<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rangers spend big again, land Brad Richards with 9-year, $60M blockbuster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flavadave10</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flavadave10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 03:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If he can come back from his concussion strong, this should be a nice deal since it&#039;s front loaded. If he doesn&#039;t, this will probably get Sather fired.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he can come back from his concussion strong, this should be a nice deal since it&#8217;s front loaded. If he doesn&#8217;t, this will probably get Sather fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 02:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thing is, there are some serious questions behind Richards. Hes only scored 91 points twice, never scored more then 28 goals, had a serious injury last year after which his production fell a little bit, and hes 31 years old. 

I agree the Rangers need a top line center, but I don&#039;t agree the Rangers needed Richards. What if hes never the same after his concusion last year? What a waste of money that would be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, there are some serious questions behind Richards. Hes only scored 91 points twice, never scored more then 28 goals, had a serious injury last year after which his production fell a little bit, and hes 31 years old. </p>
<p>I agree the Rangers need a top line center, but I don&#8217;t agree the Rangers needed Richards. What if hes never the same after his concusion last year? What a waste of money that would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 02:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well in fairness Stamkos contract ended this year.... Richards won&#039;t be making more then him for long. Stamkos is going to get the big bucks this summer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well in fairness Stamkos contract ended this year&#8230;. Richards won&#8217;t be making more then him for long. Stamkos is going to get the big bucks this summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 02:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It could definatlly be said that the game has passed Sather by. He did a great job with the Oilers... but has been a nightmare for the Rangers. Not to say he hasn&#039;t done some good things with the Rangers, but his blunders over the last few years are so bad its hard to remember what hes done right in NY.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could definatlly be said that the game has passed Sather by. He did a great job with the Oilers&#8230; but has been a nightmare for the Rangers. Not to say he hasn&#8217;t done some good things with the Rangers, but his blunders over the last few years are so bad its hard to remember what hes done right in NY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyncsports</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyncsports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me being a Ranger fan, I want this to work and it will. Brad is 31 and has maybe 4 or 5 really good years a head of him. &quot;if he doesn&#039;t get hurt again&quot;. Sign Cal and Dubie and it&#039;s a wrap!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me being a Ranger fan, I want this to work and it will. Brad is 31 and has maybe 4 or 5 really good years a head of him. &#8220;if he doesn&#8217;t get hurt again&#8221;. Sign Cal and Dubie and it&#8217;s a wrap!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atwatercrushesokoye</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[atwatercrushesokoye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 19:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s ironic is that year after year in Edmonton, Sather did a good job of working with a limited budget and putting together competitive teams (talking about after the dynasty days) and it led to his reputation as one of if not the best GM in the game during that time.

Then he goes to the Rangers with an unlimited budget and he turns into the second worst GM in hockey, Garth Snow being the worst...Darryl Sutter was also worse before the Flames finally fired him.  

It&#039;s not as if the Rangers are a bad team, but if Sather had gone to New York and used the same skills that he used in Edmonton, rather than just trying to throw money at &quot;stars&quot; the Rangers would have won some Stanley Cups during his tenure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s ironic is that year after year in Edmonton, Sather did a good job of working with a limited budget and putting together competitive teams (talking about after the dynasty days) and it led to his reputation as one of if not the best GM in the game during that time.</p>
<p>Then he goes to the Rangers with an unlimited budget and he turns into the second worst GM in hockey, Garth Snow being the worst&#8230;Darryl Sutter was also worse before the Flames finally fired him.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not as if the Rangers are a bad team, but if Sather had gone to New York and used the same skills that he used in Edmonton, rather than just trying to throw money at &#8220;stars&#8221; the Rangers would have won some Stanley Cups during his tenure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonofsamiam</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sonofsamiam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sedins making less than Richards is reasonable when you take into consideration the fact that Brad has a cup  ring and won&#039;t be taking diving penalties or half a dozen unanswered punches to the face from a undersized rookie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sedins making less than Richards is reasonable when you take into consideration the fact that Brad has a cup  ring and won&#8217;t be taking diving penalties or half a dozen unanswered punches to the face from a undersized rookie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theghostofwillisreed</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theghostofwillisreed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the deal is front-loaded. he can be bought out later and there is no guarantee he plays to forty years old anyway.

it&#039;s nine years for  58.5 million

the rangers were not the highest bidder. calgary was.

i&#039;ll take an overrated player who scores 91 points like richards on my team any day of the week. 

