Jun 23, 2010, 11:15 AM EST
In any selection process, there will be parties who are excluded. When it comes to the Hockey Hall of Fame, it might just be a matter of time for some (like, say, Joe Nieuwendyk) while many worry if they’ll never see the day when they are inducted (sadly, that might apply to Pat Burns). While some retired players might be nursing their wounded egos, I couldn’t help but wonder: “Who will make it next year?”
Great hockey history blogger Joe Pelletier posed that question, too, and looked at which players will be eligible for the first time in 2011.
2011 first-time eligible players:
* Ed Belfour
* Trevor Linden
* Glen Wesley
* Derian Hatcher
* Stu Barnes
* Mattias Norstrom
* Dallas Drake
Of that group, only Belfour has a shot. Trevor Linden is my hero, and Derian Hatcher was my favorite villain, but neither are Hall of Fame worthy. Trust me, that hurts to say it, but it’s true.
I cannot help but agree with Pelletier; it’s good news for the 2010 near-misses to see that Belfour is really the only major competitor. Belfour does have some impressive numbers, though, with 484 regular season wins and 88 in the playoffs. His accomplishments also include a Stanley Cup victory, two Vezinas, a Calder trophy, four William Jennings Trophies for the league’s best GAA and five All-Star appearances.
The jilted potential Hall of Famers might have to put a lot of eggs in the 2011 basket, though, because Pelletier points out the stacked 2012 class.
2012 is a much deeper class:
* Jeremy Roenick
* Mats Sundin
* Joe Sakic
* Curtis Joseph
* Brendan Shanahan
* Olaf Kolzig
* Teppo Numminen
* Markus Naslund
* Gary Roberts
* Claude Lemieux
* Bobby Holik
Wow, what a list! You would have to think Sakic and Shanahan are locks. Sundin will make it too, though maybe not in the first year.
While I’d say that Nieuwendyk, Adam Oates, Doug Gilmour and the other players who did well in our poll of hockey bloggers have a good chance in 2011, it’s clear that the committee is pretty hard to figure out. Ultimately, the hope is that the most deserving get elected. Hockey fans can debate if that happen, but really, those discussions are nothing but good for the sport.
That doesn’t change the fact that I’m disappointed Pat Burns was overlooked.
- Video: Pacioretty taken to hospital, reportedly no hearing expected for Stoner after questionable hit 4
- Video: Canadiens honor long-time captain Saku Koivu 2
- Crosby back for Pens after missing three games with the mumps 1
- Comparing the shot differentials of all 30 teams 9
- PHT interviews Jim Nill, who’s ‘not surprised’ by Stars’ early-season struggles 2
- Mark Howe on his father’s health: ‘He’s back in the ballgame’ 3
- Holland: ‘I’m not against fighting’ 8
- Preds’ Neal fined for diving 24
- After surprising start, Flames sign Hartley to multi-year contract extension 5
- Update your wallcharts: Rangers confirm Brassard has mumps 11