<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Caps&#8217; shot blocking style result in Rangers&#8217; winning goal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/07/did-caps-shot-blocking-style-result-in-rangers-winning-goal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/07/did-caps-shot-blocking-style-result-in-rangers-winning-goal/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/07/did-caps-shot-blocking-style-result-in-rangers-winning-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-70705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=438914#comment-70705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats why when you block a shot you have to get all of it. If you only get a piece, there is a good chacne its going to end up in your own net. 

Of course the Rangers would have 20-25 more shots on net if the Caps weren&#039;t blocking shots, so its a risk-reward kind of thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats why when you block a shot you have to get all of it. If you only get a piece, there is a good chacne its going to end up in your own net. </p>
<p>Of course the Rangers would have 20-25 more shots on net if the Caps weren&#8217;t blocking shots, so its a risk-reward kind of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpelle82</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/07/did-caps-shot-blocking-style-result-in-rangers-winning-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-70619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpelle82]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=438914#comment-70619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[comes with the territory, the players cant be upset about the way it went in.  when you buy into this type of game, you know what can happen and you accept that this is a possibility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comes with the territory, the players cant be upset about the way it went in.  when you buy into this type of game, you know what can happen and you accept that this is a possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barkar942</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/07/did-caps-shot-blocking-style-result-in-rangers-winning-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-70582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[barkar942]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=438914#comment-70582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rangers shot block like crazy in front of Lundqvist and Biron, and if you go through every goal scored this season on the two goalies, you will find that quite a high percentage are either deflected in by the opposing team or off of a Ranger player trying to block the shot. This time, it just backfired against the Caps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rangers shot block like crazy in front of Lundqvist and Biron, and if you go through every goal scored this season on the two goalies, you will find that quite a high percentage are either deflected in by the opposing team or off of a Ranger player trying to block the shot. This time, it just backfired against the Caps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
