<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First look at the 2011 Stanley Cup finals: Are the Bruins the junior varsity Canucks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/28/first-look-at-the-2011-stanley-cup-finals-are-the-bruins-the-junior-varsity-canucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/28/first-look-at-the-2011-stanley-cup-finals-are-the-bruins-the-junior-varsity-canucks/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: graves9</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/28/first-look-at-the-2011-stanley-cup-finals-are-the-bruins-the-junior-varsity-canucks/comment-page-1/#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[graves9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 06:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=38803#comment-11279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calling the Bruins a JV version of Vancouver is laughable. It&#039;s easy to look at the Nucks&#039; stats this year in the regular season and turn into a bumbling fanboy. But let&#039;s be honest...Bruins are the better 5-on-5 team statistically in these playoffs (the best in these playoffs, actually); the teams have nearly identical PK percentages (and don&#039;t try to tell me that stopping the Sharks, Preds and Blackhawks was more difficult than stopping Tampa, the Flyers, and Montreal); and in truth, it&#039;s all about matchups. If you think that Kevin Bieksa and Dan Hamhuis are going to shut down the Lucic-Krejci-Horton line, you have to be delusional. That line is large, physical, and shifty- they are difficult to contain along the boards when they are on top of their game. Also, you should watch Patrice Bergeron more- his decision making along the boards and his ability to win draws and battles makes him just as formidable as Kesler, albeit in a different way.

The Canucks better hope their secondary scoring is up to the challenge, considering Chara and Seidenberg- especially Seidenberg- are not going to give the Sedin twins an inch to operate in back of the net. That renders Burrows relatively harmless. Kesler will create a mismatch with the B&#039;s second pairing, but I don&#039;t think Christopher Higgins or Mason Raymond will be morphing into Pavel Bure circa 1994 anytime soon. In the end, the Bs&#039; two-way forwards (especially the two newly-acquired ones) will be the unsung heroes of this series- meet Chris Kelly and Rich Peverley. 

Yes, I am a Bruins fan; to readers, please do not think that I am unaware of Vancouver&#039;s skill and successes. I am merely arguing that calling the B&#039;s Vancouver-lite, especially when they beat Vancouver this year 3-1, is moronic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling the Bruins a JV version of Vancouver is laughable. It&#8217;s easy to look at the Nucks&#8217; stats this year in the regular season and turn into a bumbling fanboy. But let&#8217;s be honest&#8230;Bruins are the better 5-on-5 team statistically in these playoffs (the best in these playoffs, actually); the teams have nearly identical PK percentages (and don&#8217;t try to tell me that stopping the Sharks, Preds and Blackhawks was more difficult than stopping Tampa, the Flyers, and Montreal); and in truth, it&#8217;s all about matchups. If you think that Kevin Bieksa and Dan Hamhuis are going to shut down the Lucic-Krejci-Horton line, you have to be delusional. That line is large, physical, and shifty- they are difficult to contain along the boards when they are on top of their game. Also, you should watch Patrice Bergeron more- his decision making along the boards and his ability to win draws and battles makes him just as formidable as Kesler, albeit in a different way.</p>
<p>The Canucks better hope their secondary scoring is up to the challenge, considering Chara and Seidenberg- especially Seidenberg- are not going to give the Sedin twins an inch to operate in back of the net. That renders Burrows relatively harmless. Kesler will create a mismatch with the B&#8217;s second pairing, but I don&#8217;t think Christopher Higgins or Mason Raymond will be morphing into Pavel Bure circa 1994 anytime soon. In the end, the Bs&#8217; two-way forwards (especially the two newly-acquired ones) will be the unsung heroes of this series- meet Chris Kelly and Rich Peverley. </p>
<p>Yes, I am a Bruins fan; to readers, please do not think that I am unaware of Vancouver&#8217;s skill and successes. I am merely arguing that calling the B&#8217;s Vancouver-lite, especially when they beat Vancouver this year 3-1, is moronic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