i&#039;m not a brad richards fan but the blueshirts needed him]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the deal is front-loaded. he can be bought out later and there is no guarantee he plays to forty years old anyway.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s nine years for  58.5 million</p>
<p>the rangers were not the highest bidder. calgary was.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll take an overrated player who scores 91 points like richards on my team any day of the week. </p>
<p>i&#8217;m not a brad richards fan but the blueshirts needed him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpelle82</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpelle82]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ribiero was the better center anyway]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ribiero was the better center anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpelle82</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpelle82]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thats a lot of money for a guy with ok numbers and old.  getting paid more than henrik and daniel, datsyuk and zetterberg, st louis and stamkos.  wow.  some of the best tandems and they all had more pts and assists than he does and they all make less.  genius.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats a lot of money for a guy with ok numbers and old.  getting paid more than henrik and daniel, datsyuk and zetterberg, st louis and stamkos.  wow.  some of the best tandems and they all had more pts and assists than he does and they all make less.  genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpelle82</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpelle82]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good luck signing both.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good luck signing both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sippindasyzurp</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sippindasyzurp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didnt Richards say he wanted to go to a stanley cup contender?? Dont the rangers fight for 8th place every year?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didnt Richards say he wanted to go to a stanley cup contender?? Dont the rangers fight for 8th place every year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sather should be fired... plain and simple. 

He wanted Richards soooo bad that he gave him a deal thats far worse then the Gomez, or Drury deals. Sure Richards is a better play then those two, but hes not THAT much better. 

Couple things to point out: 

1. Richards might never be the same after his concusion last year... and he might in fact be more prone to suffering another one. 

2. Richards will have a $6.5 million cap hit when he is 35-40. Talk about a massive waste of cap space. 

3. The Rangers are most certainly gonna have to let some of their young talent walk now. Dubinsky, Anisimov, Callahan, Boyle, Saure, Gillroy..... can&#039;t keep them all now, which is a mistake. Richards might provide a boost for a couple years, but you can&#039;t expect him to be a top player into his mid/late 30&#039;s. However, the Rangers young talent is likely to keep growing over the next few years into the core of a team that could win cups... don&#039;t expect Richards to drastically increase that possibility. 

4. The Rangers history with such signings should have been a massive, and I mean massive, warning sign. No team (actually no GM) has continued to make such horrible &quot;blockbuster&quot; free agent signings that have turned into garbage. Everyone knows the obvious ones, but hell even Gaborik looked bad last year. You could make the agument he was hurt, but Sather KNEW Gaborik was injury prone when he threw a $7.5 mil a year deal at him. Its getting annoying seeing how often Sather just runs out and signs the most expensive player hoping for results. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As a Rangers fan obviously I want this to work out... but its not going to. Richards never was a super star. He had a couple solid seasons, but he never put up massive numbers. Odds are he only has a couple years of peek performance left before his play starts falling off..... all the while the Rangers have to pay for declining numbers. On top of that, the Rangers young core they have been grooming over the last few years is certain to take a hit given the poor cap management by Sather. 

Want to see a deal happen that will give the Rangers a real shot at winning the cup? Fire Sather.... becuase its not going to happen while hes still there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sather should be fired&#8230; plain and simple. </p>
<p>He wanted Richards soooo bad that he gave him a deal thats far worse then the Gomez, or Drury deals. Sure Richards is a better play then those two, but hes not THAT much better. </p>
<p>Couple things to point out: </p>
<p>1. Richards might never be the same after his concusion last year&#8230; and he might in fact be more prone to suffering another one. </p>
<p>2. Richards will have a $6.5 million cap hit when he is 35-40. Talk about a massive waste of cap space. </p>
<p>3. The Rangers are most certainly gonna have to let some of their young talent walk now. Dubinsky, Anisimov, Callahan, Boyle, Saure, Gillroy&#8230;.. can&#8217;t keep them all now, which is a mistake. Richards might provide a boost for a couple years, but you can&#8217;t expect him to be a top player into his mid/late 30&#8242;s. However, the Rangers young talent is likely to keep growing over the next few years into the core of a team that could win cups&#8230; don&#8217;t expect Richards to drastically increase that possibility. </p>
<p>4. The Rangers history with such signings should have been a massive, and I mean massive, warning sign. No team (actually no GM) has continued to make such horrible &#8220;blockbuster&#8221; free agent signings that have turned into garbage. Everyone knows the obvious ones, but hell even Gaborik looked bad last year. You could make the agument he was hurt, but Sather KNEW Gaborik was injury prone when he threw a $7.5 mil a year deal at him. Its getting annoying seeing how often Sather just runs out and signs the most expensive player hoping for results. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>As a Rangers fan obviously I want this to work out&#8230; but its not going to. Richards never was a super star. He had a couple solid seasons, but he never put up massive numbers. Odds are he only has a couple years of peek performance left before his play starts falling off&#8230;.. all the while the Rangers have to pay for declining numbers. On top of that, the Rangers young core they have been grooming over the last few years is certain to take a hit given the poor cap management by Sather. </p>
<p>Want to see a deal happen that will give the Rangers a real shot at winning the cup? Fire Sather&#8230;. becuase its not going to happen while hes still there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You act like $16 million is a lot of cap space for the Rangers right now. Its not. Callahan and Dubinsky both had good years last season... and are going to want a raise. 

