Aug 7, 2010, 2:30 PM EDT
Earlier today, I discussed the fact that the NHL plans on forcing goalies to wear more “form-fitting” pads during the 2010-11 season. The natural reaction is to assume that all goalies would be affected negatively by this change but after picking the brain of The Goalie Guild, it turns out that the changes will be a little bit more complicated than a simple “one size fits all” impact.
Though his percentage was clearly off-the-cuff, it’s interesting that TGG says it’s quite possible that more goalies will benefit from the change if anything else. (Judging by the fact that a huge chunk of NHL goalies are well above six-feet-tall, it makes plenty of sense.)
Yeah. I think I found it was like 70% of goalies are not affected or could potentially wear BIGGER pads … 30% smaller
What the goalie pad measurement tool might look like, via TGG
Justin of TGG explains the rule change in-depth in this post, but I think this quick snippet summarizes the rule change reasonably well. (Note: Kay Whitmore is the man in charge – or at least the figurehead – for the league’s goalie equipment mandates).
In a nutshell, Whitmore’s basis for this new measurement term is to measure the distance between two points, in this case the height from the surface of the ice to the top of the pad, as opposed to measuring the actual leg pad’s height.
Here’s a video from Whitmore explaining some of the changes.
It seems like an unnecessarily complicated way to measure pads (Justin shares the formula in that posted link), one that could benefit goalies with unusually long legs. It’s a strange alteration – one I’ve only sort of wrapped my mind around – but the NHL often makes some very odd decisions when it comes to rules. In that way, they’re as consistent as Martin Brodeur’s brilliant career.
Later today, I’ll discuss a few goalies who likely will suffer some negative consequences from the rule changes. Stay tuned.
* – Exaggeration.
- Ouch: Wild reportedly suspend Harding for ‘non-hockey injury’ 4
- Keeping Kuemper: Wild sign goalie to two-year deal reportedly worth $2.5M 9
- Selanne regrets harsh words toward Boudreau 3
- Flyers’ Timonen admits chances of playing are ‘really slim’ 7
- Desjardins (a.k.a. not Torts) makes good first impression on Canucks 22
- Leafs deny rift between Kessel and coaching staff 20
- Injured Crosby, Malkin will miss start of Pens’ camp 10
- Selanne rips Boudreau in book 18
- Just how damaging are heated negotiations between Jackets, RFA Johansen? 38
- Panthers owners say they’re committed even though team has lost ‘tremendous amounts of money’ 12
- Heeeeeere’s Johnny! Davidson shreds Johansen’s agent for ‘baffling, nonsensical’ contract demands (62)
- Chiarelli: At some point, I’m going to have to trade a defenseman (56)
- Jackets reveal Johansen offers — including an eight year, $46M deal (54)
- Will the NHL publicize divers? (48)
- No icing on the PK? The USHL will see how that looks (43)