<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the Lightning eyeballing Flyers forward Simon Gagne?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/07/15/are-the-lightning-eyeballing-flyers-forward-simon-gagne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/07/15/are-the-lightning-eyeballing-flyers-forward-simon-gagne/</link>
	<description>ProHockeyTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:14:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCHFlyers</title>
		<link>http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/07/15/are-the-lightning-eyeballing-flyers-forward-simon-gagne/comment-page-1/#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JCHFlyers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/3.0/?p=14465#comment-7307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not implausible, but I&#039;m not buying.  While a goaltending prospect sounds nice, I believe the Flyers would need something more proven in return.  Moreover, our recent free agent activity indicates to me that they won&#039;t add yet another defenseman.
Unless there is some more major arrangement in the works...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not implausible, but I&#8217;m not buying.  While a goaltending prospect sounds nice, I believe the Flyers would need something more proven in return.  Moreover, our recent free agent activity indicates to me that they won&#8217;t add yet another defenseman.<br />
Unless there is some more major arrangement in the works&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
