<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nothing makes sense: Chris Kunitz and Steve Downie each receive one-game suspensions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:06:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fflnick</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fflnick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You can’t arbitrarily decide something in the rule books as a two minute penalty is suddenly 20 games.&quot;
FYI- The NHL previously suspended him 20 games for the McAmmond hit.

&quot;The hit was deliberate, dangerous and has no place in our league. He crossed a line in a wholehearted way. 
Colin Campbell on the Downie/ McAmmond hit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can’t arbitrarily decide something in the rule books as a two minute penalty is suddenly 20 games.&#8221;<br />
FYI- The NHL previously suspended him 20 games for the McAmmond hit.</p>
<p>&#8220;The hit was deliberate, dangerous and has no place in our league. He crossed a line in a wholehearted way.<br />
Colin Campbell on the Downie/ McAmmond hit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fflnick</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fflnick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That mentality is what I was referring to.
Because he didn&#039;t do severe damage to the player, it&#039;s only 1 game.

&quot;His 20 game suspension he led with his head.&quot;
Disagree. He led with his shoulder both times. They are the exact same hits. 
The difference is the damage done. One is preseason, the other a playoff game.
Check it out below.

Downie hit on McAmmond
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=322zqTkL0-c

Downie hit on Lovejoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKM9s230HiE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That mentality is what I was referring to.<br />
Because he didn&#8217;t do severe damage to the player, it&#8217;s only 1 game.</p>
<p>&#8220;His 20 game suspension he led with his head.&#8221;<br />
Disagree. He led with his shoulder both times. They are the exact same hits.<br />
The difference is the damage done. One is preseason, the other a playoff game.<br />
Check it out below.</p>
<p>Downie hit on McAmmond<br />
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='635' height='388' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/322zqTkL0-c?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>Downie hit on Lovejoy<br />
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='635' height='388' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/yKM9s230HiE?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psujay</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[psujay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the rules it&#039;s a charging penalty.  You can&#039;t arbitrarily decide something in the rule books as a two minute penalty is suddenly 20 games.  His 20 game suspension he led with his head.  This is quite different. Lovejoy was braced against the boards and saw him coming.  He left his feet.  That&#039;s a two minute penalty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the rules it&#8217;s a charging penalty.  You can&#8217;t arbitrarily decide something in the rule books as a two minute penalty is suddenly 20 games.  His 20 game suspension he led with his head.  This is quite different. Lovejoy was braced against the boards and saw him coming.  He left his feet.  That&#8217;s a two minute penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fflnick</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fflnick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will only comment on Downie specifically since I am familiar with him.

I would have made an example of Downie.
Yes, history should always count not wipe clean.
He happen to hit a taller/ &quot;heavier&quot; player this time which thankfully limited the damage.
He intent/ actions was the same as his previous history.

Just because a player is smaller in height doesn&#039;t mean launching yourself like a missile is acceptable.
Considering how big of a problem concussion are, the NHL has to adapt more with the research.
If not they actually will open themselves up to litigation from a retired player that they knew concussions are a problem and have not done enough to protect the players.
  
I would have given him the same 20 game suspension he previously received with a stern warning to him and all other players.
&quot;Launching yourself will not occur in the game.&quot;  

Other attempted head shots would receive similar non tolerance suspensions.

The lack of consistency in upholding the rules has haunted the NHL. Sometime you feel like one is watching boxing or WWE. Sometimes it even reminds me of a battered woman making excuses for the act. 
You question the legitimacy of the sport when their is not a consistent playing field one it comes to enforcing rules. 
The reactionary measure of calling penalties and suspensions has to change. (ie. Stick to face 2 min. Draw blood 5 min) Stick to the face is a stick to the face. It&#039;s passive. 

