Comments on: Tippett on Torres appeal: “No reaction at all”

By: lsxphotog

lsxphotog — Fri, 04 May 2012 17:58:44 +0000

They’re playing just fine without him…and they don’t have to pay him while he’s suspended. It’s no shock that the Coyotes are acting this way.

By: monarch897

monarch897 — Fri, 04 May 2012 12:55:33 +0000

Torres should be out of hockey all together the guy is a menace and just doesn’t get it. Every year it’s the same thing; deciding what to do with him after he has almost ended another players career. Subsequently the team that took him on decides they don’t want him to be a part of their image. Maybe Philly would be a good fit for Raffi boy.

By: barkar942

barkar942 — Fri, 04 May 2012 03:28:06 +0000

Won’t it be a conflict of interest for the team owner to hear the appeal for his own player? Guess we had better hope the sale of the Yotes go through quickly so Betman isn’t his team owner at the hearing.

By: James O'Brien

James O'Brien — Fri, 04 May 2012 01:37:43 +0000

Thanks for the catches folks. Fixed.

By: puckyouall

puckyouall — Fri, 04 May 2012 01:14:28 +0000

This article is a total mess. Made no sense as stated by other above. Writing too much too fast perhaps?

By: Doesnotmatter

Doesnotmatter — Fri, 04 May 2012 00:55:14 +0000

“Inconsequential,” Torres said. Wasn’t that Tippett?

By: Doesnotmatter

Doesnotmatter — Fri, 04 May 2012 00:46:24 +0000

Philadelphia Coyotes? You might want to change that.

By: philly4lyfe

philly4lyfe — Fri, 04 May 2012 00:37:54 +0000

I know you assume all dirty plays are by people wearing orange and black, but come on! The Philadelphia coyotes?

By: bag217

bag217 — Fri, 04 May 2012 00:26:10 +0000

When did the Coyotes move to Philadelphia?