play tonight…. Go Kings Go!!!

  2. oside760 - May 22, 2012 at 11:00 AM

    the kings might rely on the long shot but in game 4 there was like 15 shots that rebounded off of smith and were just sitting there in front of the net and no kings players got on em. thats the one thing they need to change. GET THE F***ING REBOUND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. namriverrat69 - May 22, 2012 at 11:44 AM

    The Kings didn’t play their best game Sunday. It should be a whole different team tonight.

    LONG LIVE THE KINGS!!!!!!!

Featured video

Bettman hears the boos in Philly
Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. S. Crosby (1978)
  2. L. Stempniak (1853)
  3. D. Roy (1571)
  4. A. Rome (1428)
  5. R. O'Reilly (1426)
  1. C. Franson (1415)
  2. D. Booth (1302)
  3. R. Nash (1170)
  4. P. Subban (1136)
  5. M. Ribeiro (1063)