<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brent Sutter didn&#8217;t take Flames&#8217; latest loss very well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/23/brent-sutter-didnt-take-flames-latest-loss-very-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/23/brent-sutter-didnt-take-flames-latest-loss-very-well/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrcan13</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/23/brent-sutter-didnt-take-flames-latest-loss-very-well/comment-page-1/#comment-48208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrcan13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=133574#comment-48208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned to danp - Their shootout record using those players is 3W and 9L – he tried something different and he was wrong. Had he used the same players and lost yet again people would have been on him for doing that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned to danp &#8211; Their shootout record using those players is 3W and 9L – he tried something different and he was wrong. Had he used the same players and lost yet again people would have been on him for doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrcan13</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/23/brent-sutter-didnt-take-flames-latest-loss-very-well/comment-page-1/#comment-48207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrcan13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=133574#comment-48207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their shootout record using those players is 3W and 9L - he tried something different and he was wrong. Had he used the same players and lost yet again people would have been on him for doing that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shootout record using those players is 3W and 9L &#8211; he tried something different and he was wrong. Had he used the same players and lost yet again people would have been on him for doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoarce7</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/23/brent-sutter-didnt-take-flames-latest-loss-very-well/comment-page-1/#comment-48190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hoarce7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=133574#comment-48190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite frankly maybe it should be the other way around, meaning the can kicked the crap out of Sutter. Really do any of the Sutter brothers have a reputable coaching resume to write home about for the time any of them have held a head coaching position in the NHL? Not to my way of thinking and furthermore none of them would be at the top of my list as a coahcing candidate for my team if I owned one. Quality players yes, head coaches however are a different kettle of fish and in my opinion none of the Sutters have the fins for this type of job at this particular level.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite frankly maybe it should be the other way around, meaning the can kicked the crap out of Sutter. Really do any of the Sutter brothers have a reputable coaching resume to write home about for the time any of them have held a head coaching position in the NHL? Not to my way of thinking and furthermore none of them would be at the top of my list as a coahcing candidate for my team if I owned one. Quality players yes, head coaches however are a different kettle of fish and in my opinion none of the Sutters have the fins for this type of job at this particular level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danphipps01</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/23/brent-sutter-didnt-take-flames-latest-loss-very-well/comment-page-1/#comment-48084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danphipps01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=133574#comment-48084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iginla, Jokinen, Tanguay, Giordano, all would&#039;ve been smarter choices. Jesus, Sutter&#039;s an idiot. He threw that game with that insane selection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iginla, Jokinen, Tanguay, Giordano, all would&#8217;ve been smarter choices. Jesus, Sutter&#8217;s an idiot. He threw that game with that insane selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason9696</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/23/brent-sutter-didnt-take-flames-latest-loss-very-well/comment-page-1/#comment-48073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jason9696]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=133574#comment-48073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not a big Flames fan.  But why wasn&#039;t Jerome Iginla used in the shootout?  He&#039;s far and away their best player.  You mine as well go down with your best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big Flames fan.  But why wasn&#8217;t Jerome Iginla used in the shootout?  He&#8217;s far and away their best player.  You mine as well go down with your best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
