<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the Colorado Avalanche for real? No, probably not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/18/are-the-colorado-avalanche-for-real-no-probably-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/18/are-the-colorado-avalanche-for-real-no-probably-not/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:46:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danphipps01</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/18/are-the-colorado-avalanche-for-real-no-probably-not/comment-page-1/#comment-18004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danphipps01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51228#comment-18004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys, we get that they won five road games. They also won four of those against teams ranging from &quot;average&quot; (Montreal and, surprisingly, Toronto) to &quot;so awful it&#039;s funny&quot; (unsurprisingly, Ottawa) - and they went 6-5 with the Canadiens, who have like four players who break the 20-mark each season. They SUCK at scoring, and the Avs let them get five. Beating Toronto to kill their hot streak was fairly impressive, but it&#039;s still Toronto - not exactly a top-tier team. And Boston? Well, LOOK at them. They&#039;re losing to EVERYONE right now and their spectacular meltdown against Carolina just shows that they are no longer in Stanley Cup form. The Avs are a LOT better this year and talk of a Capitals lottery pick has been permanently silenced with the explosive performance of their young core forwards and Varlamov&#039;s apparent comfort in a first-string role - but they&#039;re still only beating fairly weak squads. They&#039;re not going to pull the moves they&#039;ve pulled against the real contenders - against Chicago, Vancouver, San Jose, Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Buffalo... they&#039;re going to lose.

Things, however, are still positive. The Pens and Caps got knocked over in the first couple years after getting Crosby, Malkin, Ovi, etc., and look where they are now. In three years, the Avs are going to be very, very scary. They aren&#039;t a contender yet, but the teams that have adopted this strategy to building their rosters started slow and are now at the top of the NHL. The Avs are going to get there, and it won&#039;t be long in coming - but it won&#039;t be this season. I&#039;m very excited to see them come back to contention. I always loved the Sakic glory years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, we get that they won five road games. They also won four of those against teams ranging from &#8220;average&#8221; (Montreal and, surprisingly, Toronto) to &#8220;so awful it&#8217;s funny&#8221; (unsurprisingly, Ottawa) &#8211; and they went 6-5 with the Canadiens, who have like four players who break the 20-mark each season. They SUCK at scoring, and the Avs let them get five. Beating Toronto to kill their hot streak was fairly impressive, but it&#8217;s still Toronto &#8211; not exactly a top-tier team. And Boston? Well, LOOK at them. They&#8217;re losing to EVERYONE right now and their spectacular meltdown against Carolina just shows that they are no longer in Stanley Cup form. The Avs are a LOT better this year and talk of a Capitals lottery pick has been permanently silenced with the explosive performance of their young core forwards and Varlamov&#8217;s apparent comfort in a first-string role &#8211; but they&#8217;re still only beating fairly weak squads. They&#8217;re not going to pull the moves they&#8217;ve pulled against the real contenders &#8211; against Chicago, Vancouver, San Jose, Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Buffalo&#8230; they&#8217;re going to lose.</p>
<p>Things, however, are still positive. The Pens and Caps got knocked over in the first couple years after getting Crosby, Malkin, Ovi, etc., and look where they are now. In three years, the Avs are going to be very, very scary. They aren&#8217;t a contender yet, but the teams that have adopted this strategy to building their rosters started slow and are now at the top of the NHL. The Avs are going to get there, and it won&#8217;t be long in coming &#8211; but it won&#8217;t be this season. I&#8217;m very excited to see them come back to contention. I always loved the Sakic glory years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tkhinton</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/18/are-the-colorado-avalanche-for-real-no-probably-not/comment-page-1/#comment-17960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tkhinton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51228#comment-17960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are not giving enough value to the vast improvement they have made in the offseason. They beat 5 of 6. They look like a team that wants to compete. Those deserve a bullet point, don&#039;t you think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not giving enough value to the vast improvement they have made in the offseason. They beat 5 of 6. They look like a team that wants to compete. Those deserve a bullet point, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wingshater21</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/18/are-the-colorado-avalanche-for-real-no-probably-not/comment-page-1/#comment-17956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wingshater21]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51228#comment-17956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ohhh yeah, negativity,  and this coming from a Canucks fan, nice]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh yeah, negativity,  and this coming from a Canucks fan, nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgeinlimbo</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/18/are-the-colorado-avalanche-for-real-no-probably-not/comment-page-1/#comment-17945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgeinlimbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51228#comment-17945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m an Avs fan and I do not think the Avalanche will win the President’s Trophy this year. However, I think they’ll make the playoffs.

What Halford didn’t mention is that Duchene still hasn’t started heating up yet. His play in his own zone has shown a lot of improvement and he still looks quick and creative when he is in the attacking zone. It is only a matter of time before he starts putting up more serious points.

Also, Jones has already proven he can remain healthy and has been a consistent force, even after the collapse last year. If anything, the health of Peter Mueller is more concerning. The Avalanche have one of the best third lines in the league in the first six games with Landeskog/O’Reilly/Winnik setting the tone for the rest of the team.

Kyle Quincey is highly underrated and Ryan O’Byrne has proven dependable, even though he takes the occasional penalty. Hejda is solid and Wilson is a serious NHLer. The team has meshed well with a mean O’Brien. Plus, they are big. Quincey and Johnson can both put up some offensive numbers.

This team won’t contend, but are bound to surprise some fans and win others back. They are still on the tail end of a rebuild, but the true identity of this team is emerging. They are realizing their going to be mean and hard to play against in their own end, and fast and energetic at the other end. Halford, you are going to eat your words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m an Avs fan and I do not think the Avalanche will win the President’s Trophy this year. However, I think they’ll make the playoffs.</p>
<p>What Halford didn’t mention is that Duchene still hasn’t started heating up yet. His play in his own zone has shown a lot of improvement and he still looks quick and creative when he is in the attacking zone. It is only a matter of time before he starts putting up more serious points.</p>
<p>Also, Jones has already proven he can remain healthy and has been a consistent force, even after the collapse last year. If anything, the health of Peter Mueller is more concerning. The Avalanche have one of the best third lines in the league in the first six games with Landeskog/O’Reilly/Winnik setting the tone for the rest of the team.</p>
<p>Kyle Quincey is highly underrated and Ryan O’Byrne has proven dependable, even though he takes the occasional penalty. Hejda is solid and Wilson is a serious NHLer. The team has meshed well with a mean O’Brien. Plus, they are big. Quincey and Johnson can both put up some offensive numbers.</p>
<p>This team won’t contend, but are bound to surprise some fans and win others back. They are still on the tail end of a rebuild, but the true identity of this team is emerging. They are realizing their going to be mean and hard to play against in their own end, and fast and energetic at the other end. Halford, you are going to eat your words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmuzia</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/18/are-the-colorado-avalanche-for-real-no-probably-not/comment-page-1/#comment-17933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mmuzia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51228#comment-17933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll take a 5-0 road trip under any circumstances.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take a 5-0 road trip under any circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
