<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Flames aren&#8217;t technically &#8220;shopping&#8221; Rene Bourque</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/the-flames-arent-technically-shopping-rene-bourque/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/the-flames-arent-technically-shopping-rene-bourque/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:44:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danphipps01</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/the-flames-arent-technically-shopping-rene-bourque/comment-page-1/#comment-18485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danphipps01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 03:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=52363#comment-18485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, there&#039;s a guy a lot of teams would headhunt. He&#039;s scoring in the high twenties and offering respectable physical presence in CALGARY - a team with no real centres and to which players go to let their numbers die. It&#039;s the statistical equivalent of an elephant graveyard and he still does reasonably well there. He&#039;ll be a great asset for SOMEONE, just... not a team that pretty much makes people worse when they play there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, there&#8217;s a guy a lot of teams would headhunt. He&#8217;s scoring in the high twenties and offering respectable physical presence in CALGARY &#8211; a team with no real centres and to which players go to let their numbers die. It&#8217;s the statistical equivalent of an elephant graveyard and he still does reasonably well there. He&#8217;ll be a great asset for SOMEONE, just&#8230; not a team that pretty much makes people worse when they play there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gillon</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/the-flames-arent-technically-shopping-rene-bourque/comment-page-1/#comment-18457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Gillon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=52363#comment-18457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. That team might not even be recognizable in two years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That team might not even be recognizable in two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbear42</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/the-flames-arent-technically-shopping-rene-bourque/comment-page-1/#comment-18451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigbear42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=52363#comment-18451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Montreal should be jumping all over this,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montreal should be jumping all over this,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatswellydoing</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/the-flames-arent-technically-shopping-rene-bourque/comment-page-1/#comment-18450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whatswellydoing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=52363#comment-18450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just six players past next season? Nuts, I was hoping Calgary was screwed for longer than that... Well maybe they&#039;ll make a run at the playoffs, pick up more toxic contracts and then finish 9th.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just six players past next season? Nuts, I was hoping Calgary was screwed for longer than that&#8230; Well maybe they&#8217;ll make a run at the playoffs, pick up more toxic contracts and then finish 9th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