By nature penalties and suspensions are PREVENTIVE measures?  
You want to reduce injury you enforce the rules firmly. 
You want to get rid of it come down hard on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will only comment on Downie specifically since I am familiar with him.</p>
<p>I would have made an example of Downie.<br />
Yes, history should always count not wipe clean.<br />
He happen to hit a taller/ &#8220;heavier&#8221; player this time which thankfully limited the damage.<br />
He intent/ actions was the same as his previous history.</p>
<p>Just because a player is smaller in height doesn&#8217;t mean launching yourself like a missile is acceptable.<br />
Considering how big of a problem concussion are, the NHL has to adapt more with the research.<br />
If not they actually will open themselves up to litigation from a retired player that they knew concussions are a problem and have not done enough to protect the players.</p>
<p>I would have given him the same 20 game suspension he previously received with a stern warning to him and all other players.<br />
&#8220;Launching yourself will not occur in the game.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Other attempted head shots would receive similar non tolerance suspensions.</p>
<p>The lack of consistency in upholding the rules has haunted the NHL. Sometime you feel like one is watching boxing or WWE. Sometimes it even reminds me of a battered woman making excuses for the act.<br />
You question the legitimacy of the sport when their is not a consistent playing field one it comes to enforcing rules.<br />
The reactionary measure of calling penalties and suspensions has to change. (ie. Stick to face 2 min. Draw blood 5 min) Stick to the face is a stick to the face. It&#8217;s passive. </p>
<p>By nature penalties and suspensions are PREVENTIVE measures?<br />
You want to reduce injury you enforce the rules firmly.<br />
You want to get rid of it come down hard on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psujay</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[psujay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[after 18 months your slate is wiped clean, so Downie is NOT a repeat offender.  Also, it was a 2 minute charging penalty, nothing more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after 18 months your slate is wiped clean, so Downie is NOT a repeat offender.  Also, it was a 2 minute charging penalty, nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derpdederpdederp</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[derpdederpdederp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hmm seems to me they both got off easy here. leaving your feet to hit has always been illegal, downies a repeat offender who shouldve gotten at least 2 games. the hit by kunitz is the exact garbage the nhl keeps saying it wants to get out of the game so he shouldve been out for at least the first round, 5 games, or anything more substantial than 1 game]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm seems to me they both got off easy here. leaving your feet to hit has always been illegal, downies a repeat offender who shouldve gotten at least 2 games. the hit by kunitz is the exact garbage the nhl keeps saying it wants to get out of the game so he shouldve been out for at least the first round, 5 games, or anything more substantial than 1 game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you completely.  My point earlier was that the people who are making a total mess of these decisions are not casual fans, but seasoned pros - insiders. The guy above made a comment about length of suspensions, and you dismissed him because he&#039;s a &quot;casual fan.&quot;  Then you turn around and write another post that was somewhat in agreement with his sentiments.  I think the NHL is an insular place, which is very much in need of some fresh meat.  Maybe taking a little input from outsiders might be useful (note, I did not say a committee of outsiders should be the commissioner and that rule changes should be open to public vote on a website).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you completely.  My point earlier was that the people who are making a total mess of these decisions are not casual fans, but seasoned pros &#8211; insiders. The guy above made a comment about length of suspensions, and you dismissed him because he&#8217;s a &#8220;casual fan.&#8221;  Then you turn around and write another post that was somewhat in agreement with his sentiments.  I think the NHL is an insular place, which is very much in need of some fresh meat.  Maybe taking a little input from outsiders might be useful (note, I did not say a committee of outsiders should be the commissioner and that rule changes should be open to public vote on a website).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was speaking to the comment I replyed to.. nothing more. But since you mention it no, people who know little about the game and have never played it should have absolutely no input when it comes to rules about said game. 

As for the current rules... its not the rules that are the problem, its their enforcment thats broken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was speaking to the comment I replyed to.. nothing more. But since you mention it no, people who know little about the game and have never played it should have absolutely no input when it comes to rules about said game. </p>
<p>As for the current rules&#8230; its not the rules that are the problem, its their enforcment thats broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I give up... I really do. I would say the NHL lost the rest of its credibility with this ruleing, but it didn&#039;t have any left to lose. 

