<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flames turn back clock, reunite Iginla and Jokinen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/03/flames-turn-back-clock-reunite-iginla-and-jokinen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/03/flames-turn-back-clock-reunite-iginla-and-jokinen/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danphipps01</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/03/flames-turn-back-clock-reunite-iginla-and-jokinen/comment-page-1/#comment-19224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danphipps01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=53857#comment-19224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all fairness, letting Cammy go was wise. He was going to be expensive as hell and like Jeff Carter or Rick Nash, he needs a dedicated feed man to really produce. When he has one, he absolutely will - but Calgary didn&#039;t want to reduce Iggy to Cammy&#039;s set-up man, which was more or less what happened during the run with that line. Iggy&#039;s assists shot up, but you don&#039;t mention how far his own goal total plunged - he was shooting a lot less and passing to Cammy on a lot of chances he&#039;d normally take himself. For Calgary, it wasn&#039;t worth it. They would have wound up dropping six million a year on his new contract and without anyone else even remotely capable of feeding him the puck, they would have had to use Iggy as his feed man - basically, they didn&#039;t have a playmaking centre and so Cammy&#039;s production would have had to have come at the cost of Iginla&#039;s. Jokinen didn&#039;t pan out as hoped and they just couldn&#039;t justify Cammy&#039;s cost without a better way to use him. It was the right move.

The revolving-door hilarity with Jokinen, though, was just typical agonizingly bad Calgary GMing. Oh well. Made for all kinds of great punchlines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all fairness, letting Cammy go was wise. He was going to be expensive as hell and like Jeff Carter or Rick Nash, he needs a dedicated feed man to really produce. When he has one, he absolutely will &#8211; but Calgary didn&#8217;t want to reduce Iggy to Cammy&#8217;s set-up man, which was more or less what happened during the run with that line. Iggy&#8217;s assists shot up, but you don&#8217;t mention how far his own goal total plunged &#8211; he was shooting a lot less and passing to Cammy on a lot of chances he&#8217;d normally take himself. For Calgary, it wasn&#8217;t worth it. They would have wound up dropping six million a year on his new contract and without anyone else even remotely capable of feeding him the puck, they would have had to use Iggy as his feed man &#8211; basically, they didn&#8217;t have a playmaking centre and so Cammy&#8217;s production would have had to have come at the cost of Iginla&#8217;s. Jokinen didn&#8217;t pan out as hoped and they just couldn&#8217;t justify Cammy&#8217;s cost without a better way to use him. It was the right move.</p>
<p>The revolving-door hilarity with Jokinen, though, was just typical agonizingly bad Calgary GMing. Oh well. Made for all kinds of great punchlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
