<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brian Elliott&#8217;s strong argument for Blues&#8217; No. 1 job: three shutouts in a row</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostpuppysyndrome</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostpuppysyndrome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go Blues.  If there&#039;s a team I want to win the Cup this year (the odds aren&#039;t in favor for the Jets), it&#039;s the Blues.  Heck, they&#039;ve been in the league long enough.  Plus it&#039;s another team that&#039;s won the Cup more recently than Toronto.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Blues.  If there&#8217;s a team I want to win the Cup this year (the odds aren&#8217;t in favor for the Jets), it&#8217;s the Blues.  Heck, they&#8217;ve been in the league long enough.  Plus it&#8217;s another team that&#8217;s won the Cup more recently than Toronto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostpuppysyndrome</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostpuppysyndrome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gahhhhh, why can&#039;t the Jets play like this???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gahhhhh, why can&#8217;t the Jets play like this???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danphipps01</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danphipps01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to wonder how high a return Elliott would fetch if Hitch dealt him in the offseason. He signed him to a two-year extension, right? And at a rate that, say, the Capitals would be drooling over - only $1.8m. 

It&#039;s not going to happen - Hitch clearly wants to keep this tandem for the future - but his system could make a lot of guys look this good, not just Elliott. It&#039;s worth keeping in mind, especially if he goes with Elliott in the playoffs and the guy puts together a hot streak while everyone&#039;s watching.

Or he could just keep the guy and have the most absurdly broken pairing in NHL goaltending. Good problem to have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to wonder how high a return Elliott would fetch if Hitch dealt him in the offseason. He signed him to a two-year extension, right? And at a rate that, say, the Capitals would be drooling over &#8211; only $1.8m. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not going to happen &#8211; Hitch clearly wants to keep this tandem for the future &#8211; but his system could make a lot of guys look this good, not just Elliott. It&#8217;s worth keeping in mind, especially if he goes with Elliott in the playoffs and the guy puts together a hot streak while everyone&#8217;s watching.</p>
<p>Or he could just keep the guy and have the most absurdly broken pairing in NHL goaltending. Good problem to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timgodfreycomedy</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timgodfreycomedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[as a st. louis boy and avid blues fan since 2001, watching my Blues get this good feels amazing. i think elliot and halak feed off of each others performances and sharpen each others skills by pushing one another. you cant have a starter and backup, theyre too good. mix them up and reel in the wins]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a st. louis boy and avid blues fan since 2001, watching my Blues get this good feels amazing. i think elliot and halak feed off of each others performances and sharpen each others skills by pushing one another. you cant have a starter and backup, theyre too good. mix them up and reel in the wins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firstandonlywarning</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[firstandonlywarning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Blues as a team is just awesome to watch, the force nearly every shot to the outside. Both Blues goalies are not even making tough stops. At the end you figure &quot;of course they shut them out&quot;
Rarely the D allows guys into front banging away, rarely is the initial shot tough that whoever is in net can&#039;t control the rebound. They are making it look easy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Blues as a team is just awesome to watch, the force nearly every shot to the outside. Both Blues goalies are not even making tough stops. At the end you figure &#8220;of course they shut them out&#8221;<br />
Rarely the D allows guys into front banging away, rarely is the initial shot tough that whoever is in net can&#8217;t control the rebound. They are making it look easy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22bju</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[22bju]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said jmj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said jmj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmjdefiant1</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmjdefiant1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is everybody obsessed with &quot;primary&quot; &amp; &quot;secondary(or backup)&quot; goalies??? We have the best tandem in franchise history.(going back to 1969)These two work extremely well together. I say let them continue to support and push each other to accomplish even greater achievements.(Like the Stanley Cup)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everybody obsessed with &#8220;primary&#8221; &amp; &#8220;secondary(or backup)&#8221; goalies??? We have the best tandem in franchise history.(going back to 1969)These two work extremely well together. I say let them continue to support and push each other to accomplish even greater achievements.(Like the Stanley Cup)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geo91</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geo91]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Playoff hockey is a lot different than regular season, St. Louis has a lot to prove still and I&#039;m looking forward to seeing how they handle it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playoff hockey is a lot different than regular season, St. Louis has a lot to prove still and I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing how they handle it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leeo00</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leeo00]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[!!!!!!!!!ELLIOTNETMONSTER!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>!!!!!!!!!ELLIOTNETMONSTER!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1943mrmojorisin1971</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/brian-elliotts-strong-argument-for-blues-no-1-job-three-shutouts-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-49186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1943mrmojorisin1971]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=137857#comment-49186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know there&#039;s a lot to be said for the Blues&#039; system, but damn, that is a TON of shutout hockey. 3 straight, 27 shots on average. Very impressive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there&#8217;s a lot to be said for the Blues&#8217; system, but damn, that is a TON of shutout hockey. 3 straight, 27 shots on average. Very impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
