Skip to content

Trendy Sabres vs. defending champion Bruins: Who’s the favorite in the Northeast?

Oct 6, 2011, 12:00 PM EDT

Paul Gaustad, Andrew Ference AP

When it comes to making playoff predictions or choosing players in fantasy hockey, it’s just so much more fun to side with a trendy pick. Sure, it was probably the right move to select Ray Rice in the first round in fantasy football, but it didn’t provide the visceral thrill of a riskier move.

Many hockey pundits are locked in debates regarding the Northeast Division favorite: is it wiser to side with the defending champion Boston Bruins or the Buffalo Sabres (the champions of splashy off-season moves)? From what I gathered, a startling amount are going chic with the Sabres. (A few might even lean toward the Montreal Canadiens, which is batty if you consider their defense but intriguing when you ponder their easier schedule.)

It’s tough to figure out why people are discounting the Bruins after they won the 2011 Stanley Cup. Maybe it’s because the focus of that championship round shifted toward Roberto Luongo‘s meltdowns rather than Tim Thomas‘ brilliance. Perhaps the problem is that the Bruins were good during the 2010-11 season, but they weren’t overwhelming favorites like the last three champions. The Bruins’ biggest stars are a huge defenseman and an unorthodox goalie, so maybe the hunger for marquee offensive talent has something to do with it.

Either way, it is a tough race to call.

The case for the champs

The Bruins feature the best defenseman in Zdeno Chara. You can generate hours of debate about which team has the better American star in net, but the Bruins’ combined duo gets the nod because Tuukka Rask is more proven than Jhonas Enroth. Boston’s group of centers is impressive even with Marc Savard hurtling toward retirement; one assumes that the hockey world will give Patrice Bergeron and David Krejci more respect sooner or later. Derek Roy should be outstanding if he is 100 percent, but the Sabres’ pivots don’t seem quite as sturdy – especially if Ville Leino ends up being their second line center, as many expect. (That’s not to say that Tyler Ennis and Nathan Gerbe lack talent if they’re in center spots this season – it’s just that they’re likely to get pushed around defensively.)

Depth is the key in Buffalo

That’s not to say that Buffalo goes into this battle without any weapons, though. Their advantage can be summarized with one word: depth. Their defense is much more versatile now that they added Christian Ehrhoff and Robyn Regehr. Leino complements an offense that has a plethora of dangerous wingers, from Thomas Vanek to Jason Pominville and Drew Stafford.

The depth argument does make some sense in the regular season, but it’s still surprising to see so many people brush off the Bruins’ hardware – mainly because people usually follow champions like lemmings.

In a way, this is battle between change and stability. The Sabres seem radically different while the Bruins only made minor alterations to a team that won three seven-game series and their first Cup since the days of Bobby Orr. Picking Boston isn’t as fun as siding with Buffalo, but if you ask me, it’s the best bet.

  1. billyhoyle4real - Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM

    Buffalo Sabres are going to win Lord Stanley’s Cup!!! Get after it.

  2. skoobyfl - Oct 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM

    I’ve been preaching depth on here for months. Take one player, anyone off each teams roster against the Sabres. You won’t bet against Buffalo then & you shouldn’t now.

  3. trbowman - Oct 7, 2011 at 3:52 PM

    I’d love to see a Kings/Sabres cup matchup. Two teams that haven’t won one. Definitely within the realm of possibilty.

  4. hatrickswayze - Oct 10, 2011 at 1:11 AM

    umm skooby, ill take marc savard off the bruins roster, oh ya thats right we did last year and still figured out how to win, with or without our powerplay. i love whats going on in buffalo as much as the next guy, but its two games into the season.how about we dont go crazy…

Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. C. Price (1906)
  2. J. Harding (1885)
  3. M. Staal (1745)
  4. J. Giguere (1680)
  5. J. Thornton (1490)
  1. A. Ekblad (1398)
  2. B. Bishop (1327)
  3. J. Spezza (1300)
  4. A. Semin (1292)
  5. C. MacArthur (1263)