<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM Meetings: Removal of trapezoid gaining some support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/gm-meetings-removal-of-trapezoid-gaining-some-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/gm-meetings-removal-of-trapezoid-gaining-some-support/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bensawesomeness</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/gm-meetings-removal-of-trapezoid-gaining-some-support/comment-page-1/#comment-45425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bensawesomeness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 05:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109758#comment-45425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your guy&#039;s ideas better anyway]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your guy&#8217;s ideas better anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluesfan72</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/gm-meetings-removal-of-trapezoid-gaining-some-support/comment-page-1/#comment-45411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluesfan72]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109758#comment-45411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the occasional hockey viewer the game is confusing enough. I think having different rules for each conference would only make it seem more confusing. I&#039;m all for getting rid of the trapezoid, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the occasional hockey viewer the game is confusing enough. I think having different rules for each conference would only make it seem more confusing. I&#8217;m all for getting rid of the trapezoid, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pens919209</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/gm-meetings-removal-of-trapezoid-gaining-some-support/comment-page-1/#comment-45385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pens919209]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109758#comment-45385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you said, in baseball there&#039;s not as much inter-league play as there is inter-conference play in the NHL. Having the rules change for teams on such an arbitrary basis would probably yield misleading results - either good or bad. Imagine playing one night against a Western Conference team where there&#039;s no trapezoid but the icing rule is still a touch-up one, then the next night playing an Eastern Conference team where there&#039;s hybrid icing - but hey! - the trapezoid is back. It&#039;d be confusing and frustrating for the players, coaches, and the fans. 

Try it in the AHL as itsallniceonice says, or test it in pre-season games. That&#039;d be the way to go with these changes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you said, in baseball there&#8217;s not as much inter-league play as there is inter-conference play in the NHL. Having the rules change for teams on such an arbitrary basis would probably yield misleading results &#8211; either good or bad. Imagine playing one night against a Western Conference team where there&#8217;s no trapezoid but the icing rule is still a touch-up one, then the next night playing an Eastern Conference team where there&#8217;s hybrid icing &#8211; but hey! &#8211; the trapezoid is back. It&#8217;d be confusing and frustrating for the players, coaches, and the fans. </p>
<p>Try it in the AHL as itsallniceonice says, or test it in pre-season games. That&#8217;d be the way to go with these changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsallniceonice</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/gm-meetings-removal-of-trapezoid-gaining-some-support/comment-page-1/#comment-45382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itsallniceonice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109758#comment-45382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They just need to actually agree on something and test it out in the AHL like they have before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They just need to actually agree on something and test it out in the AHL like they have before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bensawesomeness</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/12/gm-meetings-removal-of-trapezoid-gaining-some-support/comment-page-1/#comment-45379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bensawesomeness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109758#comment-45379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So baseball has the DH in one league and not the other, along with Bean balls in one and not the other. 

I always thought they should try out the rule changes with the conferences each getting one rule and not the other, and playing it out over 1 season to see how it goes. I know baseball is vastly different than hockey, and the East and West play more often than AL and NL, but i always thought it was a really good way to see if things are better with or without a rule, or even try it in the preseason. 

For example, East Conference gets no-touch icing, West gets the Trapezoid removed ( or Fighting, this stupid red line idea, or 10 min overtime with 4 on 4 or 3 on 3 ) 

Dont have to throw everything away for it, you get a solid amount of data and results from it, and nobody cries if you change it back after a season]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So baseball has the DH in one league and not the other, along with Bean balls in one and not the other. </p>
<p>I always thought they should try out the rule changes with the conferences each getting one rule and not the other, and playing it out over 1 season to see how it goes. I know baseball is vastly different than hockey, and the East and West play more often than AL and NL, but i always thought it was a really good way to see if things are better with or without a rule, or even try it in the preseason. </p>
<p>For example, East Conference gets no-touch icing, West gets the Trapezoid removed ( or Fighting, this stupid red line idea, or 10 min overtime with 4 on 4 or 3 on 3 ) </p>
<p>Dont have to throw everything away for it, you get a solid amount of data and results from it, and nobody cries if you change it back after a season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
