Skip to content

Varlamov to start for Capitals in game 3

Apr 19, 2010, 11:29 AM EDT

TheodoreVarly.jpgJose Theodore received a quick yank against the Canadiens on Saturday
night, after allowing two goals on two shots. The Habs would score three
more on his replacement Semyon Varlamov and with the series headed back
to Montreal tonight, I was thinking that perhaps the Capitals might
want veteran Theodore back in net for an incredibly important game 3.

Damien Cox is reporting that
the Capitals will, in fact, go with Varlamov in net.

As Japers’ Rink covers here, Varlamov has had much more success historically against the Habs in Montreal, and has actually won two playoff series for the Capitals. Theodore has three losses in three starts for the Capitals the past two season in playoffs.

You have to feel for Theodore, however, who was so focused on not repeating last
season’s disappointing playoff performance and was coming off a great
regular season. Now he’s been passed up, yet again for Varlamov; you can be certain that Boudreau will not hesitate to turn back to
Theodore if Varlamov struggles.

With the Capitals, they will do what’s necessary to ensure they have the
best players on the ice as they strive for a Stanley Cup. If that means
a goaltender rotation, then so be it.

  1. hockymn22 - Apr 19, 2010 at 11:56 AM

    There is no proof that Varly is starting yet. They haven’t finished the morning skate, which usually determines. I wouldn’t be surprised if we didn’t know who started til the game tonight.

  2. Brandon Worley - Apr 19, 2010 at 12:27 PM

    Several sources reported that Varlamov is starting, and he was the first off the ice today at practice. Seems near certain to me.

  3. nubs - Apr 19, 2010 at 12:44 PM

    2 goals on 2 shots not proof enough?

  4. Matt - Apr 19, 2010 at 1:28 PM

    Not to mention to me, it’s common sense. And it has nothing to do with how well (or not well) either goalie has played.
    I would not start Theodore in Montreal with his history there. Period.

  5. BigPaul - Apr 19, 2010 at 2:03 PM

    Yes. Agree. The first shot should have easily been blocked; maybe not so much for the second one. But 2 for 2 was really bad.

Top 10 NHL Player Searches