First of all the Kunitz hit: How the hell does the NHL get away with a one game suspension for this hit? If this was last year, then it wouldn&#039;t be an issue. However, this year there is suppose to be a huge effort to crack down on blind side shots to the head of an opponent, especially when they are intentional. What else could you call this? It was an intentional effort to deliver an elbow to the head of an unsuspecting player, from the blind side. Not to mention it was a VERY late hit. That screams &quot;throw the book at him&quot;... yet the league only gave one game? What the hell is that about? I know Bettman cheers for Pittsburgh every year but this is a huge joke. 

Second the Downie hit: I don&#039;t think there was anything worth of a suspension here. It wasn&#039;t a headshot (despite the fact the league claims it was), and you see hits like this all the time... and as was pointed out the Torres hit was a lot worse, yet Torres recieved no suspension. Yes, Downie left his feel and has a history so I guess the league is justified in giving a suspension, but Torres was playing in his first game back from a 4 game suspension and again, walked without punishment. Then, even if you accept Downie deserved a one game suspension because of his past... Kunitz hit was far worse, yet he was given the same length suspension. 

Im dizzy just thinking about all this. There is clearly something REALLY wrong with the NHL and how it decides suspensions. None of their last three calls make any sense when compared with eachother, and then when compared with other punishments form the rest of the year make even less sense. If the NHL is actually serious when it comes to doing something about headshots, and wants to get its credability back there needs to be a massive overhaul in how suspensions are handed out.  You can&#039;t talk tough on headhots and then balk when it comes to a hit like the one Kunitz delivered. I think a shakeup in NHL management is needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give up&#8230; I really do. I would say the NHL lost the rest of its credibility with this ruleing, but it didn&#8217;t have any left to lose. </p>
<p>First of all the Kunitz hit: How the hell does the NHL get away with a one game suspension for this hit? If this was last year, then it wouldn&#8217;t be an issue. However, this year there is suppose to be a huge effort to crack down on blind side shots to the head of an opponent, especially when they are intentional. What else could you call this? It was an intentional effort to deliver an elbow to the head of an unsuspecting player, from the blind side. Not to mention it was a VERY late hit. That screams &#8220;throw the book at him&#8221;&#8230; yet the league only gave one game? What the hell is that about? I know Bettman cheers for Pittsburgh every year but this is a huge joke. </p>
<p>Second the Downie hit: I don&#8217;t think there was anything worth of a suspension here. It wasn&#8217;t a headshot (despite the fact the league claims it was), and you see hits like this all the time&#8230; and as was pointed out the Torres hit was a lot worse, yet Torres recieved no suspension. Yes, Downie left his feel and has a history so I guess the league is justified in giving a suspension, but Torres was playing in his first game back from a 4 game suspension and again, walked without punishment. Then, even if you accept Downie deserved a one game suspension because of his past&#8230; Kunitz hit was far worse, yet he was given the same length suspension. </p>
<p>Im dizzy just thinking about all this. There is clearly something REALLY wrong with the NHL and how it decides suspensions. None of their last three calls make any sense when compared with eachother, and then when compared with other punishments form the rest of the year make even less sense. If the NHL is actually serious when it comes to doing something about headshots, and wants to get its credability back there needs to be a massive overhaul in how suspensions are handed out.  You can&#8217;t talk tough on headhots and then balk when it comes to a hit like the one Kunitz delivered. I think a shakeup in NHL management is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I guess the individuals that wrote this new set of guidelines must be casual hockey fans, huh?  I thought they were long-time hockey pros that decided it would be best for the future of the game if they eliminated head shots.  Casual hockey fans did not make this new set of rules/interpretation, nor did they make a bunch of rulings that have confused just about everyone. Yeah, thank goodness we don&#039;t have much input from those stupid casual fans...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I guess the individuals that wrote this new set of guidelines must be casual hockey fans, huh?  I thought they were long-time hockey pros that decided it would be best for the future of the game if they eliminated head shots.  Casual hockey fans did not make this new set of rules/interpretation, nor did they make a bunch of rulings that have confused just about everyone. Yeah, thank goodness we don&#8217;t have much input from those stupid casual fans&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stakex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stakex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And thats why casual hockey fans don&#039;t make the rules... thankfully]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thats why casual hockey fans don&#8217;t make the rules&#8230; thankfully</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elvoid</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elvoid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What you need is a casual hockey fan (that would be me) to make this simple.   I don&#039;t care about the details, just the simplicity:

