<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No NHL tenant required to build new Seattle arena</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/16/no-nhl-tenant-required-to-build-new-seattle-arena/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/16/no-nhl-tenant-required-to-build-new-seattle-arena/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmoe5150</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/16/no-nhl-tenant-required-to-build-new-seattle-arena/comment-page-1/#comment-73904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mmoe5150]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=515459#comment-73904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is absolutely good news for hockey in Seattle. If the deal required both NBA and NHL teams be acquired to start construction on the facility, it would never happen. The chances of bringing both teams in the same time window are almost non-existent. Bringing NBA will be a much easier first step because there&#039;s already a viable short term venue for them to play in; Key Arena. The Key won&#039;t be good enough for even temporarily housing an NHL team (as anyone who watched the WHL Thunderbirds play in there would attest), so the only way we get NHL is if the facility already is built. 

Get the NBA team, build the new facility, then get the NHL team. That sounds like a much more likely sequence than getting both at the same time. The way I see it, the city allowing the deal to not hinge on having both means the facility will likely be a done deal and eventually NHL will be in Seattle. The moment the City Council approves the deal, Hansen can start the next step; get the Sonics (either by relocation or the less likely expansion). They then move into the Key while the arena construction starts, giving Hansen nearly 3 years to get the NHL end lined up while the construction is in progress. They could very likely still have an NHL team there for the first available season!

If the city required both NBA and NHL to begin construction, I think the arena deal would have been dead in the water, which would have meant no chance at the NHL in Seattle. Plus, there is still a $75 million dollar incentive for Hansen to have both, since he would be on the hook for the King County portion if only the NBA is there ($5 million vs. $80 million). That&#039;s a pretty big incentive to get an NHL partner involved. This was good news indeed for both NBA and NHL fans.

As to the availability of an NHL franchise to move, whether there is or not I find it hard to believe the NHL would even consider moving a team until the shovels are in the ground. It would be pointless to negotiate until there is no longer any uncertainty as to when a viable facility is going to be in place and open for business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is absolutely good news for hockey in Seattle. If the deal required both NBA and NHL teams be acquired to start construction on the facility, it would never happen. The chances of bringing both teams in the same time window are almost non-existent. Bringing NBA will be a much easier first step because there&#8217;s already a viable short term venue for them to play in; Key Arena. The Key won&#8217;t be good enough for even temporarily housing an NHL team (as anyone who watched the WHL Thunderbirds play in there would attest), so the only way we get NHL is if the facility already is built. </p>
<p>Get the NBA team, build the new facility, then get the NHL team. That sounds like a much more likely sequence than getting both at the same time. The way I see it, the city allowing the deal to not hinge on having both means the facility will likely be a done deal and eventually NHL will be in Seattle. The moment the City Council approves the deal, Hansen can start the next step; get the Sonics (either by relocation or the less likely expansion). They then move into the Key while the arena construction starts, giving Hansen nearly 3 years to get the NHL end lined up while the construction is in progress. They could very likely still have an NHL team there for the first available season!</p>
<p>If the city required both NBA and NHL to begin construction, I think the arena deal would have been dead in the water, which would have meant no chance at the NHL in Seattle. Plus, there is still a $75 million dollar incentive for Hansen to have both, since he would be on the hook for the King County portion if only the NBA is there ($5 million vs. $80 million). That&#8217;s a pretty big incentive to get an NHL partner involved. This was good news indeed for both NBA and NHL fans.</p>
<p>As to the availability of an NHL franchise to move, whether there is or not I find it hard to believe the NHL would even consider moving a team until the shovels are in the ground. It would be pointless to negotiate until there is no longer any uncertainty as to when a viable facility is going to be in place and open for business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bleedingteal4life</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/16/no-nhl-tenant-required-to-build-new-seattle-arena/comment-page-1/#comment-73819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bleedingteal4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=515459#comment-73819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Seattle had a hockey team it would become the new Jerusalem!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Seattle had a hockey team it would become the new Jerusalem!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yarjator</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/16/no-nhl-tenant-required-to-build-new-seattle-arena/comment-page-1/#comment-73700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yarjator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=515459#comment-73700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hah, college graduates.

&quot;Why even call plays on the last drive of a football game? Just throw it to your best receiver!&quot; That&#039;s you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, college graduates.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why even call plays on the last drive of a football game? Just throw it to your best receiver!&#8221; That&#8217;s you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supr49er</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/16/no-nhl-tenant-required-to-build-new-seattle-arena/comment-page-1/#comment-73686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[supr49er]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=515459#comment-73686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another West Coast team would be fantastic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another West Coast team would be fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nothanksimdriving123</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/16/no-nhl-tenant-required-to-build-new-seattle-arena/comment-page-1/#comment-73676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nothanksimdriving123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=515459#comment-73676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can anyone please explain why 5 college graduates need three 60-second reminders in the last minute of a game that they are losing and would benefit from repeatedly getting the ball into the hoop, and should perhaps try to get it to an open player, ideally their best shooter? Just curious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone please explain why 5 college graduates need three 60-second reminders in the last minute of a game that they are losing and would benefit from repeatedly getting the ball into the hoop, and should perhaps try to get it to an open player, ideally their best shooter? Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffalomafia</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/16/no-nhl-tenant-required-to-build-new-seattle-arena/comment-page-1/#comment-73659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buffalomafia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=515459#comment-73659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[C&#039;mon! Get a hockey team too! 

Basketball is boreing! The last minute of the game lasts longer than the first 3 quarters!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon! Get a hockey team too! </p>
<p>Basketball is boreing! The last minute of the game lasts longer than the first 3 quarters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
