<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NHL and NHLPA CBA amendments in the wake of the Kovalchuk signing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/03/nhl-and-nhlpa-cba-amendments-in-the-wake-of-the-kovalchuk-signing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/03/nhl-and-nhlpa-cba-amendments-in-the-wake-of-the-kovalchuk-signing/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should the NHL be upset with the structure of Brad Richards&#8217; new contract? &#124; ProHockeyTalk</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/03/nhl-and-nhlpa-cba-amendments-in-the-wake-of-the-kovalchuk-signing/comment-page-1/#comment-13444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should the NHL be upset with the structure of Brad Richards&#8217; new contract? &#124; ProHockeyTalk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=15173#comment-13444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it looks like the Richards deal will narrowly conform to the CBA amendments that the NHL and NHLPA hashed out after the Kovalchuk situation blew up. Richards deal goes now lower than $1 million, which seems to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it looks like the Richards deal will narrowly conform to the CBA amendments that the NHL and NHLPA hashed out after the Kovalchuk situation blew up. Richards deal goes now lower than $1 million, which seems to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/03/nhl-and-nhlpa-cba-amendments-in-the-wake-of-the-kovalchuk-signing/comment-page-1/#comment-6332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=15173#comment-6332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good :)
Here&#039;s hoping this sets a nice positive tone for things to come....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Here&#8217;s hoping this sets a nice positive tone for things to come&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
