Skip to content

Report: Atlanta Spirit,True North negotiating deal; Thrashers could relocate to Winnipeg

May 16, 2011, 2:47 PM EST

thrasherslogo

The rumors have been flying for quite some time now, but it seems like there’s fire to back up all that smoke. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Chris Vivlamore reports that the Atlanta Spirit and True North are indeed negotiating a deal that could relocate the Atlanta Thrashers to Winnipeg.

Vivlamore points out that a deal hasn’t been completed and it is unclear how long the two sides have been negotiating, but it’s possible that the Thrashers could be relocated in time for the 2011-12 season.

The factors described in the report itself aren’t exactly “new.” After all, Joe already took a look at what the NHL’s divisional realignment might look like if the Thrashers moved to the ‘Peg. That being said, this not-quite-confirmed story that appeared in The Atlanta-Journal Constitution gives more concrete credibility to the rumors.

“I have never confirmed nor denied specific parties we have been talking to in regards to a possible sale of the Thrashers,” Atlanta Spirit co-owner Bruce Levenson told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution Monday.

Typically, confidentiality agreements are signed between parties in negotiations which would prohibit Atlanta Spirit ownership from identifying suitors.

NHL Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly, reach via e-mail, said there was “nothing I’m prepared to say at this point.” A True North Sports and Entertainment spokesperson had no comment.

Jeff Schultz expanded on the subject in a column for the AJC, pointing out that the outlook is grim but the move isn’t set in stone, either. Schultz mapped out three scenarios that could keep the Thrashers in Atlanta.

♦ 1.) A financial angel falls out of the sky. But thus far, no prospective owner has come forward with both a stated desire to buy the team and proof of his financial worth.

♦ 2.) Something falls apart on the Winnipeg end (with True North), or from the league’s perspective (other owners may be uncomfortable with the fact new local ownership for the Coyotes still isn’t assured).

♦ 3.) Bettman effectively stalls and gives the Atlanta franchise a one-year stay of execution, telling Levenson and the Spirit that the franchise can’t be moved for next season. It’s not believed the Atlanta Spirit could just walk away from the hockey team and throw the keys to the league. So it’s not certain what would happen if Bettman disallowed a move right now and the Spirit resisted.

While this situation doesn’t technically need to be resolved at a specific point, the league needs to put together a schedule for the 2011-12 season soon. Considering how antsy the Spirit is to get rid of the team (to be fair, they’ve reported losses in the $130 million range), they want to sell the Thrashers as soon as possible.

In other words, this story could develop really quickly.

Again, no deal is official yet. That being said, Thrashers fans must accept the possibility that their team really might move to Winnipeg this summer.

  1. trbowman - May 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM

    Go Winnipeg!

    Atlanta has always been a lame sports city.

  2. trigdaddy - May 16, 2011 at 6:35 PM

    I’d rather see them stay in ATL but what happens, happens. If they do move to Winnipeg I hope they change their name. Winnipeg Thrashers doesnt have a nice ring to it.

  3. bigtull - May 17, 2011 at 2:26 AM

    I don’t get why Atl can’t support the Thrashers. Winnipeg is almost 10x smaller than Atl and may not support another team any better than it supported the Jets. Part of the reason the Jets couldn’t make it in the league is because the players didn’t like Winnipegs location and small market atmosphere. Also, if the economy goes south again, there is not enough population in Winnipeg to keep the team solvent.

Featured video

Coaches in and out of the hot seat

Sign up for Fantasy hockey

Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. V. Hedman (2818)
  2. P. Sharp (2621)
  3. P. Datsyuk (2344)
  4. P. Dupuis (2026)
  5. S. Crosby (2014)
  1. J. Harding (1889)
  2. D. Krejci (1818)
  3. B. Dubinsky (1803)
  4. Z. Chara (1741)
  5. B. Marchand (1673)