Comments on: David Booth channels Teddy Roosevelt in defeat http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/david-booth-channels-teddy-roosevelt-in-defeat/ ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com Sun, 26 May 2013 05:11:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: marlin1894 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/david-booth-channels-teddy-roosevelt-in-defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-64454 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:14:33 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=318543#comment-64454 habsman

Typical non-American snobbery.

]]> By: habsman http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/david-booth-channels-teddy-roosevelt-in-defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-64283 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:02:18 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=318543#comment-64283 Typical American Clown.

]]> By: bcisleman http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/david-booth-channels-teddy-roosevelt-in-defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-64265 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:59:10 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=318543#comment-64265 If I am not mistaken, that quote has been applied to Jackie Robinson.

]]> By: hawkeytown http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/david-booth-channels-teddy-roosevelt-in-defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-64260 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:37:22 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=318543#comment-64260 I couldn’t care less about the quote….I’m just overjoyed that the name “A Burrows” will not appear on the Stanley Cup for at least one more year. Don’t want that punk spoiling the “J Toews, P Sharp & M Hossa” from 2010….

]]> By: sjsharksfan11 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/david-booth-channels-teddy-roosevelt-in-defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-64258 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:30:28 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=318543#comment-64258 Patrick Marleau is next unless he does his usual hiding in a hole…..

]]> By: hky15 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/david-booth-channels-teddy-roosevelt-in-defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-64255 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:27:14 +0000 http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=318543#comment-64255 That quote is absolutely right!

]]>