May 13, 2010, 3:30 PM EDT
It’s been a couple years since someone brought up the idea of the Penguins trading Evgeni Malkin. On some level, it’s kind of refreshing. Like hearing an old friend make the same terrible joke he used to make when you were still in high school.
This time, John Grigg of The Hockey News brings the concept to the forefront.
Trading Malkin would do a number of things for the Pens. First, it would net Pittsburgh a winger to play with Crosby; God only knows what type of numbers he could put up with something more than an average player to pass the puck to.
Second, it would open up more ice time for Staal; who, although he didn’t put up great numbers, was a beast in the playoffs and looks to be on the verge of becoming a player more akin to older brother Eric than the third line checker he’s been pigeon-holed as.
Also, a Malkin trade frees up cap space; $8.7 million to be exact. That’s a lot of cake. And having Staal’s $4 million as No. 2 center money makes a lot more sense these days. The $8.7-million difference could be spent shoring up a blueline that has just three players signed to it next season.
It’s amazing how much of a difference winning (or losing) can make. Isn’t this a team that made two trips to the Stanley Cup Finals and won one of them? Grigg’s overarching idea that the Penguins would be better off with a scoring winger instead of Malkin doesn’t hold much water when you consider the fact that the Montreal Canadiens shut down a wing-centric offense in the Washington Capitals. Should the Caps and Pens just trade “problems”?
Let me make this plainly clear. The Penguins would be (unpublishable adjective) crazy to trade Malkin. Teams don’t get better when they move star players. Take a look at Grigg’s idea.
Here’s an idea a couple of us came up with. I repeat, an idea we came up with. Not a rumor. Malkin and a fifth round pick to Edmonton for the first overall selection, Magnus Paajarvi-Svensson and Sheldon Souray.
Yuck. While Taylor Hall and another prospect sound appealing, why would Pittsburgh want to waste cap space on an oft-injured, aging and inferior-to-Gonchar type player such as Souray? And keep in mind, this is a relatively rich package in the world of fantasy trades.
Nope, the best idea is to keep your stars and hope that you can make the occasional lucky, cheap free agent moves. Maybe it’s not the perfect way to build a team, but my guess is that all but a handful of NHL teams would trade places with Pittsburgh in a heartbeat.
- Playoff watch — what the bubble teams need to do 0
- Bruins can’t hold Ducks off, suffer sixth loss in a row 22
- Ticket punched: Rangers become first team to clinch 2015 playoff berth 12
- Coyotes ‘win’ against Sabres in OT 41
- Marchand: If Bruins miss playoffs, ‘this is going to be a much different group next year’ 20
- Is Lecavalier offering to retire early to facilitate trade out of Philly? 28
- Hextall insists he’s ‘on the same page’ with Snider 15
- Krejci ‘probable’ to return versus Ducks 11
- Flyers announce Simmonds, MacDonald done for the season with injuries 18
- Video: Flyers crush Blackhawks, Voracek joins league lead in points 11
- Dreger: ‘In Kessel’s case, I firmly believe he’s going to be traded’ (73)
- Red Wings beat Blues in OT, but should winning goal count? (56)
- Tank-worthy? Connor McDavid finishes OHL season with 120 points in 47 games (56)
- Report: No fine or suspension for Tyler Toffoli’s hit on Alex Burrows (51)
- Dubnyk leads Wild past Isles in SO, earns 10th straight road win (44)