Skip to content

Examining PHT Staff second round predictions

May 15, 2010, 8:30 PM EDT

Comments Off

We don’t take ourselves too seriously here at Pro Hockey Talk. Ultimately, we want to bing you a nice mixture of puck-based news and entertainment. One of the more torturous practices involves making fearful predictions for a sport that is about as predictable as a David Lynch film. To the chagrin of us three, we must now assess the wreckage of our predictions. (Want to read them and chuckle derisively at our now-foolish notions? Click here for the West and here for the East.)

To do so, I looked at our results on two levels: the standard series predictions and also a “plus/minus” system. The plus/minus system is pretty simple: I took our series scores and deducted a point for every missed win. So, for instance, I predicted the San Jose Sharks to sweep the Colorado Avalanche. This means that I’m “equal” for the Sharks and -2 for the Avs. (Naturally, there’s no way to get any pluses but plus/minus seems like the simplest title.)

The wild and woolly second round really wounded our records. It’s like a crime scene, really. I almost don’t want to share the results, but maybe you’ll at least get a chuckle at our collective sadness.

Joe Yerdon

Round 1 series score: 6-2
Round 2 series score: 0-4
Overall: 6-6

Round 1 “plus/minus”: -15
Round 2 “plus/minus”: -14
Overall: -29

James O’Brien

Round 1 series score: 5-3
Round 2 series score: 1-3
Overall: 6-6

Round 1 “plus/minus”: -16
Round 2 “plus/minus”: -10
Overall: -26

Brandon Worley

Round 1 series score: 2-6
Round 2 series score: 0-4
Overall: 2-10

Round 1 “plus/minus”: -19
Round 2 “plus/minus”: -14
Overall: -33

Featured video

Flyers have many concerns

Sign up for Fantasy hockey

Top 10 NHL Player Searches
  1. P. Datsyuk (3428)
  2. J. Spezza (3016)
  3. J. Drouin (2961)
  4. E. Kane (2886)
  5. S. Varlamov (2878)
  1. M. Gaborik (2744)
  2. E. Staal (2640)
  3. V. Hedman (2267)
  4. P. Dupuis (2259)
  5. P. Stastny (2214)