Part A:

1.  If you leave your feet to deliver a hit:  in season, 10 game suspension; in playoffs, suspension for rest of series.

2.  Intentional elbow or shoulder shots to the head:  same punishment.

Part B:

1.  If your hit is responsible for injury to opponent to where opponent misses more games than the above punishment, you are out just as long as they are.  If you end a career, start polishing up your resume for a new line of work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you need is a casual hockey fan (that would be me) to make this simple.   I don&#8217;t care about the details, just the simplicity:</p>
<p>Part A:</p>
<p>1.  If you leave your feet to deliver a hit:  in season, 10 game suspension; in playoffs, suspension for rest of series.</p>
<p>2.  Intentional elbow or shoulder shots to the head:  same punishment.</p>
<p>Part B:</p>
<p>1.  If your hit is responsible for injury to opponent to where opponent misses more games than the above punishment, you are out just as long as they are.  If you end a career, start polishing up your resume for a new line of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is very true that whatever line the NHL is attempting to draw around this topic is written in erasable ink during a hurricane.  They need to have a rule that is enforced consistently so that players will know what is okay and what isn&#039;t.  By the way, same deal with interference and its changing enforcement levels.  Aside from shifting standards, how the heck can the league allege that they are serious about taking these hits out of the game when they give blatant elbows like last nights a one game suspension?  I&#039;ve heard the argument that one game equals a bunch of regular season games, but that is true for the victims, too, isn&#039;t it?  Unless they give series-length suspensions for such blatant head shots they cannot put on their serious face and say how determined they are to remove these incidents from the game.  I&#039;m a Hawks fan and I don&#039;t think the Torres hit was in the &quot;Cooke blatant elbow&quot; category, and I love fighting in the game (I hope to see John Scott beat the crap out of Torres tonight), but these elbows to the head and launches into opponents is over the line....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very true that whatever line the NHL is attempting to draw around this topic is written in erasable ink during a hurricane.  They need to have a rule that is enforced consistently so that players will know what is okay and what isn&#8217;t.  By the way, same deal with interference and its changing enforcement levels.  Aside from shifting standards, how the heck can the league allege that they are serious about taking these hits out of the game when they give blatant elbows like last nights a one game suspension?  I&#8217;ve heard the argument that one game equals a bunch of regular season games, but that is true for the victims, too, isn&#8217;t it?  Unless they give series-length suspensions for such blatant head shots they cannot put on their serious face and say how determined they are to remove these incidents from the game.  I&#8217;m a Hawks fan and I don&#8217;t think the Torres hit was in the &#8220;Cooke blatant elbow&#8221; category, and I love fighting in the game (I hope to see John Scott beat the crap out of Torres tonight), but these elbows to the head and launches into opponents is over the line&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Yerdon</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Yerdon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reminder there hanktheking, I knew we&#039;d forgotten one. It&#039;s been updated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reminder there hanktheking, I knew we&#8217;d forgotten one. It&#8217;s been updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanktheking</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/19/nothing-makes-sense-chris-kunitz-and-steve-downie-each-receive-one-game-suspensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hanktheking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=35152#comment-9899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jarrett Stoll: 1 game for turning Ian Whites brain into mush.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarrett Stoll: 1 game for turning Ian Whites brain into mush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
