<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Kelly supports raising the draft age to 19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/paul-kelly-supports-raising-the-draft-age-to-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/paul-kelly-supports-raising-the-draft-age-to-19/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danphipps01</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/paul-kelly-supports-raising-the-draft-age-to-19/comment-page-1/#comment-18481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danphipps01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 03:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=52387#comment-18481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, my knee-jerk &quot;That&#039;s terrible shut up&quot; reaction having subsided, he might have something there. Then again, as you say, how do you judge who&#039;s &quot;elite&quot; enough? Plenty of #1-5 picks have turned out to be nobodies, so if the draft&#039;s already THAT hit and miss, how will scouts be expected to accurately single out which 18-year olds can or can&#039;t handle it?

Love any reform that involves giving Bob McKenzie a sword and the right to pass judgment, though. That&#039;s just too awesome not to get behind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, my knee-jerk &#8220;That&#8217;s terrible shut up&#8221; reaction having subsided, he might have something there. Then again, as you say, how do you judge who&#8217;s &#8220;elite&#8221; enough? Plenty of #1-5 picks have turned out to be nobodies, so if the draft&#8217;s already THAT hit and miss, how will scouts be expected to accurately single out which 18-year olds can or can&#8217;t handle it?</p>
<p>Love any reform that involves giving Bob McKenzie a sword and the right to pass judgment, though. That&#8217;s just too awesome not to get behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sknut</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/25/paul-kelly-supports-raising-the-draft-age-to-19/comment-page-1/#comment-18468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sknut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=52387#comment-18468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t really think this was an issue and don&#039;t see it as a big deal. There is enough vetting of prospects to get an idea of if he can handle the mental side along with the physical side.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t really think this was an issue and don&#8217;t see it as a big deal. There is enough vetting of prospects to get an idea of if he can handle the mental side along with the physical side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
