May 19, 2010, 4:00 PM EDT
If there’s one thing we can count on every postseason, it’s the
endless supply of articles that rip the San Jose Sharks to shreds for
yet another playoffs disappointment. This year, I had hopes that perhaps
we could avoid all that — as fun as it may be — and even if the
Chicago Blackhawks won the Conference finals we could sit back and say
“well, at least they gave it their best shot.”
After two games, it
appears that won’t be the case.
In Game 1, you could say that the
Sharks were just unlucky as they hit an Antti Niemi that was suddenly
on fire. They outplayed the Hawks for much of Game 1, and for at least
the first part of Game 2. While plenty of inked will be spilled writing
about yet another Joe Thornton collapse, much of the attention should be
on the play of Evgeni Nabokov; specifically, how the soft goals he
allows suck every ounce of life out of the team in front of him.
could say that Game 1 was an anomaly; a hard fought, close game in
which the Sharks just couldn’t score on Niemi. Yet in Game 2, the team
was grossly outplayed for much of the contest and it all started with a
deflating first goal. Coach
Todd McLellan and Joe Pavelski agree:
“(That) goal took a lot out of us for some reason,” coach Todd
McClellan admitted. “You could feel it on the bench. It took us a while
to climb back and get the energy level back up where it needed to be.”
“Didn’t have nearly enough guys out there,” revealed Joe
Pavelski said after Chicago thumped San Jose 4-2 to take the
proverbial commanding 2-0 series lead. “When we have won so far this
season, it’s been a commitment by everybody. Everybody’s showed up, and
that’s what we need.”
There’s some detailed insight for ya.
After two games, this is not a case of Niemi stealing wins, as I’ve
seen Sharks fans boast on Twitter. Instead, this is yet another instance
of a team not being able to step up and hit that extra gear with the
opposing teams take the game to another level.
This isn’t an issue with talent, this has to do with heart. For
whatever reason, this Sharks team — like others before — is incapable
of rising to the challenge with the stakes are at their highest.
You see it nearly every season and it’s painful to watch; a team with all the talent in the world falls by the wayside as a stronger and mentally tough team takes them out. It’s not about matchups and overall talent, it’s about just how much each team wants this win. Sometimes wanting it isn’t enough, sometimes the pressure is just too much.
Sometimes, the core of your team is missing something vital for playoff success.
- It’s Detroit Red Wings Day at PHT 8
- What does Jack Eichel mean to the Buffalo Sabres? 27
- It’s Buffalo Sabres Day at PHT 33
- Bernier, Leafs agree on two-year, $8.3 million deal 28
- How do Voracek, Giroux compare to the most expensive duos? 62
- Voracek turns monster season into massive eight-year deal 71
- Report: Canucks, Sutter closing in on five-year deal, north of $20M 28
- Voynov serving sentence at jail that once advertised it had flat screen TVs 45
- Report: Bernier and Leafs more than $2 million apart ahead of Friday’s arbitration hearing 12
- Flyers re-sign Couturier: six years, $26 million 41
- Voracek turns monster season into massive eight-year deal (71)
- How do Voracek, Giroux compare to the most expensive duos? (62)
- Trade: Penguins send Sutter to Canucks for Bonino, Clendening (54)
- Voynov serving sentence at jail that once advertised it had flat screen TVs (45)
- Here’s a chart that shows which teams have been good/bad at drafting (44)