<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atlantic Division Watch (February 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/01/atlantic-division-watch-february-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/01/atlantic-division-watch-february-1/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/01/atlantic-division-watch-february-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=26686#comment-8431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, they won it during the 2007-08 season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, they won it during the 2007-08 season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abrienza428</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/01/atlantic-division-watch-february-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[abrienza428]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/?p=26686#comment-8428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know why, but there seems to be a misconception about the Penguins getting to the finals twice while not winning the division.  I&#039;ve read this elsewhere before as well.
The Penguins won the division in the 2007-2008 season and were the #2 seed, then reached the finals.  They were the #4 seed in 2009 and 2010, winning the cup 2009.  No big deal, but it&#039;s strange that I read this from multiple media outlets in the past couple years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why, but there seems to be a misconception about the Penguins getting to the finals twice while not winning the division.  I&#8217;ve read this elsewhere before as well.<br />
The Penguins won the division in the 2007-2008 season and were the #2 seed, then reached the finals.  They were the #4 seed in 2009 and 2010, winning the cup 2009.  No big deal, but it&#8217;s strange that I read this from multiple media outlets in the past couple years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>