Comments on: Quenneville: “Clearly, the refereeing was tough to watch”

By: salmon90

salmon90 — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:11:57 +0000

Maybe someone should show Quenneville the video of Big Buff pitchforking Luongo into the goal a couple of years ago in the playoffs. The second vid looked like a penalty but there’s no way in the first one the puck was covered up. Kings shut em out and he was grumpy so he whined. End of story.

By: comeonnowguys

comeonnowguys — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:42:53 +0000

Yeah, because if there’s one thing Quenneville has shown over the years, is that he’s consistently a sore loser. Yammerhead.

By: oside760

oside760 — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:52:43 +0000

what a sore loser. you got your ass beat fair and square son

By: howiehandles

howiehandles — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:47:36 +0000

The second one was definitely a penalty, but the first, seems Crawford just didn’t hold ht puck, nor did the Hawks dmen clear the forwards from the crease. That being said, I couldn’t tell if he had the puck, and somewhat hit it out from under him, that’s the refs job.

If the Hawks could have freaking scored, this wouldn’t have been an issue —>Hawks fan

By: comeonnowguys

comeonnowguys — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:19:13 +0000

Quenneville isn’t usually one to throw bombs at the refs in the press after the game.

I’m not sure that was interference on the first goal, but…

There was a too many men on the ice right before that which similarly would have prevented that goal that was not called. When I heard that Quenneville was complaining about the first goal, that’s what I assumed it was about.

It’s usually not worth talking about bad or non-calls because they balance themselves out in most games that aren’t NBA, but there just seemed to be a bunch of bad or iffy calls go against the Hawks last night, and not much against the Kings.

It happens. It just sucks when it does.