Callahan had 23 goals and 48 points, while missing 20 games... so he likely would have had 60 points and nearly 30 goals. Hes going to want 5-6 million this time around. Dubinsky had 24 goals and 54 points in 77 games. Hes also going to get a raise, and probably want 5-6 million this year. Also, you have to remember that they are RFAs... meaning other teams can make them offers that the Rangers would have to match. Its not crazy to think someone could make a very high one or two year offer considering theres not a lot of good UFAs out there. If that happens the Rangers are really screwed. 

Lets assume for a second that the Rangers gave both Cally and Dubinsky $5 mil each. That leaves the Rangers with just $6 mil in cap space. With that, they still need to sign a couple defensemen.... and what about Anisimov and Boyle? Both looked really good last year, and Anisimov has a future as a great goal scorer. Are the Rangers ready to let yet another young talent walk to sign an over the hill super star? 

Spin it how you like, but there is no &quot;done deal&quot; when it comes to re-signing Cally and Dubinsky. Odds are one of them is going to be walking out of town.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You act like $16 million is a lot of cap space for the Rangers right now. Its not. Callahan and Dubinsky both had good years last season&#8230; and are going to want a raise. </p>
<p>Callahan had 23 goals and 48 points, while missing 20 games&#8230; so he likely would have had 60 points and nearly 30 goals. Hes going to want 5-6 million this time around. Dubinsky had 24 goals and 54 points in 77 games. Hes also going to get a raise, and probably want 5-6 million this year. Also, you have to remember that they are RFAs&#8230; meaning other teams can make them offers that the Rangers would have to match. Its not crazy to think someone could make a very high one or two year offer considering theres not a lot of good UFAs out there. If that happens the Rangers are really screwed. </p>
<p>Lets assume for a second that the Rangers gave both Cally and Dubinsky $5 mil each. That leaves the Rangers with just $6 mil in cap space. With that, they still need to sign a couple defensemen&#8230;. and what about Anisimov and Boyle? Both looked really good last year, and Anisimov has a future as a great goal scorer. Are the Rangers ready to let yet another young talent walk to sign an over the hill super star? </p>
<p>Spin it how you like, but there is no &#8220;done deal&#8221; when it comes to re-signing Cally and Dubinsky. Odds are one of them is going to be walking out of town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peanutflower</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peanutflower]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hockey owners world has lost its mind.  Ridiculous.  But hey, we&#039;ve got two of the other five best passers in the NHL in Van couver and they sure didn&#039;t cost $58 million.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hockey owners world has lost its mind.  Ridiculous.  But hey, we&#8217;ve got two of the other five best passers in the NHL in Van couver and they sure didn&#8217;t cost $58 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nittanylion0</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nittanylion0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice try with the whole &quot;rain on the parade&quot; thing there, fino.  The Rangers have been looking to make this whole Richards thing work for months now.  I have no doubt they figured out a way to make it work... and it looks like their plan was to get a front-loaded deal to maybe back-load some deals for the other, equally important guys like Cally and Dubi.  The Rangers absolutely needed to make this move if they had any interest in not wasting Henrik&#039;s time on Broadway.  They need Richards&#039; passing skills, they need him to set up Gabby.  I hope this works, because if it does... this team is going to be very dangerous next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try with the whole &#8220;rain on the parade&#8221; thing there, fino.  The Rangers have been looking to make this whole Richards thing work for months now.  I have no doubt they figured out a way to make it work&#8230; and it looks like their plan was to get a front-loaded deal to maybe back-load some deals for the other, equally important guys like Cally and Dubi.  The Rangers absolutely needed to make this move if they had any interest in not wasting Henrik&#8217;s time on Broadway.  They need Richards&#8217; passing skills, they need him to set up Gabby.  I hope this works, because if it does&#8230; this team is going to be very dangerous next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanktheking</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hanktheking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fino delfino you&#039;re a complete idiot. Callahan will be wearing the &quot;C&quot; next year and Duby will be his linemate. Everyone better pray Richards is a bust, otherwise the Rangers will be extremely dangerous next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fino delfino you&#8217;re a complete idiot. Callahan will be wearing the &#8220;C&#8221; next year and Duby will be his linemate. Everyone better pray Richards is a bust, otherwise the Rangers will be extremely dangerous next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanktheking</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hanktheking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good luck signing Callahan and Dubinsky? 2 guys who have grown up in the organization, love playing for Torts and have both stated they want to be Rangers for life. Factor in 16 million dollars of cap space remaining and the fact the team just landed another superstar to push for the cup. 

You don&#039;t need luck when things are a done deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck signing Callahan and Dubinsky? 2 guys who have grown up in the organization, love playing for Torts and have both stated they want to be Rangers for life. Factor in 16 million dollars of cap space remaining and the fact the team just landed another superstar to push for the cup. </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t need luck when things are a done deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finodelfino</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/02/rangers-spend-big-again-land-brad-richards-with-9-year-58-5m-blockbuster/comment-page-1/#comment-13413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finodelfino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=42120#comment-13413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good luck resigning Callahan and Dubinsky. I&#039;ll give it 4 years until sather buys out Richards contract...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck resigning Callahan and Dubinsky. I&#8217;ll give it 4 years until sather buys out Richards contract&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
